We know you did it, you know you did it, you know we know you did it…nuff said.
Besides the results are plain to see, it worked a treat:
The police also revealed that there had been a few cases of attacks on British Muslims in the wake of the bombings - including one in which an individual was “seriously injured.”
A petrol bomb attack on a couple of Mosques too etc etc .
So you others to wait for the evidence before blaming Jihadist’s but it’s okay to blame the Gov. for the bombings without knowing any of the facts. Hypercrite.
An impartial body outside of the investigation would bring with it an open mind on the direction of the investigation. It would not only make clarity of the already (purposefully) obscure information on the initial threat and consequent actions, but would add a degree of transparency to the proceedings, which in a democratic free nation is little to ask.
While the prime minister and ex-met office police chief shout ‘Muslims dun it’ a probe would look into all possible connections and machinations:
Now tell me, why do you think a probe into the attacks is unnecessary, apart from the obvious cover-up?
You can never have enough bodies looking into an incident such as this so soon after the crime. To suggest otherwise smells of US police statism at worst and bad investigative procedure at best.
There are multiple security apparatuses investigating the bombing, you want an “impartial” body to watch (interfere/slowdown) the investigation? We'll how about a probe of that impartial body and how about a probe of that probe?
You have organizations trained to investigate these acts and I don’t see how adding another layer helps. After the investigation depending on what it finds an independent investigation on why intelligence failed to prevent the bombing may be needed.
No UTD there is enough uncertainty in the reporting of basic facts as it is, why do you think the oppostion party called for the investigation 'to slow things down' or to do it's job and check unilateral descison making when the well-being of the populace is at stake.
If there is so much uncertainty then the whole system should be scrapped. Of course there will always be people calling for that if they don't like the results of what they come up with.
Let's at least have an enquiry which can be built upon as the investigation proceeds, it's pretty normal procedure when money is involved, this is much more important.
If Israel and America are going to have a say in investigating these bombings, then I think Iran and Pakistan should be invited to have an equal role as well. That will make it a balanced investigation.
I'd agree that some type of member rotating division that overviews such investigations without interference (meaning no public comment until to the investigation(s) are complete) should be a standard thing.
It would be a complicated and could impede investigations though, some type of immunity towards the investigators might be needed, not to protect them against cover-ups but from irregular procedures that may occur during the investigation.
Well whichever you dress her, the speculation on Israel's involvment and the strength of the 'nothing to gain for Muslims' arguement warrants an enquiry.
Something smells rotten in Denmark no matter how much perfume you slap on.
You can't lose anything by having one apart from a cover up, simple as that.
So you agree that there should be a joint Anglo-American-Iranian-Israeli-Pakistani investigation into these bombings? I am being serious as well. It will go quite a bit of way to establish the full and true facts from a balanced team of investiagtors.
Enquiry ?? what for ..
who needs evidence to attack us Muslims now ? WMD ? taht was a nice one . After hundreds of investigations by the UN and hundreds of factoires and houses and "chemical agents " manufacturing plants destroyed , we come to know there is no WMD. Iraq, or lets say Saddam gave full access to Un observers to look where ever they want for WMD or chemical weapons. they did not find it. Yet the Americans attacked a muslim nation and we supported it . The F$#K any enquiries would deny muslim hand in the bombing . The enquire into 9/11 started after they had bombed of afghanistan and were into Iraq.
what inquiries are you guys talking about. Whats the purpose of an enquiry. To find the truth ? The truth was / is that there are/were no WMD in iraq , "so what , Mr enquirer, we would bomb afghanistan and Iraq cause we think OSB did it and he's a muslim , so tough luck muslims and mr enquirer , cause we don't give a shti about would your investigations reveal "
Let the Americans find the truth like they did with WTC, WMDs and Iraq...Lies, lies and damned lies again it'll be...And a few more millions will die...
That's actually so funny you can make a joke out of it...