Shouldn't always trust wikipedia, blessed, especially when there aren't any references provided. One of my lecturers used to take marks off us if we used wikipedia as a reference because the information available there can be manipulated and isn't always authentic.
Anyway, in this case, it is true that black rose doesn't exist in nature.
Shouldn't always trust wikipedia, blessed, especially when there aren't any references provided. One of my lecturers used to take marks off us if we used wikipedia as a reference because the information available there can be manipulated and isn't always authentic.
Anyway, in this case, it is true that black rose doesn't exist in nature.
thats true but i have always noted whatever i find on wikipedia it turns out to be true (when i see it on some other source and compare it to wikipedia info)
Shouldn't always trust wikipedia, blessed, especially when there aren't any references provided. One of my lecturers used to take marks off us if we used wikipedia as a reference because the information available there can be manipulated and isn't always authentic.
Anyway, in this case, it is true that black rose doesn't exist in nature.
Exactly, our lecturer told us the same. You shouldn't use wiki cz anybody can change the given information.
Shouldn't always trust wikipedia, blessed, especially when there aren't any references provided. One of my lecturers used to take marks off us if we used wikipedia as a reference because the information available there can be manipulated and isn't always authentic.
Anyway, in this case, it is true that black rose doesn't exist in nature.
Yeah even i can change the information from Wiki lol
mujhe pata hai ke asal main black rose exist karta hai. but sirf yeh maloon karna tha ke kaala rang qudrati hota hai ya nahi. and after some research i found out that by nature there is no black rose...scientists used other roses-got their genes etc to create the colour black for the black rose.