Interesting article floating over the net, and sent by emails, informative to read, spotting down some essential and unrecognized points.
The Author said:
OSAMA BIN LADEN:
Muqtedar Khan
Do no mischief on Earth Quran 7:56, 7:74)
Those with good sense must prohibit mischief on earth (Quran 11:116)
Bin Laden has become a significant moral challenge to Muslims. His
alleged association with the perpetrators of 9/11 attacks raises a major
question about the relationship between Islam and terrorism. If he is
guilty then he incriminates the faith of Islam by using it as a
motivation and justification for his actions. If he is innocent, then
why is he such a big hero?
If Bin Laden is not guilty of the embassy bombings, of the attack on
USS Cole and the attack on America then why do some Muslims admire him?
Bin Laden has become a symbol of resistance and empowerment to a
community deprived of freedom and opportunities for self-determination.
He is a hero to a community that has long got used to living with an
overwhelming sense of helplessness. He is a promise that even the weak
and the hopeless can strike back.
If my understanding of why Bin Laden is a hero is correct then it means
that his charisma is dependent on Muslim acceptance that he is indeed
responsible for the various attacks against the US, regardless of the
availability of evidence. He is a hero because some Muslims believe that
he indeed pulled of all those spectacular attacks against the world’s
sole superpower. His heroism and his popularity in the Muslim world is
an indictment of him as a terrorist and his supporters as supporters of
terrorism.
But Muslims, without any reservations, have condemned the attacks of
Sept. 11th as morally reprehensible and unjustifiable. Prominent member
of the Ulema have also established the unIslamic character of the 9/11
attacks. All Muslims agree that terrorism is unIslamic and deplorable
and the perpetrators must be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
Bin Laden has denied any connections to the attacks and many Muslims
believe that he is really innocent and are critical of the American
establishment for not providing conclusive evidence against Bin Laden
before launching a war against Afghanistan.
How are non-Muslims, unsympathetic to the "conditions that engender
violence" supposed to interpret Muslim condemnation of the attacks and
Muslim hero worship of Binladen? How can Muslims condemn terrorism
without also condemning terrorists?
How US media and authorities resolve this dilemma of, Muslim
condemnation of the attacks and simultaneous support for Bin Laden, will
determine the future relations not only between the US and Muslim
nations, but also between mainstream America and American Muslims.
As long as Muslims hesitate to condemn Bin Laden they will be seen as
supporters of terrorism. This issue has also become a test of Muslim
loyalties to America. When and if the FBI and company do produce
conclusive evidence against Bin Laden, Muslim condemnation of the man
will be meaningless. As of now many Muslims, including some leaders who
have no conclusive evidence of Bin Laden’s innocence have chosen to err
on the side of Bin Laden and not America. This may make them popular in
some pockets of the Muslim community, but it also makes them suspect in
American mainstream.
It baffles the mind to watch American Muslim leaders waffle over
condemning Bin Laden as a terrorist who is misappropriating Islamic
ideals and incriminating Islam in his campaign of terror. This man has
undermined decades of hard work by these very same leaders to make Islam
more acceptable in America. The shadow of Bin Laden now looms large on
the decades of efforts by these same leaders at building bridges with
other faith-based communities. The issue of condemnation stands clearly
between American Muslims and the American government. Rather than
perceiving American Muslims as a national asset and source for
diplomatic expertise that can be deployed in defence of American
interests, the establishment sees American Muslims as potential
suspects, because they are not confident about where Muslim sympathies
lie.
The only reason why there is no explicit condemnation of Bin Laden by
major Muslim organizations, who have recently condemned American bombing
of Afghanistan, is perhaps their fear of losing support with the
constituency that they seek to serve. They fear that if they condemn
him, even as a matter of self/public interest (maslaha in Islamic law)
they will be perceived as taking sides with America in this war between
America and Islam.
We Muslims have to realize two important things; Bin Laden and his
tactics, no matter how just his causes, are detrimental to Muslims as
well as to the image of Islam. The present suffering of the Afghan
people is a direct consequence of their association and support for Bin
Laden. Secondly, we cannot hide behind the issue of evidence and hedge
about condemning those who murder innocent people, in direct violation
of Islamic teachings.
When we say that there is no evidence against Bin Laden, what we really
mean is that there isn’t enough to meet the legal standards of American
and western jurisprudence. Since when have Bin Laden and Taliban become
subscribers of the Bill of rights and amendment 14 (due process) of the
US constitution? Just take a look at the way in which Taliban’s courts
have meted out justice in the last five years. The video tapes in which
Bin Laden says that he supports those who attack the US, the fatwa’s
declaring war on the US, his promise of more such attacks, alone should
be sufficient to hang him according to the legal practices of the
Taliban, and for that matter other Middle Eastern regimes which are
notorious for their kangaroo courts.
Why does Bin Laden and not ordinary citizens of Afghanistan deserve the
full protection of civil liberties guaranteed by the US constitution?
Bin Laden supports the Taliban and he deserves only what they can offer.
Hang him to the soccer goal post, where the Taliban have hanged many in
the recent past using their medieval techniques of law enforcement.
Let’s assume for the sake of argument that Bin Laden has nothing to do
with 9/11. This man is still guilty of the following acts: He has
blasphemed Islam (by following Wahabism and the Ikhwan (Islamic
brotherhood)). He has used its sacred principles to incite murder and
mayhem. He has declared war on the US and called on all Muslims to
murder Americans making Muslims targets for retaliatory attacks. He has
exposed millions of Afghans to war, starvation and misery to save his
own skin. If he were a hero, he would have surrendered. Not because he
was guilty, but to save poor innocent Muslims from the ravages of war.
He has attacked the moral fabric of Muslim life by glorifying terrorism.
He is trying to embroil the Muslim Ummah in a global war of death and
destruction by calling the American war on Bin Laden as a war on Islam.
His use of Islamic values have made Muslims look like terrorists and in
most parts of the world people are associating Islam with violence and
Muslims with terror. This man does not have the interest of Islam or
Muslims at heart. He is an enemy of Islam and Muslims and should be
treated as such.
It is time Muslim scholars and leaders fulfilled their Islamic duty
(Quran 11:116) and condemned Bin Laden for what he is, and rescued not
only Islam but also our misguided youth from the clutches of this
mischief monger.
Exposing the Enemy With in!
MAY ALLAH GUIDE US ALL TO THE TRUE FORM OF ISLAM OF PROPHET MOHAMMAD SALLALAHU ALAYHI WA SALLAM AND ALL THE PREVIOUS PROPHETS AND RID US FROM THE DEVIATION OF THESE DEVIATE GROUPS AND EVIL SCHOLARS.