Bhutto's death anniversary

[Anwer_Pasha]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@Gujranwalay

seems the number of attendees keeps going lower and lower…each time.
oh well, u can only gather so many for plates of chicken biryanis

No it was unfortunately hottest day ever and it was a whole day program so thousands were stranded for some shelter like under the trees .

[Sachaydino]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@Moonstar201

^ Theory of relativity applies for almost all situations.

Bhutto a great leader for many but a villain for many in PK as well.

Similarly

Zia is hero for many but villain for many also…

History is telling now that if bhutto was alive , PK wud have been much different and may have not shaped up the way we are now.

ZAB was a great leader for majority of the population then. Only minority comprising of terrorists JI were staunch opponent of him. khuda waste in haamyon ko ZAB se ber tha ab un ki na jaaiz aulad bhi wohi rag alap rahi hay. I have been very close observer of his ruling the country. ab jo leader hain woh us ke saamne bhanghi se bhi bad tar hain. hukumat to kujha woh saalay jawab bhi parh kar dete hain. un ko sirf yeh aata hay ke dharti maan ka zana kaisay kya jata hay aor us ko bhej kar bahir ke benkon main paisa kaasay bhara jata. hara zaday.

[mahool]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@Sachaydino

ZAB was a great leader for majority of the population then. Only minority comprising of terrorists JI were staunch opponent of him. khuda waste in haamyon ko ZAB se ber tha ab un ki na jaaiz aulad bhi wohi rag alap rahi hay. I have been very close observer of his ruling the country. ab jo leader hain woh us ke saamne bhanghi se bhi bad tar hain. hukumat to kujha woh saalay jawab bhi parh kar dete hain. un ko sirf yeh aata hay ke dharti maan ka zana kaisay kya jata hay aor us ko bhej kar bahir ke benkon main paisa kaasay bhara jata. hara zaday.

kujha nahi kuja… you are so right.

[Sachaydino]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@mahool

It is unjust post. Aijaz has said nothing… he posted an article… If you want to say.. then condemn the author… To my knowledge… article put all facts together… what is the part in article irritate you?

**Why do you think it is unjust? AP has used very moderate words for JI terrorists. The article was written by some hara zada kathiawarhi mentally unbalanced terrorist of JI. Whole article is a sh!t of lies and some one who has bloody animosity with ZAB has written this article in a sh!t hole. Have you read the bottom of this article quoted by ajazali you are advocating here? Any one who agrees with this JI mentally unbalanced terrorist writer should visit a mental doctor.

**

@ajazali

Engineer, former visiting lecturer at NED Engineering College, industrialist, associated with petroleum/chemical industries for many years. Loves writing, and** (in the opinion of most of those who know him), mentally unbalanced. He tweets @shakirlakhani (twitter.com/shakirlakhani)**

[Sachaydino]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@mahool

kujha nahi kuja… you are so right.

Thanks for correction. These JI ***** always supported the most corrupt rapist drunkard dictators. They apparently claim they are honest and follow Islam of Hazrat Umar Bin Khitab, actually they are followers and progeny of Iblis and super hypocrite Abdullah Bin Ubai who was vehemently condemned in Holy Qura’n.

[muqawwee123]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@mahool

It is unjust post. Aijaz has said nothing… he posted an article… If you want to say.. then condemn the author… To my knowledge… article put all facts together… what is the part in article irritate you?

The article is too simplistic and written with dishonest approach to blame atrocities of whole system on one person. It is easy to make a person scapegoat and absolve whole strong groups like army, dictators, religious organisation and their armed wings (who also used rape as an arm to suprress a movement). Was Bhutto that powerful in 1970-71 that no one could stopf him from seperating East Pakistan. When did Mujeeb first present his six points agenda? Was Bhutto in position to sabotag those points? Can a soverign state accept all 6 points for differnet parts of a country? If we think over answers of these questions, we can save our time to follow retarded propaganda spread by any tom, dick and harry.

As far as nationalisation is concerned, whole world was experimenting with such ideas. Didn’t India follow nationalization under Indira Gandhi? Experiments may or may not be successful. You can question Bhutto’s strategy and find faults the way it was implemented, but did he gain any personal benefits from nationalization? Thinks over and search such instances, before blaimng him. Some people and their business did affected due to nationalisation and these people and their children (like Lakhanis. I don’t know background of writer, but he might have some links with business community who got affected with nationalisation) will not forget the personal pain and loss of ownership over properties.

BTW, did Lakhai forgive his forefathers who kept silence when west Pakistan was enjoying east Pakistan capital?

[Hakuna_Matata_1]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@muqawwee123

The article is too simplistic and written with dishonest approach to blame atrocities of whole system on one person. It is easy to make a person scapegoat and absolve whole strong groups like army, dictators, religious organisation and their armed wings (who also used rape as an arm to suprress a movement). Was Bhutto that powerful in 1970-71 that no one could stopf him from seperating East Pakistan. When did Mujeeb first present his six points agenda? Was Bhutto in position to sabotag those points? Can a soverign state accept all 6 points for differnet parts of a country? If we think over answers of these questions, we can save our time to follow retarded propaganda spread by any tom, dick and harry.

As far as nationalisation is concerned, whole world was experimenting with such ideas. Didn’t India follow nationalization under Indira Gandhi? Experiments may or may not be successful. You can question Bhutto’s strategy and find faults the way it was implemented, but did he gain any personal benefits from nationalization? Thinks over and search such instances, before blaimng him. Some people and their business did affected due to nationalisation and these people and their children (like Lakhanis. I don’t know background of writer, but he might have some links with business community who got affected with nationalisation) will not forget the personal pain and loss of ownership over properties.

BHAI ko chai pilaun me ??

[muqawwee123]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@Hakuna_Matata

BHAI ko chai pilaun me ??

wadda aaya chai wala

[SID_NY]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

I think Bhutto’s execution is the saddest chapter in Pakistani history after Quaid’s death and Pakistan split. It was such a weak case that he could be tried and prosecuted, and Zia was scared of Bhutto so he made sure that the execution is done. And even after death his dead body was insulted by taking his naked pictures just to make sure he was a muslim. Nothing could be more shameful than that.

All in the name of Islam..

[Hakuna_Matata_1]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@muqawwee123

wadda aaya chai wala

kese hain aap ??

Kabhi hamari gali bhi ao na

[ajazali]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@muqawwee123

The article is too simplistic and written with dishonest approach to blame atrocities of whole system on one person. It is easy to make a person scapegoat and absolve whole strong groups like army, dictators, religious organisation and their armed wings (who also used rape as an arm to suprress a movement). Was Bhutto that powerful in 1970-71 that no one could stopf him from seperating East Pakistan. When did Mujeeb first present his six points agenda? Was Bhutto in position to sabotag those points? Can a soverign state accept all 6 points for differnet parts of a country? If we think over answers of these questions, we can save our time to follow retarded propaganda spread by any tom, dick and harry.

As far as nationalisation is concerned, whole world was experimenting with such ideas. Didn’t India follow nationalization under Indira Gandhi? Experiments may or may not be successful. You can question Bhutto’s strategy and find faults the way it was implemented, but did he gain any personal benefits from nationalization? Thinks over and search such instances, before blaimng him. Some people and their business did affected due to nationalisation and these people and their children (like Lakhanis. I don’t know background of writer, but he might have some links with business community who got affected with nationalisation) will not forget the personal pain and loss of ownership over properties.

BTW, did Lakhai forgive his forefathers who kept silence when west Pakistan was enjoying east Pakistan capital?

So it was an atrocity of system that made bhuto support ayuob and become cabinet member?
It was not his selfishness but system which froced him to not to accept mandate of east pakistan?
The article doesnt cover the whole episode but it does mention bhutto evil part. Its you trying to cover bhutto.
I know you have nothing to say except about JI.

[Anwer_Pasha]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@ajazali

So it was an atrocity of system that made bhuto support ayuob and become cabinet member?
It was not his selfishness but system which froced him to not to accept mandate of east pakistan?
The article doesnt cover the whole episode but it does mention bhutto evil part. Its you trying to cover bhutto.
I know you have nothing to say except about JI.

Bhutto didn’t support Ayoub to come into power , Even he was not in Pakistan at the time of that coup , He was working as delegate in UN and remember , it was first martial law for Pakistan , Bhutto was a young man at that time , Bhutto’s part in 1970 was limited , power was in hand of military , They did the aa .and Terrorist JI always supported dictators and destroying the Pakistan .

[ajazali]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@Anwer_Pasha

Bhutto didn’t support Ayoub to come into power , Even he was not in Pakistan at the time of that coup , He was working as delegate in UN and remember , it was first martial law for Pakistan , Bhutto was a young man at that time , Bhutto’s part in 1970 was limited , power was in hand of military , They did the aa .and Terrorist JI always supported dictators and destroying the Pakistan .

Cabinet minster of ayoub was founder of haramkhor party still you blaming others for supporting dictators.

[Anwer_Pasha]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@ajazali

Cabinet minster of ayoub was founder of haramkhor party still you blaming others for supporting dictators.

He resigned from government , made his new party and did best for democracy , same time terrorist JI was working as puppet of establishment and killing Pakistanis in EP

[ajazali]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

There is no harm in supporting a dictator as long as he promoting you to power. If dictator differs with politician then dictatorship is haram hand democracy is the true path.

[muqawwee123]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@ajazali

So it was an atrocity of system that made bhuto support ayuob and become cabinet member?
It was not his selfishness but system which froced him to not to accept mandate of east pakistan?
The article doesnt cover the whole episode but it does mention bhutto evil part. Its you trying to cover bhutto.
I know you have nothing to say except about JI.

Chor ki daRhi main tinka.

Why should not we see things in large perspectiev, just because uss main kuch parda nasheenon ke naam bhi aate hain?

What is the fuss about being part of Ayub’s cabinet. If this was Bhutto’s major drawback in your view, then why are you stuck up with JI. A party who always supported dictators, remained part of Zia and Mushy’s cabinet.

Who stopped that bloody Yahya to hang, if Bhutto was seperating the country? Did Bhutto ask for conducting operation Searchlight? Did Bhutto ask Pakistan government not to help people of East Pakistan during 1969 cyclone / Tornado? Was Bhutto the first who called leaders of Muslim League East Pakistan traitors? Bhutto was obviously not the head of Alshams and Albadr.

[ajazali]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@muqawwee123

Chor ki daRhi main tinka.

Why should not we see things in large perspectiev, just because uss main kuch parda nasheenon ke naam bhi aate hain?

What is the fuss about being part of Ayub’s cabinet. If this was Bhutto’s major drawback in your view, then why are you stuck up with JI. A party who always supported dictators, remained part of Zia and Mushy’s cabinet.

Who stopped that bloody Yahya to hang, if Bhutto was seperating the country? Did Bhutto ask for conducting operation Searchlight? Did Bhutto ask Pakistan government not to help people of East Pakistan during 1969 cyclone / Tornado? Was Bhutto the first who called leaders of Muslim League East Pakistan traitors? Bhutto was obviously not the head of Alshams and Albadr.

Please continue seeing thing in “large perspective”(hypocrisy and whataboutism) keep blaming JI and worshiping your bhutto.

[muqawwee123]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@ajazali

Please continue seeing thing in “large perspective”(hypocrisy and whataboutism) keep blaming JI and worshiping your bhutto.

Okay.

Keep living in your myopic bubble chanting slogan ‘meetha meetha hup hup, kaRwa kaRwa thoo thoo’.

[Mostar95]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

On a 12th Rabi ul awwal of 1980 or 81 JI was on roads to welcome the so called Islami Nizam implementation order by Mardood Zia. Jamat was also the main supporter of nizam e salat by him as well. They were in his cabinet of non elected ministers as well.

They ran the false movement of March-May 1977 in the name of Islam which was only limited to the major cities. In that movement Bhutto was portrayed as almost as a kafir by the mullahs of all the sects and JI.

[ajazali]

Re: Bhutto’s death anniversary

@Mostar95

On a 12th Rabi ul awwal of 1980 or 81 JI was on roads to welcome the so called Islami Nizam implementation order by Mardood Zia. Jamat was also the main supporter of nizam e salat by him as well. They were in his cabinet of non elected ministers as well.

They ran the false movement of March-May 1977 in the name of Islam which was only limited to the major cities. In that movement Bhutto was portrayed as almost as a kafir by the mullahs of all the sects and JI.

oh hypocrite, say something about Bhutto as this thread is about bhutto you worship.