people strive for and loudly claim that specificity in their lives is essential.
they want to be absolutely sure that whatever is infront of them has a set pattern to their expectations.
some people would want specificity to this level: even if they change their own ways (unpredictable to others), others will change accordingly, simply because former change.
most people would like to see a stable and predictable life, even when they plan for one, things may go infact absolutely wrong and opposite the effect they thought they were shaping while selfishly over-confirming everything.
risks, on the other hand, no one likes to take or has double standards in building interpersonal relations, that too with a selfish motive at times.
in either mode, what works: risks that can and will benfit, only when confidently allowed, or sheer predictive specificity which may run the risk of irony?
share your thought, if you like.
Dushwari