discuss.
Re: Being dumb, biproduct of having no faith?
How do you define dumb? Someone who is not intelligent as in booksmart or worldly, someone who lacks savvy, someone who is socially inept?
Once you define "dumb" - we can carry on with a discussion.
Re: Being dumb, biproduct of having no faith?
with regards to religious matters - yes
zero imaan will always lead to trying to rationalise things with what only the eyes see, not of what you know but merely what you see.
zero imaan will always lead to trying to rationalise things with what only the eyes see, not of what you know but merely what you see.
I am so glad you said that.
Now how big are the things which we cant see?? (not talking about God and angels.)
How important is not limiting our self to other ppl's brains?
How important is it, to not let ppl shape our imagination?
How do you define dumb? Someone who is not intelligent as in booksmart or worldly, someone who lacks savvy, someone who is socially inept?
Once you define "dumb" - we can carry on with a discussion.
++!
Please explain "dumb."
My generic reply is, it has nothing to do with faith. Both those on the extreme end of the faith and those with no faith can be extremely stupid. No debate there.
Dumbness and faith do not have a causal relationship (regardless of how you define dumbness), neither can one predict the other 100% of the time. However, the question can come down to how most people who have a faith act and how those who don't have any faith act. But what most people would do does not determine what everyone would and does do.
Re: Being dumb, biproduct of having no faith?
^ Exactly...