Be fair to Tendulkar.

I think the media, the public, ex-cricketers, commentators all have been unfair to Sachin Tendulkar. Whenever he performs well he is living up to the expectations, when he fails he is just not so good agaisnt quality oppositions. Then everyone talks about Dravid being India’s best batsman. No doubt Dravid is a class act, and his batting in the first test proved that, but I think its just unfair to say he is India’s best batsman. Tendulkar is & have been by far India’s best batsman. Yes, he has not been in great form latley as far as test cricket is concerned but he is a terrific batsman and surley would bounce back.

I think people need to realize that Tendulkar is just one man. Unfortunatley whenever he shines he doesnt get the support from the other end and he has to try and pull it off on his own. A prime example would be the last time Pakistan played in India. The test that Pakistan won by 12 runs. Had Tendulkar gotten any support from the other end India would have won that match easily. He stayed there for a very long time. And his departure opened the inroads for a Pakistani comeback. Where were all those great batsman at that time??? So personally I firmly believe Tendulkar is still India’s best batsman. Dravid is a very good batsman but he just isnt in the same league (I beleive no one is) as Tendulkar.

Well put LM.I agree.Definitly this is Dravid's moment.But Sachin is sure the best batsman of India.Everyone has high and low point in their caree.This happens to be probably Dravid's high and Tendi's low point. Both are class act .Media has been too critical of Sachin but heis also blamed for it.He has done so good in past that anythign short of exceptional is not good enough for his fans.He has just raised the bar too high.

LM and F&B.. I agree,, Tendulkar is a great batsman,, but yaar, I like dravid more, ( from the begining),.. and he never letme down as well.. while Tendulkar has quite a lot of time... any way both are great,, but Dravid is the Best :)...

The Game Responds:

      *Nobody is being unfair to him. He is just too over-rated, and the people are finally realizing it (I had realized that when I was just a freakin' kid!). People, That Is All.*

Tendulkar can never be over-rated. He has displayed his genius time and time again.
Having said that, I must say that LahoriMunda above gives the wrong example of the Madras test that Pak won by 12 runs. That was one rare occasion, when I hated Tendulkar. I recall, even Gavaskar(who is normally "politically correct") made comments against Tendulkar at that time. Tendulkar could have easily won that match for India by just staying at the wicket. To be fair to him, he did single handedly bring India to a position where India could smell victory. But just then he literally gifted his wicket by going for a needless slog.

In the end analysis, Sachin is still a great batsman with a solid temperament and the word "over rated" can never apply to him.

The PWC ratings show him number 1 for ODI, and nowhere in top 10 for tests.

May be he is more of ODI expert than tests? Dravid excelled in tests and hence number 2 in test ratings.

yes ur right :halo:

I think Allan Border put it very well here.
One dont need to put Sachin down to proof Dravid is great.

It does not get better than what Rahul Dravid did in this Test. His batting was outstanding. Everyone has already exhausted superlatives so I would not bother myself with any additional praise but you could be sure my admiration for him has grown tremendously.

While his batting is the talk of town, I think it was his catch of Damien Martyn on the fourth afternoon which set up the game for India.

Martyn and Waugh had laid the basis of what appeared to be a big stand, recovery was well and truly underway when Dravid stuck his hand out and caught Martyn in the slips.

I thought he had gone too much into his shell on the previous tour. Now he has matured and plays with the confidence of a grown-up bat. His shot selection was out-of-ordinary and he chose the right ball to attack.

VVS Laxman once again confirmed what a thorn he has been to the Australians in the recent past. I cannot believe, till recently, Laxman was not an automatic choice for India’s playing eleven.

We thought India must have been a tremendous outfit to leave a player of his calibre out of the team. He seems inspired by the challenge and reserves his best against the best attack of the world. He might be a bit unorthodox but that too not on the side of erring.

The way Laxman attacked the Australian bowling in the second innings when he hit some critical fours in no time, showed the self-belief which is running through his veins. Stuart MacGill played an absolute second fiddle to him. It was engaging stuff.

I thought the Australians were victims of their own attacking nature. They were too flamboyant for their own good in this Test match. They should have given respect to the conditions. It is dangerous to be loose in your methods when things are not quite suited to your style of play. They should have given credit to the conditions.

Even though none of Indian medium-fast bowlers enjoy a massive reputation, Australians should have been been aware young and fresh bowlers could bowl with a degree of edge. The world champions lost a few early wickets and there was no coming back.

Usually in the past, it is Gilchrist or Steve Waugh who lift a side out of the mire when wickets have fallen cheaply. Quite a few times in the past, we have seen Australia slip to 265 for 5 or thereabout and then Gilly and Tugga have taken us past the 400-run mark at least. There was no such revival this time. Gilchrist made a misjudgment with his sweep.

It was particularly distressing to see from an Australian point of view, to let Tendulkar take those two crucial wickets with his leg-spinners. Somehow the little genius finds a way to torment us with bat or ball. Australia might have subconsciously underestimated the Indians. They were playing in their own backyard, have been in good form so there could have been a certain degree of complacency.

It could creep into your game. But by the evidence of the first two games, it is not what Australia needs in the remaining games.

I am not too distraught with the Australian performance. They had some poor flip of luck when Brad Williams and Jason Gillespie were missing from the action at critical times. There are no excuses though the better side has won in Adelaide.

It nicely sets up the rest of the series which could only be good for the game. As Steve Waugh said, Australia must do an India and respond to this challenge.

It is apparent Sourav Ganguly and his men have been mentally prepared for this tour and have done their homework. They have a good coach and they are bearing the fruits of their hard work. It is for Australia now to pull themselves up from the floor and respond.

There are moments in a Test, certain twists and turns, which shift the balance. It was one such moment, to be followed up with the catch of Stephen Waugh.

Dravid’s rearguard batting in the first innings revived the Indians . His second knock ensured the good work was not wasted. It is good to see good guys don’t end up as losers all the time.

There is no need to bring Sachin Tendulkar into the equation and begin comparisons between him and Dravid. For me, Tendulkar has always been the man towards whom Indian cricket has turned to quite so often in the past. Dravid had been solid but an unsung hero. Only now he is coming onto his own. He nearly never lets you down and the series has begun brilliantly for him.

It is quite a contrast to the fate Dravid had suffered the last time around. There was no respite for him with the quality bowling which Australians commanded in Glenn McGrath and Shane Warne.

The Game Responds:

      *Remember the 1996 World Cup when Sachin was going great on 80 against Australia and got out and India lost? Remember in Sharjah in 1998 against England in Sharjah when he was batting on 90 odd and got stumped and India lost? Remember the Madras test? He can't freakin' win games. He chokes. Remember the test in West Indies when India needed some 120 runs to win and the "little champion" couldn't do anything? God, there are so many examples, it will take me an entire day to mention them all. Blistering one day centuries against Sri Lankan and Zimbabwean attacks on Asian wickets should never give someone a status of the "World's best batsman". Indians are just in denial. People, That Is All.*

Dravid is da best!
Way better then Sachin in test.
Sachin is an entertainer but Dravid is the match winner.
I would pick The Wall over 10dulker anyday.