BCCI blocks technology for England tour

India’s forthcoming tour of England will take place without the use of the Decision Review System (DRS), after the Board for Control of Cricket in India officially informed the England & Wales Cricket Board that they would be unwilling to embrace the use of technology.

The news comes as a blow to England, who - despite some teething problems on their tours of West Indies and South Africa in recent years - have become increasingly astute in their use of the review system. Graeme Swann has been a particular beneficiary of Hawk-Eye replays, with 29.71% of his 138 Test wickets coming via lbw decisions, the highest proportion for an offspinner in Test history.

“The England team are comfortable with the use of DRS, but the BCCI have advised us that they won’t be willing to sanction its use during the Test and one-day series,” an ECB spokesman told ESPNcricinfo. “Both boards have to agree to the technology being in place for it to happen, so it doesn’t look as though it will be used this summer.”

DRS technology has been used without incident during the current Test series between England and Sri Lanka, with the addition of Hot Spot replays helping to diffuse a potentially controversial caught-behind verdict against Kumar Sangakkara in Cardiff. Despite no visible deviation through to the keeper, a thin white mark on the edge of Sangakkara’s bat helped to confirm that he had touched the ball, and at the close of play, his captain Tillakaratne Dilshan conceded that the right decision had been reached.

India, by contrast, have been reluctant participants, most notably during the recent World Cup, when Ian Bell was ruled not out during the tied match against India, because the batsman had advanced more than 2.5m down the wicket, at which point the parameters for Hawk-Eye’s tracking system are deemed unreliable. “The adulteration of technology with human thinking meant we didn’t get that wicket,” said India’s captain, MS Dhoni, at the conclusion of the match.

Dhoni’s outspoken opposition to DRS is backed by other senior players within the Indian squad, including Sachin Tendulkar, and as a consequence the BCCI is willing to take a stand on the issue. “Our official position on DRS remains unchanged,” an Indian board official told ESPNcricinfo. “To implement UDRS you need the agreement between the two participating nations. Now with the BCCI not supporting DRS, the ECB cannot force it on us.”

India’s stance leaves the future of DRS in doubt, given that the ICC’s cricket committee recommended in May that technology ought to be incorporated in all forms of the game. There had been moves to make DRS mandatory at the ICC’s annual board meeting in June, but the BCCI’s opposition will be hard to overcome.

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/england-v-india-2011/content/current/story/518619.html?comments=all#comments

OK whats the problem why India doesnt want to use the UDRS in their every series …This is disgusting…ICC should take a look at this and make it compulsory for every Test Series

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

If they had their way, they will probably take us back to 70s and 80s era when umpires were blinded by bias (no neutral umpires).

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

I really dont get this BCCI's total refusal. Can they really not see that despite its flaws, its not a bad thing to have?

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

@ Waleed and others.

ICC did consider it (Indian Cricket Council) and they agree.

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

Fk i dont get it either. The drs might not be perfected but its still better than nothing?

I dont understand this rule that both countries need to agree. It should be the host country's call!

Whats the bcci doing to improve the drs system that they hate soo much???

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

Rubbish and blah blah... :D

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

okay so let me get this straight.....you block a technology because it is not 100% accurate and choose the alternative (naked eye umpiring) which is less than 50% accurate (in terms of LBW decisions anyways).

I can undertstand why certain politicians in the garb of BCCI officials can take moronic decisions but I don't understand the reluctance of so-called "senior players" like Tendu, Dhoni etc in using DRS.

Thick heads.

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

^I want a commentator or a live show host to ask the players or the BCCI this question live.. I want to see a response live..

Just because you had one bad experience with it? Illogical.

Can somebody please help me with WHY both countries need to approve the use of DRS? Why isn't it just the host country's call? Isnt the selection of type of ball choice of the host country? Why is this different?

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

^^ in eng, the ball for the test matches was ( I am noit sure if the process has changed) chosen by the captain who wins the toss for the picking the make of the ball. this toss is done saperate than the toss for the game.

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

India had one bad experience in Ian bell. But wasn’t sachin saved by the same? :hoonh:

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

If Sachin would not have given Not Out India would have been bundled out for around 200 in the semis

Its just they wanna show their power and everyones knows BCCI runs ICC

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

^The bad experience that turned the indian players and BCCI against the DRS was NOT in the WC. It was years ago when it was first tested in a SL IND test series in SL. India just happened to be on the wrong foot for most of the calls there.. more compared to SL.. so the indian players just got bitter about it.. and for some stupid reason that feeling has lingered on for years and has translated into the BCCI bullying other boards on the issue.

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

Agreed 100%. No system is perfect. But to go backwards is not a solution.

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

Exactly..

The DRS, whatever it’s shortcomings, is still more accurate than the naked eye.

Graeme Swann has been a particular beneficiary of Hawk-Eye replays

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland-rugby-team/Allan-Massie-Northern-nations-in.6783310.jp

"Swann has been a beneficiary of the DRS. Almost 30 per cent of his Test wickets have been lbw. Previous generations of slow bowlers were lucky to get any lbw decision when a batsman was hit on the front pad. Now, thanks to technology, umpires are less reluctant to raise the finger, because Hawk-Eye has shown that many more balls which strike batsmen on the front leg would actually go on to hit the wicket than was previously supposed. So I suspect India’s refusal of the DRS will benefit them, and handicap Swann, less than they may hope"

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

Tendulkar has a point..

The DRS has three components

  1. Hawk-Eye
  2. Hot Spot
  3. Snickometer

Hawk-Eye is prone to biased and subjective interpretation as was the case when Ian Bell was controversially reprieved by the third umpire during the world cup

Although it makes sense to use the full technology and standardise DRS across all series and tournaments, I would still argue that Hawk-Eye alone is more accurate than the naked eye

http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/current/story/519312.html

The BCCI’s refusal to accept the Decision Review System (DRS) for the forthcoming tour of England is a clear indication that India’s stand on the subject has not moved from its team’s initial reaction to the referral system in the 2008 series versus Sri Lanka. The system may now have been widely accepted around the world and the technology improved, yet the BCCI has not had any formal meetings with the Indian cricketers about their responses to the DRS in ICC events since their 2008 experience.
Sachin Tendulkar’s name is often taken as one of the two Indian players (captain MS Dhoni the other) who is resistant to the referral system and therefore tacitly responsible for the BCCI’s continuous refusal of the DRS.
On Thursday, Tendulkar reiterated to ESPNcricinfo that he was not against the use of the technology, “I am not against DRS, but I feel it will be more effective with the support of the Snickometer and Hot Spot technology. This will give more consistent results.”
BCCI president Shashank Manohar said to ESPNcricinfo, “I have even told the ICC that we have no problem with Hot Spot. Our objection is to ball tracking… it becomes just a case of someone else’s imagination versus the umpire’s imagination.”
In the case of the England series, the availability of Hot Spot as part of the DRS was ignored when the BCCI decided to turn down the referral system. Hot Spot’s thermal imaging cameras provide an extra layer of information about the point of impact to third umpires that may be able to make up for any possible inaccuracies of the predictor path.
Tendulkar says the merging of all available technology would come closest to 100% accuracy as possible and be of the best use in the DRS. His opinion comes close to that of both Virender Sehwag and Rahul Dravid who expressed support of the referral system, despite the Sri Lanka experience and early technological errors.
In the World Cup, however, Dhoni had called the DRS, the “adulteration” of technology and human decision-making.
More than one player on the Indian team has said in private that the DRS had often benefitted them and the team during the World Cup. Despite having Sehwag two referrals going against him in the semi-finals and the final, he said to a television reporter he still supported the system as it had given him the opportunity to ask for reviews of decisions he doubted."
Yet the DRS and its use depends not on player opinion, but official approval. BCCI officials were due to travel to Australia late last year during the Ashes to study the Virtual Eye technology being used by the official broadcasters Channel 9, but the trip was cancelled. Manohar said a presentation made by the Hawk-Eye to the BCCI in Chennai at the time did not convince the officials of the accuracy of the technology either.
As the BCCI remains adamant about the DRS, its technological base keeps improving. The first pictures of a system called Hot Track were tried out during the Ashes which merged Virtual Eye and Hot Spot, and use the Hot Spot point of impact to give extra information to the predictor path. BBG Sports, the owners of the Hot Spot, now own two new cameras that are being set up to be faster, offering more frames per second, greater clarity and greater flexibility.
**Neither Hot Spot nor the Snicko, is part of the ICC’s list of minimum technology requirements for the DRS. The question of whether there will be changes in the referral requirements or if the DRS should be made mandatory across all series, however, is dependent once again on the ICC’s annual meeting in Hong Kong at the end of this month. **

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

Now I am just confused. Why cant they have all 3 components of DRS for every series?

Re: BCCI blocks technology for England tour

Money likely a factor. I am not sure who funds DRS technology, ICC or the respective boards