BBC World Affairs Editor berates "hysterical" US networks

One thing i wanted to ask British Guppies; the article states that BBC World is not aired in the UK - is that accurate? Why is that?

John Simpson was appointed BBC World Affairs Editor in 1998; in March 1991 he was named Royal Television Society Journalist of the Year, which he shared with BBC Political Editor John Cole - the first time for more than a decade that the honour had been shared; he was awarded a CBE in the Gulf War Honours List announced in June 1991; received the Man Of The Year award in November 1991; in 1996, he won the RTS award for International Current Affairs, a Peabody Trust Award for News and The One World Best Bi-Media News award for the Afghanistan trilogy produced for Newsnight.

(When did Geraldo Rivera become the “star reporter” of Fox News ? That’s like having Jerry Springer as a foreign affairs columnist or something).

Simpson berates ‘hysterical’ US networks, Fiachra Gibbons
The Guardian, 19 October 2002

John Simpson, the BBC correspondent who “liberated” Kabul, has attacked “gonzo” journalists who are cheerleading the world to war.
The veteran world affairs editor, who was smuggled into Afghanistan in an extra large burka and admitted he “got a bit carried away” when he strode into Kabul ahead of Northern Alliance fighters, was withering in his criticism of US news networks.

He reserved most of his derision for Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News channel, which has now overtaken CNN in the States, and its star reporter, Geraldo Rivera, the man it bills as “the world’s greatest war correspondent”.

Fox News was “dysfunctional, grotesquely patriotic and embarrassing” and had mislead the American public after September 11 with “hysterical, excitable reporting”, he told an audience at the Cheltenham Literary Festival, where he was reading from his new book, News From No Man’s Land.

Rivera, he said, had turned up late in Kabul with a pair of pearl-handled pistols boasting that he wanted to bring home the head of Osama bin Laden “and bronze it”.

“He pulled out these pistols and waved them in the air,” he said. “I have my problems with CNN and I sometimes have my problems with the BBC, but I can’t remember seeing anyone doing that before in a live broadcast.”

The result was the US public had been horribly misinformed, he said. “I went to Ground Zero and I found that many people believed US immigration policy was the reason why America was so disliked. Thank God I don’t have to broadcast to them. There is no recognition of linkage with America’s support for Israel. There is a great hunger for information in America which people are not just getting.”

“It was a lot of nonsense that Islam and the west are locked in eternal conflict. It’s purely politics and local politics often at that. Osama bin Laden is primarily motivated by wanting to remove American bases from Saudi Arabia and by the Palestinian problem. It is as small as that.”

Simpson said Saddam Hussein was a regular, “irritable viewer” of his World TV programme on BBC World despite the fact that his deputy, Tariq Aziz, once threatened to “liquidate me if I asked another question… My information is that the main oilfields are already mined, ready for exploding… In 1991, I thought it was just a question of getting down to the war and the Iraqis will collapse, which is indeed what happened. This time I don’t think it is going to be quite that easy.”

He said George Bush was a man of below average intelligence and a “glovepuppet of his vice-president, Dick Cheney, and defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld”.

In a passionate defence of BBC World he said it should be funded by the state “given its huge importance in terms of Britain’s standing in the world”. He said it was wrong that, given its average audience of a quarter of a billion people, it had to survive on a shoestring budget and was not shown in Britain.

Finally, he hinted that his own love/hate relationship with the corporation might not last much longer: “I still love the BBC, but I could tell you some stories. I’m too old to sulk, too old to care, though I test it to extremes. I’ll have to pay my own way, too, quite soon, I think.”

I find BBC World to be of better quality than any US broadcast. US TV news is the tunnel vision version.

haha and gerlado as a "serious" war reporter, I still recall his sensationalized vault of al capone fiasco :) Fox is a mess.

Re: BBC World Affairs Editor berates “hysterical” US networks

*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *
One thing i wanted to ask British Guppies; the article states that BBC World is not aired in the UK - is that accurate? Why is that?

Nadia, it is available in the UK, I have listened to it on many occasions. In my opinion the BBC has the best Radio service in the world, its unbiased and independent coverage is what is lacking in the US media, I think US guppies (agreed with Tomasso) should stop listening to radio stations / tv channels which are sensationalising another war against Iraq and depicting a very racist attitude. They should instead listen to TRUTHFUL coverage from the BBC… To find out the frequencies for your own area please click the following link. BBC WORLD SERVICE

The BBC is available on the net, of course, in radio format, as well as electric print. BBC World is aired on some PBS stations at the two extremes of the day where I am at. These programs are broadcast as live news. They air at 6:00AM and 11:00PM and both are offered by two separate channels; one for the morning and one for evening. Their presentation of the news is as the US TV media used to report. It is mostly not spun like the domestic version is wont to.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by TOMASSO: *
The BBC is available on the net, of course, in radio format, as well as electric print. BBC World is aired on some PBS stations at the two extremes of the day where I am at. These programs are broadcast as live news. They air at 6:00AM and 11:00PM and both are offered by two separate channels; one for the morning and one for evening. Their presentation of the news is as the US TV media used to report. It is mostly not spun like the domestic version is wont to.
[/QUOTE]

There is a BBC America too, I get it on Dishnetwork! BBC Asia is the best news channel if you're in Pakistan, followed closely by CNN, primarily because the formers coverage on Asia is much more in depth.

I thought all media was controlled by Jews. Who owns BBC??

Secondly, what kind of editorial stance Beeb has taken regarding the Northern Ireland problem?

I saw Panorama yesterday and standards seem to have slipped quite a lot on BBC recently as well if that's anything to judge by.

The actual news service itself is still not too bad, understandable natural bias withstanding.

BBC is owned by the British Public who fund it by yearly license fees.

It is an independant Corporation.. and therefore its independence from the "official line".

There are a number of different BBC channels and most of the programmes which are broadcast on BBC World are broadcast locallly as well.

Many thanks, everyone.... really appreciate the replies.
As for Canada, BBC is accessible via cable - CBC airs it every weekday around 5 pm (Toronto time).

Interestingly enough, there is a world of difference between the CNN edition broadcast in the US, versus CNN Asia.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by TOMASSO: *
I find BBC World to be of better quality than any US broadcast. US TV news is the tunnel vision version.
[/QUOTE]

Yes, but channels like Fox News seem to be outdoing CNN and others in grabbing viewers, by playing up animosity towards Muslims and the outside world. Hence John Simpson has a valid point.