http://www.pakistanlink.com/Opinion/2002/May/10/08.html
A former PM who first tacitly approves of the death of muslims in Israel. Now is responsible for the whole F 16 fiasco. Now this is a woman who would like to stop the nuclear program of Pakistan and wanted to teach the army a lesson? Some patriot she is. I wonder why she even bothers to run for elections. Ah yes i forgot. To loot and plunder our nation.
This letter from the link above was printed in major newspapers in Pakistan when it was leaked out.
**Mrs. Benazir Bhutto
Bilawal House Karachi
Dear Peter Galbraith:
I don’t know how to thank you, for your favors to me and my family. As you know that the orders of my dismissal were drafted in the JAG branch of the GHQ, and it was not possible for me to pull along with the army and they subverted my government.
I have already communicated to various friends in the Congress and especially Stephen Solarz, to use their good office with the President Bush, so as to put maximum pressure on President Ishaq, and the army in Pakistan, that they do not disqualify me from the elections, as it will be unjust and negation of all democratic principles for which we have struggled.
It would be most appropriate if military as well as economic assistance to Pakistan is stopped, and all the international agencies like the World Bank, IMF, are told to squeeze the Government of Pakistan and if possible all supply to Pakistan should be disrupted so that normal life in Pakistan comes to stand still.
As long as I was the Prime Minister, I kept a check on the nuclear device, but now I do not know what are the plans of the Government.
The suspension of F-16 and its spares will bring the army to its senses.
Dear Peter, please use your influence on V.P. Singh, the Indian Prime Minister, to engage the Pakistan army on the borders, so that they do not impede my way. I wish Rajiv Gandhi had been the Prime Minister of India, things would have been easier.
Thank you and with warm regards.
Sincerely Yours
Sgd. Benazir Bhutto
Dated: 24-09-1990**
It would be most appropriate if military as well as economic assistance to Pakistan is stopped, and all the international agencies like the World Bank, IMF, are told to squeeze the Government of Pakistan and if possible all supply to Pakistan should be disrupted so that normal life in Pakistan comes to stand still.
oh my God - did she actually argue for this ?
What is wrong with her, what does she want from Pakistan? 
She’s plundered the country left right and centre and yet still she pokes her nose where it’s not wanted. Araam sai bethti keoun nahin hai apnai ghaR main khamoshi sai, she’s done enuf looting to live out the rest of her life lavishly.
These type of letters always appear before elections! usually ny Jamait-e-Islami..
Re: BB now a traitor to Pakistan
… and why people of paksitan vote for her in such large numbers? since they trust her more than some who fabricate ur above mentioned assumptions.. she has been termed as anti-muslims, anti-Pakistanis and above all she is a woman what a degrace to Islamic country having woman as its leader!
CM
I've mentoined the news article [F-16] probably three weeks ago.
In her defense, why does army need f-16's anyway when people don't have enough to eat?
Re: BB now a traitor to Pakistan
BB knows nothin’ expect producing babies and livin’ with the most disgraceful husband. hell to BB.. I will not marry her daughter ever…
No No donot say her a traitor.she is hawah ki baeti
I thought BB stood for Biggest B**** but it stands for benazir buttho , well in both cases there is not much of a difference.
She’s one sick sob!!! She should be exiled for life.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?p...9-10-2002_pg7_1
BB lobbies Rocca against Musharraf
By Khalid Hasan
Washington: Benazir Bhutto, chairperson of the Pakistan People’s Party, met Christina Rocca, assistant secretary of state for South Asia, on Monday afternoon.
Although she has been received at the State Department whenever she has come to Washington, the “level” has been considerably lower. That she is now being received by the key South Asian official at the State Department indicates the seriousness with which Ms Bhutto is being taken in Washington after the impressive performance of her party in the elections.
Ms Bhutto impressed upon Ms Rocca the “futility and lack of wisdom” of “placing all of America’s eggs in Musharraf’s basket”. She also briefed the US official on what she calls “the games being played by the army with the politicians.” She told Pakistani journalists on Saturday that given the current circumstances and the ongoing war on terrorism, US military presence in Pakistan was necessary for Pakistan’s security. This very assurance, Ms Bhutto personally extended to the United States through Ms Rocca. The Bush administration takes its “war on terrorism” with the greatest seriousness and it would feel reassured by Ms Bhutto’s clear and unreserved message of support.
The PPP leader also gave the State Department her view of Gen. Musharraf’s post-election strategy, pointing out that he is “playing both sides of the street”. She spoke about the great tolerance the military regime had shown for radical elements and religious zealots, stressing that the army did not want a meaningful civilian order to return to Pakistan and had been playing one political group against another, as well as making alluring offers to different political leaders in order to divide them and to subvert the resurgence of a true democratic order in Pakistan.
Ms Bhutto also met the editorial board of the Washington Post Monday. In the next few days, she is also planning to meet important figures on Capitol Hill, as well as senior officials at the Pentagon and the National Security Council.
On Sunday night, Ms Bhutto was hosted to dinner by Dr Nisar Chaudhry, president of the Pakistani-American Congress. Present on the occasion were Walter Anderson, director of policy and planning at the State Department, Stephen Cohen, noted South Asia expert and Ben Barber of the Washington Times who has a special interest in South Asia.
Ms Bhutto is also planning to hold discussions at the capital’s leading think tanks.
Degas people havent voted for her .....they have voted for a person whether good or bad standing from there constituency ...I know she is at the top of the hierarchy but this time there was a common notion in every pakistani ...." that we dont care from which party a person stands but if he can do a good job for the country we will vote for him/her."
Which is a very educated approach as ppl were fed up of PPP and PMLN tearing the country apart among themselves .....
That is why such unexpected results came out of the elections.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Poodenay_Ki_Chutney: *
That is why such unexpected results came out of the elections.
[/QUOTE]
Boy, that sure was a naive comment. Everything was planned by the you know who and company..... It is always the same story, the manipulations by the army are covered by our so called political observers as the rejection of the policies of that sprcific political parties...and so on.....but the fact is that had the leaders of the two main parties been in Pakistan, the results would have differed to a great extent, even though the govt. of General Musharraf would still have had its own way.
We the people end up loosing anyway.
do you think the army does not know the money is taken out of pakistan
by politicians? why did they wait until treasury is emptied?
This is another one for Benazir supporters, what exactly is the meaning of the part bolded above?
Isn’t Miss Bhutto clearly projecting herself as “an egg in the american basket”.
This should be an interesting one to see. How the bhutto supporters put a spin on this one would be most interesting though again it isn’t difficult to imagine given their usual lack of comprehension to everything their ‘leader’ says.
You must be an Indian
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
In her defense, why does army need f-16's anyway when people don't have enough to eat?
[/QUOTE]
Your argument is very silly. India has and is getting latest military equipment. You can't expect our Armed Forces to fight a treacherous enemy with bows and arrows. As far as eating is concerned, more Indians are hungry as compared to Pakistanis.
Wait weren the elections rigged? hmmm....if the elections werent rigged then the PPP didnt get that much. Rather the PML Q got better and the MMA was just as close. So the PPP is a run of the mill party. However if it was rigged, what Degas says has nothing to stand on...So which one is it guys?
This is a letter from Dawn. I must say, this guy has raised valid questions.
Benazir Doing No Good To Pakistan
According to a news report (Dawn Oct 29), PPP Chairperson Benazir Bhutto has stated before a group of intellectuals and journalists in the US state of Maryland that the Taliban and Al Qaeda elements have started to regroup in Pakistan.
She has also said that this is a threat to American interests in the South Asian region. However, the most unfortunate part of her statement is where she says that there have been attacks on US and Western targets in South Asia, Yemen and Bali and it is only a matter of time before there is another attack.
Clearly, Ms Bhutto is implicating Pakistan, though indirectly, in the bombing incidents in Yemen and Bali. Moreover, she has described the victory of the Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal as the beginning of “Talibanization” of Pakistan.
May I ask Ms Bhutto how she, while in exile, can know so accurately that Al Qaeda members are regrouping in Pakistan although the FBI and the CIA have faced no hindrances, whatsoever, in Pakistan in their ongoing hunt for the Taliban and Al Qaeda men?
**The recent arrest of Dr Amir Aziz, an orthopaedic surgeon of Lahore, on a charge that he had provided medical treatment to Osama bin Laden makes it abundantly clear that no one can even sympathize with the Taliban or the Al Qaeda in Pakistan, what to speak of regrouping by their men.
And how does Ms Bhutto know for sure that the attacks off the coast of Yemen and in Indonesia’s Bali island are linked to the alleged regrouping by the Al Qaeda activists in Pakistan? By claiming that Pakistan is becoming Talibanized, is she inviting the United States to deal with Pakistan the way America dealt with Afghanistan? Or is she suggesting that her return to Pakistan will stop this so-called process of Talibanization? **
In my view, the victory of the MMA in a good number of National Assembly constituencies, as well as in the two provinces, is the most likely response of the people of Pakistan to certain steps taken by the military government, specially the government’s allout support to the US for the so-called war on terror.
Is Ms Bhutto pleading to the world to reject the will of the people of Pakistan? What exactly is she trying to achieve?
I believe that Ms Bhutto’s latest statements and actions show her contempt for Pakistanis who elected her their country’s prime minister twice, but she let them down. I want her to know that she is doing no good to her country by making such irresponsible public statements.
SALMAN MAHMOOD
Islamabad
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by CM: *
Wait weren the elections rigged? hmmm....if the elections werent rigged then the PPP didnt get that much. Rather the PML Q got better and the MMA was just as close. So the PPP is a run of the mill party. However if it was rigged, what Degas says has nothing to stand on...So which one is it guys?
[/QUOTE]
it is not fully rigged there some mixture of both.
Ah ok rvikz. Now i get it. Both camps are happy this way right? The parties who did bad claim it was rigged like PML N and those who did well like MMA say it wasnt. I am shocked...how could that be possible?