Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

Dogs often bark this time its a kala kutta barking, beside making halfa$$ statements for political gains is not out of the ordinary.. Its for home consumption.

Excerpt from your link.

President Bush, who telephoned Pakistani president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf today said that “the United States fully respected Pakistan’s sovereignty and appreciated Pakistan’s resolve in fighting Al-Qaeda and other terrorist elements,” according to a statement issued by the Pakistani foreign ministry. It added that Mr. Bush said statements regarding future United States military action inside Pakistan “were unsavory and often prompted by political considerations in an environment of electioneering. He agreed that such statements did not serve the interests of either country.”

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

And what is ur contribution to fix it? may i ask!!!

Read my reply again untill u understand it.

The haterdness against Pakistan has made u forgotton that none of these mullah have existed, none of these marshal laws lasted if it was not America on their back...

They nourish these mullah to use them against Russia and then let them threw them away like a used tissue paper... ( and they back-fired)

All the Marshal Laws were by the approval of White house!!! none of these military dictator has balls to take over the country if they don't have White House as their Khana Ka'abah...

I hope u may understand what i wrote here!!!

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

Obama does not have a hope in hell of becoming the next US President, so he can bark as much as he wants.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

As much as I'd oppose any action against Pakistan, it is the center of terrorism.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2007/08/biden_no_fan_of.html

Joe Biden wanted to attack terrorists in Pakistan long time back…

At today’s National Press Club luncheon designed to promote his newly-published memoir, “Promises to Keep,” Sen. Joe Biden characterized Sen. Barack Obama’s pledge to hunt down terrorists in Pakistan as old news, noting that he had been proposing such action for “five years.” Asked if Obama’s speech this a.m. was a good idea or showed the junior senator’s inexperience in foreign policy, Biden said: “Yes.” Asked again, Biden elaborated, saying “I’ve been proposing we pursue al Qaeda in Pakistan for five years.” Biden went on to say that the “last thing you want to do” is announce to the people of Pakistan that you’re going to violate their sovereignty. He said such action would force Pakistani Pres. Pervez Musharraf to make deals with various factions. Biden noted as POTUS you simply take action.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

They will attack Pakistan sooner or later. FACT.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

^ no need. Let it implode and crumble upon itself. the comes slicing and dicing.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

Pathetic wet dreams! of beghiarat Arab slaves!

Salivating about destruction of Pakistan will have their tents burned first. These depraved souls sleep on the heaps of sand during the day and chase she-camels all night.

What do these people know about life and culture. Poor nomads!

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

What did I tell ya!!!

‘Obama targeted Pakistan to get boost in polls’ :D

Daily Times Monitor

LAHORE: Barack Obama was trying to give a boost to his poll ratings when he declared on Wednesday that he was prepared to unilaterally send US troops into Pakistan to get terrorists, states Pramit Pal Chaudhuri of the Hindustan Times.

Chaudhuri says Obama was not trying to warn President General Pervez Musharraf, but was instead attempting to impress the US public with his firm stance on an issue of war.

In his speech, Obama argued he would withdraw US soldiers from Iraq, but increase their numbers in Afghanistan. He also alleged that Musharraf hadn’t done enough in the fight against Al Qaeda. This appeared to be in direct response to a poll by American Research Group that showed Clinton had a 21-point lead over Obama after he said he was prepared to “unconditionally” meet leaders like Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmedinejad and North Korea’s Kim Jong-Il.

According to Chaudhuri, taking a firm stance on Pakistan is useful to Obama for three reasons: First, it allows the senator to show himself to be “hard-nosed on security” while portraying him as different from the mainstream. He says irrespective of ideological persuasion, almost all US citizens would disrespect a US president who would let another government veto an attack on Osama Bin Laden. “Obama’s position is actually the same as President George W Bush,” points out Ashley Tellis, senior associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “US homeland security advisor, Frances Townsend, said exactly this.” However, publicly the Bush administration has had to say it would not violate Pakistani “sovereignty”.

Second, Pakistan is an easy target after growing concerns in Washington following the revival of Al Qaeda in Pakistan’s tribal areas. “You are likely to see many more statements across the political spectrum focusing on the situation in this remote part of northwest Pakistan,” says Lisa Curtis, South Asia expert at the Heritage Foundation.

Third, the speech still allows Obama to retain his advantage over Clinton — that of her voting in favour of the US invasion of Iraq. Obama has carefully distinguished between “the wrong war” in Iraq and “the right war” in Afghanistan. “If the Democrats insist on the US troop withdrawal from Iraq, they have to demonstrate they are as patriotic as any Republican. So Afghanistan, and now Pakistan, are the two places where a consensus is developing,” says Frederic Grare, a Washington-based expert on Pakistan..

Most analysts, meanwhile, believe that Obama’s speech will mark the beginning of a Democratic foreign policy debate that would go beyond calls for a troop withdrawal from Iraq, added Chaudhuri.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

After watching the whole situation closely, i have come to a conclusion that Obama and politicians like him are no different than a 3rd rated politicians of Pakistan,

In Pakistan these politician condemn USA and India and threaten them and all kind of crap. So now Americans have started the same, but the difference is the 1st and 2nd rate Politicians in Pakistan ( one who stand for premiership etc) never ever use this kind of language.. but one can see that America's presidential candidates standard had fallen to a 3rd rated Pakistani Politician.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

Rudy Giuliani said he agreed with Barack Obama on invading Pakistan on Charlie Rose program.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

whose rudy???

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

As I said before, this is not about Obama but about the overall tone. Obama was just piling on but if we recall, the White House, State Dept and the US military have all said that they will not rule out ordering strikes on Pakistani targets.

http://www.dawn.com/2007/08/05/top15.htm

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

And yet he does not get as much condemnation.
Giuliani is the one demanding Dems to use the words "ISLAMIC terrorism". Being the Jewish Zionist, he gets support from Zionist lobbies as well.
Personally, I hope he becomes the next US president. He can't be worse than Bush or Obama as far as Muslims are concerned.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

Giulani is an Italian origin Catholic. Let's not try to see Jewish conspiracies where they don't exist. The fact of the matter is that the behaviour of a few Muslims living in America and Europe has made life dangerous for the rest of us. As far as the threat to Pakistan is concerned, I hope the Republican debate today made it clear to doubters that people from both parties see Pakistan as a threat. The only difference is that some candidates want to attack in secret while others like Obama want to do it openly.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

unlike pakistani government, american govt cares about the lives of its citizens. u.s. would therefore attack the u.k. if it had evidence that terrorist in the u.k. were about to target americans and u.k. govt was not going to act against the terrorist.

if we pakistanis dont want to get in the american line of fire, we should not give shelter to people who want to kill americans. i just hope and prey that pak has no connection with the next attack on u.s. soil.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

Kala Obama Nukes Himself …(The mushroom cloud,fellow Democratic candidates exploding) :smiley:

Human Events ^ | 08/06/2007 | Buzz Petterson
Posted on 08/06/2007 5:08:29 AM PDT by IrishMike

When I was an Air Force pilot flying during the heightened tensions of the Cold War we carried “flash goggles” in our cockpits in the event we might be exposed to a nuclear detonation. The theory was that, without the goggles, the flash of a nuclear weapon would be so intense as to blind us rendering us incapable of completing our missions as we defended our nation.

Put on your flash goggles America. The mushroom cloud you see on the horizon is Barack Hussein Obama’s presidential viability, and that of his fellow Democratic candidates, exploding.

Obama is proving himself just another in the long line of Democrats who are incapable and unqualified of assuming the challenges and responsibilities required of America’s commander-in-chief. In the last two weeks, presidential candidate Obama has volunteered that, if elected, he would sit down with our enemies without preconditions, would not use nuclear weapons under “any circumstance,” and would attack the sovereignty of Pakistan, one of our closest allies in the global war with Islamofascism.

How clueless can you be and still run for the White House? Obama provides the answer. On July 23, Obama told a CNN/You Tube debate audience that he would be willing to sit down with America’s enemies, namely Iran’s Ahmadinejad, Syria’s Assad, North Korea’s Kim Jong-Il and Venezuela’s Chavez, without hesitation or consideration for the effects on America’s national security. Perhaps, this was an extemporaneous response on his part and one we could excuse as a fumble while carrying the ball under the pressure of a hard-fought campaign.

Just last week, however, he delivered a speech at the Woodrow Wilson International Center and threatened one of America’s closest allies in the war on terrorism, Pakistan’s President Pervez Musharraf. “Let me make this clear,” Obama said, “If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.” Obama’s naivete is astonishing. Choosing to shift the fight from Iraq, where we are fighting and killing Al Qaeda, to the land of an ally whose president is precariously close to losing control to homegrown Islamofascists, is stupefying.

No doubt if given the option, our enemy Al Qaeda would be thrilled to exchange the prospect of controlling Iraq and its oil fields for Pakistan’s cache of nukes. Roughly 90 percent of Pakistan’s population would support an overthrow of Musharraf in favor of a much more fundamentalist and Sharia-based government. The troubling nature of Obama’s veiled threat to the Pakistani government is that in this case these were prepared remarks.

The very next day, whatever small ration of credibility the Democratic candidate retained regarding national security, was lost. Speaking to the Associated Press, Obama stammered “I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance…involving civilians.” Desperately seeking to recover, he said, “Let me scratch that. There’s been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That’s not on the table.”

The only comfort we can take from this incredibly ignorant gaffe is that the “nuclear football” – the codes and other matters that enable the president to use nuclear weapons – rests at the side of President George Bush and not that of the junior senator from Illinois. My new book, War Crimes: The Left’s Campaign to Destroy Our Military and Lose the War on Terror, documents the various elements of the de facto alliance of American institutions, organizations and politicians opposed to our victory in Iraq. The service and sacrifice of our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines and our nation’s national security are the undeserving victims. This alliance of Americans (nominally) is comprised of anti-war organizations, academics in our educational system, elements of mainstream media, Hollywood popular culture and, yes, Democrat politicians.

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

JaanBaazz, you are trying to talk sense into someone like Prince Abbas ? :eek:

Prince Abbas probably thinks you are a Zionist Jew for pointing out that Giuliani is an Italian Catholic and not a Zionist Jew :omg:

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan

But according to Loose Change, the great documentary which revels the truth behind 9/11, it says that american government caused 9/11 which means americans don't care about american lives.... :D

Re: Barack Obama says he will order invasion of Pakistan


Pakistan is a breeding ground for hundreds if not thousands of terrorists. They hide in caves and train. The Pakistani government has shown zero initiative in trying to cleanse out these people. These terrorists are responsible for 9/11 and countless other attacks. If Musharaf or any other Pakistani PM refuses to acknowledge this then America will.

I know you guys like to show off your paki pride and hate on the guy. But the man speaks the truth. Most of you are blinded by the fact that he wants to attack Pakistan. He wants to attack the caves in which terrorists are hiding in, not civilians.