Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

What a load of crap!! I know Balochistan inside out. Walk in ANY department in Balochistan and from peon to the director, ALL are BALOCHS. The CM is Baloch, the CS is Baloch all the heads of ALL the govt. departments are Balochs..hell, all the peons are Balochs. They don't know crap, are incompetent and corrupt, but have been given cushy jobs just because they are Balochs. Balochs are doing the worst discrimination in the world by illegally usurping ALL the jobs in Balochistan regardless of their qualifications and competence.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

The economy of whole Pakistan not only Baluchistan has to be lifted as it is touching new lows due to corruption and mis-management. Everyone in Pakistan is frustrated with this mis-management not only Baluchis.. They are just venting their frustrations in a different manner.

To solve the problem of Baluchistan we need to divide the problem in two distinct parts..

A) The Problem of Sardars:

Having lived in Karachi during my youth days I have seen the families of Bugtis, Zehris, and Marris etc. All their children used to drive fancy cars and were sort of gangsters who had a fleet of personal armed people around them.. not missing any opportunity to create trouble. These Sardars used to get direct Bhattas from the government of Pakistan and all the lavish life style was maintained through these bhattas. None of the families used to live in their villages.. where Sardars just maintained their private armies to safeguard their fiefdoms.

Musharraf stoppped these bhattas and these Sardars got angry and turned against the government. They had these private armies with rocket launchers and every sort of arms and ammunitions. Now these Sardars have turned to some foreign countries to finance their private armies.

What is the solution to this problem.. disband their private armies.. go after their finances.. cut their supplies.. disarm them totally.

B) The problem of general population/masses in Baluchistan:

Their problem is purely economic and solutions are also economic. The first step to solve this economic problem in Baluchistan will be to establish law and order there which can not be done without disbanding these private armies. Create business/increase agriculture opportunities. Establish some tax free zones to boast industrialization..

All type of insurgencies flourish when a country is not doing well economically. I can tell you if Pakistan gets good management and starts doing well on economic front.. all these insurgencies will die automatically. Nobody would like to leave Pakistan to miss the economic boom. People will feel pride in recognizing themselves with Pakistan.. just like what happened in India/China.

You are saying that we were not able to uplift the non-trouble areas in Baluchistan.. we were not able to uplift any area in Pakistan.. leave alone Baluchistan due to this mis-management and corruption. We have not been able to make water reservoirs/dams.. we have not been able to solve our energy issues.. we have not been able to control our exploding population.. we have failed miserably on educational front. And these failures are not just Baluchistan specific. I can tell you once a good management is given in Pakistan all these problems will vanish automatically.. Like Bill Clinton said: “It’s the economy stupid!!!”…

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

I completely agree with this part of your post. I have seen the insurgencies in India vanishing with the improvement of their economy. Indian muslims who used to feel sidelined in the 1990's, now I find (mostly) them to be proud Indians. On the other hand during the late 80's and early 90's when Pakistan was doing reasonably well we were much better integrated, but the problems started appearing with the deterioration of economy. At the moment the Pakistan that we see is mostly Rawalpindi/Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi. The new government should develop those cities further, but the real focus should be in other smaller towns. Doing that the migration of people to bigger cities will be halted and the development will be more evenly distributed throughout the country.

The situation in which we are in now, is mostly due to dictatorship during the 2000's. From 1977 to 2000, the same sardars were in those areas who were politically involved in the process. But due to the operations some of the people became militants, and the other nationalist parties became sidelined. The government needs to differentiate between the nationalists and the separatists, and try to bring the nationalists back into the mainstream. If you see in Indian Held Kashmir Mehbooba Mufti's party which used to be more aligned with APHC and wanted referendum for Kashmir, but once they got involved in the political process now they want the solution within the Indian framework. Because with the nationalists out we are left with PPP, PMLQ, JUI and PMLN in Balochistan. Apart from JUI I am not sure how much the other parties represent the people from that province as the number of seats won by PMLQ and PPP during the previous elections was partly due to the boycott of the elections by the nationalists.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Another opinion ;
Pakistan Today
‎"The dark side of self-determination" - Shaukat Umerhttp://external.ak.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQAcngzrtnayzDHb&w=90&h=90&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.pakistantoday.com.pk%2Fuserphoto%2F137.jpgThe Balochistan Resolution
www.pakistantoday.com.pkFor someone closely involved in promoting Kashmiri self-determination in the United Nations and other forums, one can imagine the chuckles of satisfaction in the Indian Ministry of External Affairs at the affixation of this term to a Pakistani

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

IB advise talks with Baloch separatists | Provinces | DAWN.COM

IB advise talks with Baloch separatists

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

IB is civilian agency , Who cares the bloody civilians .
ايجنسياں بلوچستان ميں حدود ميں رہ کرکام کريں،قائمہ کميٹي برائے دفاع](NetworkedBlogs)

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Read this
minister

http://external.ak.fbcdn.net/safe_image.php?d=AQAp3qlPqlQny8uH&w=90&h=90&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.pakistantoday.com.pk%2F2012%2F02%2FRehman-Malik-2-150x150.jpgSituation in Balochistan better than other provinces: Malik
www.pakistantoday.com.pkInterior Minister Rehman Malik on Wednesday claimed that the situation in Balochistan was better than other provinces of Pakistan.
Must read the comments of the public .
**But true position is here

**
http://dailydunya.com/Archives/february2012/28/news/h n15.gif

http://dailydunya.com/Archives/february2012/28/news/h n1.gif

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

BBC News - Waking up to the war in Balochistan

Waking up to the war in Balochistan

**Attitudes are hardening in Pakistan’s restive Balochistan province against the government, but the state is now belatedly reaching out to the Baloch separatists. Writer Ahmed Rashid considers whether after years of civil war, talks could end the bloodshed.
**
**It took an obscure United States congressman holding a controversial hearing in Washington on the civil war in Balochistan to awaken the conscience of the Pakistani government, military and public.
**
**For years the civil war in Balochistan has either been forgotten by most Pakistanis or depicted as the forces of law and order battling Baloch tribesmen, who are described as “Indian agents”.
**
**Just a few weeks ago, Interior Minister Rehman Malik even hinted that Israel and the US were supporting the Baloch separatists, while the army had totally ‘‘Indianised’’ the Baloch problem.
**
On 23 February, Mr Malik did an about-face, saying that the government was withdrawing all cases against Baloch leaders living in exile and asking them to return home for talks. ‘‘I will receive them in person,’’ he told journalists.

Don’t expect Baloch leaders to turn the other cheek at Mr Malik’s sudden shift - the Baloch have seen too many such U-turns before.

Brahamdagh Bugti, head of the separatist Baloch Republican Party and living in exile in Geneva, remains sceptical.

His grandfather Sardar Akbar Bugti, the head of the Bugti tribe, was killed in 2006 on the orders of former President Pervez Musharraf in a massive aerial bombardment, while his sister Zamur Domki and her 12-year old daughter were gunned down in Karachi in broad daylight just in late January - allegedly by government agents.

He told journalists last week: ‘‘I have seen this all before… I am not an optimist.’’ Nevertheless, for the first time in years his face appeared on every Pakistani TV channel as he and other Baloch leaders gave interviews.

**Broken promises
**
The civil war has left thousands dead - including non-Baloch settlers killed by Baloch militants - and has gone on for the past nine years, but it hardly made the news in Pakistan, let alone abroad.

The fifth Baloch insurgency against the Pakistani state began in 2003 with small guerrilla attacks by autonomy-seeking Baloch groups, who over the years have become increasingly militant and separatist in ideology.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan reported that in 2011 there were 107 new cases of enforced disappearances. The so called ‘‘missing’’ are picked up, tortured, killed and their bodies left by the roadside in what the Baloch call ‘‘a kill and dump policy’’ by state intelligence agencies and the paramilitary Frontier Corps. Thousands of people have disappeared in the past nine years.

In a recent article for Dawn newspaper which generated intense public interest, novelist and satirist Mohammed Hanif described one incident in which a boy was picked up by government agents and went missing for two years before his body turned up.

US Congressman Dana Rohrabacher earned the wrath of the Pakistani establishment when he held a hearing on Balochistan and then introduced a non-binding resolution in Congress that Balochistan should be declared an independent territory.

The government is now calling for an All Parties Conference to discuss Baloch grievances, but Baloch leaders have already said they will not attend.

**Community leaders like Brahamdagh Bugti and Harbayar Marri, a leader of the Balochistan Liberation Army who is in exile in London, have seen two major efforts by Pakistani politicians to talk to them fail in the past nine years - largely due to the army’s intransigence.
**
There has been a hardening of the Baloch attitude and a deepening of the revolt”

**The first was under former President Musharraf when some of his federal ministers tried to hold talks with the Marri and Bugti leaders. They were thwarted by Gen Musharraf who was determined to deal with the issue militarily, taunting the Baloch with quips such as ''this time you won’t even know what hit you".
**
**The second was when the present Pakistan People’s Party government was elected to power in 2008 and President Asif Ali Zardari asked for a ceasefire in Balochistan for six months - which surprisingly was adhered to - and promised negotiations with Baloch leaders. However, the army was against any talks and the government’s will to carry them out melted away.
**
**Writing on the wall
**
Since then, there has been a hardening of the Baloch attitude and a widening and deepening of the revolt. Baloch leaders now openly talk of accepting aid from India and the US if it was available and separating from Pakistan to form a new country - which is anathema to most Pakistanis.

None of the earlier four revolts have received such support from all sections of Baloch society, including the educated middle class. The Baloch diaspora in Europe and the US is especially active.

Although Balochistan is the largest province in Pakistan, the Baloch number only five million people and are outnumbered in their own province by Pashtun tribesmen and other non-Baloch settlers like the Shia Hazaras who arrived in the 19th Century. What also irks the Baloch is that Pakistan allows the Afghan Taliban - who are Pashtun - to run their war against US forces in Afghanistan from Quetta, the provincial capital. The Taliban leadership council is called the Quetta Shura. Pakistan’s authorities deny the claims.

Until now, there has been a kind of ethnic peace between the Baloch and Pakistani and Afghan Pashtuns living in Balochistan, but that could end in a bloodbath. Some right-wing American politicians like Dana Rohrabacher talk of an alliance between Baloch separatists and Afghanistan’s anti-Taliban former Northern Alliance. Such an alliance would jointly take on the Taliban. That is dangerous talk because it could end up with the partitioning of both Pakistan and Afghanistan.

**The Pakistan army needs to see the writing on the wall and swiftly urge the government to open genuine talks and offer real concessions to the Baloch. The Baloch say they are beyond accepting any compromise with the state, but no Pakistani entity has ever tried talking to them.
**
Ahmed Rashid’s book, Taliban, was updated and reissued recently on the 10th anniversary of its publication. His latest book is Descent into Chaos - The US and the Disaster in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

I wish what I wrote was load of craps but it is not. Unfortunately what you wrote is collection of blatant lies. You claimed that you know Baluchistan inside out and then wrote: Walk in ANY department in Baluchistan and from Peon to all directors, ALL are BALOCHS. ALL the HEADs of ALL the govt departments are Balochs.

That means there are no settlers and no Pakhtuns from ‘peon’ to ‘head of department’ in any Baluchistan government departments (Bureaucracy, Police, Judiciary, Education, Mining, Water, Paramilitary, Security, etc).

Are you Nawaz Shareef, as the only person I know in Pakistan who lies so blatantly is NS?

Giving you benefit of doubt, I am assuming that you were just boasting about your Baluchistan knowledge, so can you please confirm that what you wrote you really believe is true and not lies?

Since you claimed that there is no department in Baluchistan headed by non-Baloch, let me give you a hint: Think, who is IG Baluchistan (head of Baluchsitan police department) and what is his name (His name would tell you if he is Baloch or not)?

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Adiala missing inmates: ISI, MI not superior to civilians, says SC – The Express Tribune

Adiala missing inmates: ISI, MI not superior to civilians, says SC

****ISLAMABAD: **The displeased Supreme Court gave out a stern message to Inter-Services Intelligence and Military Intelligence on Thursday: “You need to take this out of your mind that you [ISI and MI] are superior and others [civilians] are inferior.”
**
Counsel of ISI and MI Raja Irshad was reprimanded as the Supreme Court remained unsatisfied with the replies submitted to the court today by the agencies in the Adiala missing prisoners’ case.

Headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, the three-member bench said that the replies submitted to the court do not justify under which law the civilians were picked up by agencies. “Who gave you the right to hound people?” questioned the chief justice.

**“You are so insensitive to the human loss that the families of the missing persons have suffered lately because of you. This is a big allegation against you [ISI and MI] – you abduct people and after some days, their abandoned bodies surface,” said Chief Justice Chaudhry.
**
**“You’re an arsonist. You have set Balochistan on fire,” said Chaudhry while referring to the agencies and the situation in Balochistan. “We ask you time and again and you always tell us stories. Are we here to listen to your stories?”
**
**The chief justice said that the agencies have become “insensitive” to the issues and referred them as the “biggest violators” of the country’s law and order.
**
**Irshad, in the agencies’ defense said that the authorities in the ISI and MI are considering this issue seriously as this is a burning issue of this country.
**
**He said that the “foreign elements” involved in instilling terrorism in Balochistan are active and the agencies cannot work with their “eyes closed” to the issue. The chief justice remarked saying that whatever the agencies do should be done within the limits of law as the agencies are not “above the law”.
**
**Irshad said that current parliament “does not represent the will of the people,” on which the Chief Justice Chaudhry differed and said, “It does represent the will of the people and has also brought the 20[SUP]th[/SUP]amendment for solving issues. If you take them in confidence, they will facilitate you as well.”
**
The court, however, expressed satisfaction over the report submitted by the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa chief secretary about the health condition of the prisoners.

The report had a detailed summary about the prisoners’ health, improvement in their condition and how they are accommodated. The court said that its message should be conveyed to the chief secretary that the court was happy to see that all the questions sought in the previous hearing were answered in the report.

The court also said that the report gives hope that the remaining prisoners will brave their illnesses.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

  • The Chief Minister is Baloch
  • The Chief Secretary is Baloch
  • The Finance Minister is Baloch
  • The governor is Baloch

Want me to continue............of course a few exceptions are always there. Previously used to be that pushtuns had an almost equal share but not any more. The balochs want to keep everything for themselves, plunder other people's wealths, kill them in broad daylight on lisaniat and then play victim and masoom baloch.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

ummm... IG Baluchistan is son of a long time PPP member and appointed on political basis and agreed that IG should be from Baluchistan.

But unlike your assertion, I still do not see long queues of Punjabis wanting to migrate to Baluchistan.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Can't you understand that no one is talking about political posts. We are talking about government employees.

Actually, I know that you understand what we are talking about, else you would not have written that All (every employee) from ‘peon to Head’ of any department in Baluchistan are Baloch. Only thing you are showing is the mind set of ‘may na manoo’ that made Pakistan lose Bangal and now same is happening in Baluchistan.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

I never said that Punjabis are queuing to migrate to Baluchistan. Or did I ... can you please show me? Why do you want to accuse me of something I never said? I think it is attitude and mindset you and some on this forum are showing, that is to show reluctance in accepting the cause and rectifying it, Pakistan lost Bengal.

I only wrote Balochs fears, that if Baluchistan develops then they would see influx of settlers (according to them, Punjabi settlers), so it is better that Baluchistan do not develop, rather get independence.

Many Balochs think that Pakistan and Pakistani establishment wants to colonise Baluchistan by making Balochs minority in Baluchistan, just like United Kingdom colonised Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and USA, by settling people in these areas from UK making locals a minority (people migrating to these areas from UK were also called settlers).

For many Balochs, Pakistan is Punjab and Pakistani establishment is Punjabi establishment. Balochs also think that settlers are agents of establishment, whom establishment supports and protects in Baluchistan, that make settlers a valid target.

If you will see trend of killing Punjabis in Baluchistan, reality is that, they were not ordinary Punjabis but they were mostly Punjabi settlers who were government servants working in Baluchistan. Recently, Balochs have started targeting Punjabi civilian settlers too on pretext that establishment is killing innocent Balochs, so they have right to kill innocent settlers.

What I am writing in my post is that, for Pakistan to keep Baluchistan within federation, Pakistan has to do something to stop trend of inter-provincial migration, and also convince Balochs that it is not Pakistani intention to colonise Baluchistan by sending settlers. Else, the way things are going, Baluchistan could leave federation just like Bangladesh.

Balochs may not be able to do that on their own but since Pakistan is good in making every neighbouring country enemy, and many world influential powers may also like to see Pakistan disintegrate, Balochs would always going to find financial and military help from outside in support of their struggle for independence.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

What kind of a logic it is? Even if they get independence, will nobody from outside world come to Balochistan? The UAE was developed and is still managed mostly by foreigners. If they would have not let anyone come to their country fearing that they might be conolozied, the UAE might still have been a huge desert.

There might be some people in Balochistan who fear that if Balochistan progresses and ordinary people get educated, they will lose reins of their own people.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

^^^
UAE do not give nationality to anyone moving there for work, neither preference is given to people going to UAE for work over locals. No non-UAE resident have right to move to UAE without visa, live there, and take up local residency. UAE also do not have situation where security forces, army, police, paramilitary forces, etc ... who are mostly consisting of people from outside UAE, killing and dumping UAE local residents.

Situation of Baluchistan is different. As confederating state within Pakistan, anyone can literally go to Baluchistan and stay there for years then take domicile legally to become permanent resident of Baluchistan. Worse is that, many are moving to Baluchistan and making fake domicile (with the help of establishment) to stay in Baluchistan and exploit that domicile. Purpose of most these settlers are not to serve Baluchistan but to use Baluchistan domicile to get government jobs or admission in professional colleges, depriving locals. These settlers also get support from establishment who themselves are mostly from outside Baluchistan.

All this wrongs over the years have brought up situation where now it seems many Balochs are showing desire to breakup from confederation.

In my opinion, if Pakistan is interested to keep Baluchistan within federation, than their grievances have to get sorted out, else inevitable is bound to happen.

I think that if Baluchistan was left to govern themselves from beginning, resources of Baluchistan would have been under the control of Balochs, inter-provincial migration was kept minimal, government jobs were mostly held by balochs, etc ... then Baluchistan would have been a strong supporter of confederation and situation of Baluchistan would have been much different then what it is today.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Please read and think why Balochs are targeting Punjabi settlers who are mostly government employees (working in education, administration, police, or whatever)?

Government jobs need domicile and provincial government jobs should be given to locals. Unfortunately, due to fake domicile, nepotism and preferences of establishment in Baluchistan, instead of Balochs there are many settlers (mostly Punjabis) in government jobs. Many Balochs are unemployed when these jobs should have been theirs. Worse is that, whenever they raise voices against this injustice, establishment response was to persecute them with torture, killing, disapearncce or prison. Seeing all this, many Balochs have started feeling as colonised people, and thus are now fighting for independence. Situation is becoming from bad to worse.

We should realise that Balochs are not killing anyone but their main targets are Punjabi government officials (be they in education, or wherever) whom Balochs consider as spies. In my opinion, once inter-provincial migration, nepotism, discrimination, etc would stop and Balochs would find that they are mostly employed and are running all the departments of province, resources of Baluchistan is theirs, they are incharge of their lives and well being, and that they have no fear being part of federation, things would change.

In defence of Punjabis: Stop target killing of Punjabi settlers in Balochistan « Therearenosunglasses’s Weblog

Baloch nationalist parties not interested in APC
By Malik Siraj Akbar
*
The activities of Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), a key player in Balochistan trouble, have increased since the induction of the new government. The BLA has rejected the offer for negotiations. Asked how it viewed the proposed APC, a BLA spokesman told Daily Times it was “a sheer waste of time”. The BLA claims responsibility of the killing of a Punjabi professor last week
* saying he was a spy** for intelligence agencies. The BLA has killed dozens of government personnel in Balochistan citing the same reason. Most of those killed are Punjabis. [Shows, target are Punjabis in government jobs … as school teachers and university professors are also government servants].

Balochistan situation getting bleaker by the day
MALIK SIRAJ AKBAR

Killing of Baloch leaders (by Pakistan Army has) led to an intensified campaign of target killing by Baloch insurgents against Punjabi settlers in the province, mainly of school teachers and government servants. Baloch militants warned that no school across Balochistan should hoist the Pakistani flag or play the national anthem. The threat was taken seriously only after half of a dozen Punjabi principals and teachers were murdered in broad daylight.

Baloch activists burned Pakistani flags and hoisted the flag of an independent Balochistan on major educational institutions, including at the University of Balochistan. The underground Baloch groups have threatened to kill anyone who removes these Baloch flags or resumes singing the Pakistani anthem at schools. Now even elite grammar schools in Quetta have stopped playing Pakistan’s anthem.

All this has engendered an atmosphere of fear. The Balochistan Residential College in Khuzdar district, for instance, has been shut for more than two months since the killing of its principal. When the issue was raised at Balochistan Assembly, the Education Minister expressed “utter helplessness.”

“Now that the killings have already started, we can not simply describe it as a ‘threat’ only. It is a reality that our teachers are facing and being killed. The government should take notice of this dire situation before the teachers give up their jobs because of fear,” was his only response.

A considerable number of teachers in Balochistan are Punjabis, and most of them have applied with the Education Department for their transfer outside Balochistan for security reasons. The Education Ministry says the number of such applications is too high to be entertained.

Punjabi officials in other government departments are equally reluctant to stay on in the province fearing they could become targets. According to Daily Aaj Kal, 10 government officials from Punjab agreed to serve in Balochistan only after they were offered double salaries, a four-month leave per year and promotions to the next grade.

According to poster (from friends korner): On the backing of Chief Minister Balochistan Aslam Raisani and baloch nationalist leaders including Bramdagh Bugti and Akhtar Mengal, Baloch terrorists kill yet another Punjabi professor in Quetta. This is the third such incident in the last 7 days. First, the Punjabi provincial education minister was shot dead 7 days ago, then the Punjabi secretary of education was shot dead 3 days ago and now another Punjabi professor has been killed in the open with the baloch leaders and baloch provincial government enjoying the massacre.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

In my opinion, one of the biggest problems creating discord in Pakistan is inter-provincial migration. Pakistan is one country, so let it be one country. Do not exploit any community within Pakistan for personal gain. Let live and let others live peacefully within federation.

My question for those supporting inter-provincial migration (in large numbers, not due to exceptional circumstances) is that why? Are these people living in non-Muslim countries where their lives and religion is in danger? Obviously not, so why migrate?

If purpose is economical well-being (jobs and opportunities), then people (and government) should realise that where they are going to move, people there are also looking for same (jobs and opportunities), and that jobs and opportunities all over Pakistan is scarce. Everywhere, many are unemployed including graduates. So these economical migrants won’t be invited, rather they would create discord and division wherever they would migrate within Pakistan.

So, they should try to get economical well-being (jobs and opportunities) they are looking for in the province (rather area) they are living. If they could not get what they want in areas they are living, they should hang the representatives whom they voted and vote someone competent and hard working into power, who could provide them with jobs and opportunities.

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

[quote]
In my opinion, one of the biggest problems creating discord in Pakistan is inter-provincial migration. Pakistan is one country, so let it be one country. Do not exploit any community within Pakistan for personal gain. Let live and let others live peacefully within federation.
[/quote]

So, you basically want to extend the concept of ilaaq-e-ghair to all of Pakistan? Now, I am against quota systems where people are pumped into places just because they are so and so ethnicity, but what you are suggesting will stagnate Pakistan. Isn't there a saying in Urdu to the effect of that the more the money is moved around, the higher the returns on that money. I think it basically is telling you that you have to use money (trade, people move around set up businesses on their own) in order to make more money (in turn build up the country).

Re: Balochistan crisis & its resolution!

Balochistan crisis: In passionate speech, Shahbaz urges soul-searching instead of condemning US bill – The Express Tribune