Balochistan after Bugti

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

This is where the whole Balochistan issue began. A lady doctor called Shazia Khalid (from Lahore) was brutally sexually assaulted by an army man. Bugti tribe wanted him to be punished but Musharraf protected him at the expense of the state. The guy (Musharraf) who supports killing Bugti (extra judicially) could have saved Pakistan if instead of his ego he had allowed trial of the army man who is alleged to have assaulted the woman.

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/31/opinion/31kristof.html?_r=1

Musharraf

**Musharraf’s Rape Cover-Up
**By Akbar Ahmed | Thursday, June 14, 2007

In 2005, 32-year-old Shazia Khalid, a doctor in Pakistan, was allegedly raped by an officer in the Pakistani army. As Akbar Ahmed writes in “Journey into Islam,” the resulting uproar, involving notions of tribal loyalty on the one side — and U.S.-supplied weapons and Pakistan’s military might on the other — reflects the tension between Islam and globalization.

While the Mukhtaran story was making international headlines, another story of rape involving tribes, notions of tribal hospitality and honor and the clash with modern systems was developing around thirty-two-year-old Shazia Khalid.

On the face of it, Shazia seemed not at all like Mukhtaran.

Shazia’s rape

She was an educated woman with a medical degree who wished to serve in the more remote parts of Pakistan where doctors are few and far between, particularly female doctors. She had been posted to the headquarters of the Pakistan Petroleum Plant in Sui in Baluchistan, the heartland of the famous Bugti tribe.

In the middle of the night on January 2, 2005, Shazia awakened to a nightmare. A man was attempting to strangle her: “He started pressing on my throat so I couldn’t breathe. He tied the telephone cord around my throat. He beat me on the head with the telephone receiver. Then he took my prayer scarf and he blindfolded me with it and he took the telephone cord and he tied my wrists and he laid me down on the bed. I tried hard to fight, but he raped me.”

Throughout the night, the man casually watched television between bouts of assaulting her and boasting about his powerful connections in the army.
**
Sent to a psychiatric hospital

The next morning, Shazia staggered to the nurses’ quarters. Officials from the Pakistan Petroleum Plant rushed across when they heard about the incident.
**
They warned her not to talk about the matter with anyone, for it would not only ruin her reputation but she could be arrested and tried under Pakistan’s notorious adultery laws — which are heavily weighted against the female. She was quickly drugged and in a stupor removed to a psychiatric hospital in Karachi.

A Mukhtaran connection

**When Shazia Khalid’s story began to filter outside official circles, Musharraf’s challenge was to prevent it from connecting up with Mukhtaran’s story, which had already become international news. Musharraf’s officials put Shazia and her husband under house arrest for two months.
**
**A campaign was launched to smear her character, with rumors of her being a loose woman and perhaps even a prostitute. To make matters worse, her husband’s father gathered a mob threatening to kill her because she had dishonored the family name.
**
**Desperate and dejected, Shazia tried to commit suicide.
**
**Refuge in London
**
**Finding Shazia’s story beginning to leak to the press, the government encouraged her to leave the country, threatening that she and her husband would disappear and no one would even find their bodies if she spoke up.
**
Shazia and her husband flew to London, unable to bring their son, whom the authorities held back as insurance. She found a one-room flat in a poor neighborhood in London and applied for asylum in Canada, where she has relatives and friends.

**The nightmare continues
**
Canada turned down her request for a visa. Shazia’s nightmare has still not ended: “I stay awake at night, thinking, ‘Why me?’

When Shazia Khalid’s story began to filter outside official circles, Musharraf’s challenge was to prevent it from connecting up with Mukhtaran’s story.

**My career is ruined. My husband’s career is ruined. I cannot see my son. If I had died then, it would have been better.”

While Shazia remained in a state of limbo, contemplating the ruins of her life, men of honor back in Baluchistan were taking up her cause. Although she herself was not from the province, the elders of the Bugti tribe dominating the Sui region of Baluchistan believed that she had been their special guest and had intended to serve Bugti women.**

**They were therefore obliged to protect her under their idea of honor and hospitality, reminiscent of the chivalrous and gentlemanly behavior in the romantic days of yore depicted in Western literature and history books.
**
**Bugti tribe vs. Pakistan
**
**The elders of the Bugti tribe pressed for justice in Shazia’s case, demanding that the rapist be punished according to tribal law. Because the alleged criminal belonged to the Pakistan army — and was rumored to have connections at the highest levels, as he had boasted to Shazia — important officials helped to stall the case.
**
An important detail in the background to this incident was a long-standing dispute between the Bugti demanding a bigger share of the oil and gas revenues produced from their land and the government of Pakistan.

**A demand for justice
**
They warned Shazia not to talk about the matter with anyone, for it would not only ruin her reputation — but she could be arrested and tried under Pakistan’s notorious adultery laws, which are heavily weighted against the female.

**Thus, when the Bugti began agitating for justice, local authorities deliberately misrepresented their demands as an excuse to challenge the government.
With negotiations between the local authorities and the Bugti faltering, the head of the tribe, Nawab Akbar Bugti, decided to take matters into his own hands.
**
The nawab demanded that justice be done and that the rapist who had dishonored the tradition of the tribe be punished. The government took strong action to contain the nawab’s intervention by “capturing his house and issuing warrants for his arrest. The nawab then fled to the remote hills to escape arrest.

**Attack and retaliation
**
As Pakistani authorities attacked the Bugti, President Musharraf promised that the tribesmen would “not know what hit them.” He planned to unleash on them the latest weapons he had acquired from the United States for the war on terror.

In retaliation, the Bugti attacked trains, railway lines, and cantonments. But Musharraf kept his promise. The Bugti did not know what hit them when their nawab was killed along with members of his family and tribe in an army strike in August 2006. U.S.-supplied F-16 fighter planes and helicopter gunships, raining down cluster bombs, phosphorous and other chemicals, had found the nawab through an intercepted satellite phone call.

**Further violence
**
A man was attempting to strangle Shazia: “He took my prayer scarf and he blindfolded me with it and he took the telephone cord and he tied my wrists and he laid me down on the bed. I tried hard to fight, but he raped me.”

In the end, the technology of globalization had caught up with the man who, in his behavior, values and appearance, represented the pride and identity of the tribe more than anyone else: the man once called the Tiger of Baluchistan.

In the ensuing protests, riots and inflammatory speeches, Baluch leaders were quick to connect the use of U.S. weapons with their plight: “All those weapons and aid that the U.S. has given to Pakistan to fight Al Qaeda and the Taliban, the Pakistan army is using against the nationalists in Baluchistan,” complained Mengal, a member of the Baluchistan provincial assembly.

**Further violence was assured as tribesmen prepared to intensify their quest for revenge. The scale of the reaction baffled Pakistan’s military rulers.
**
Editor’s Note: This feature is adapted from JOURNEY INTO ISLAM: THE CRISIS OF CIVILIZATION by Akbar Ahmed, copyright 2007. Published with permission of Brookings Institution Press.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

When bugati was killed my uncle said...US gave weapons to fight Al-qaida and musharraf used them against bugti...

It was shock for me as i had seen nawab akbar bugti in news meeting with pakistani leaders,minister..and he was killed in air strike by his own govt...

I think he deserved a trial in court of law....

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

The war began from the mishandling of Dr Shazia’s case (and Musharraf’s bloated ego) and then Bugti was forced to go to the mountains, which means defiance in their culture.

Anyways…

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

CBC News In Depth: Pakistan

Land, Gold and Women
Part 2: The case of Shazia KhalidLast Updated Feb. 28, 2006CBC News
From The National February 28 and March 1, 2006
Correspondent: Terence McKenna
Producer: Michelle Gagnon
Consulting Producer: Nazim Baksh

Perhaps the most serious recent rape case in Pakistan is that of Shazia Khalid, a 32-year old medical doctor from Karachi. After graduating from medical school, Shazia married her husband, Khalid, an engineer who works in the oil industry.

Shazia was offered a job by the government-run Pakistan Petroleum Limited at a large gas facility in Sui, a remote town in the province of Baluchistan.

**She began working in the hospital in Sui, while her husband, Khalid Khwaja was working in Libya.

**
**Shazia was living in a supposedly secure housing complex inside the Sui Gas facility. Security was provided by a branch on the Pakistan Military called the DSG, the Defence Security Guards.
**

In January 2005, Shazia was alone, sleeping in her apartment, when she was attacked.

“I tried using all my stamina to protect myself and save myself. He used my scarf to blindfold me and he tied up my wrists with the telephone wire. I was helpless, I was completely helpless. Then, he raped me,” says Shazia. “The room was completely dark, I couldn’t see anything, I couldn’t understand what was going on. I tried to move, he would hit me whenever I tried to move. He said, ‘I have a pistol, if you scream, if you try and call someone for help, I will kill you.’”

“What was I suppose to do? I was helpless. He said I am not just any common person. Don’t do anything, you stay quiet, you don’t say anything to anybody. And he raped me again.”

Shazia Khalid’s ordeal went on all night. At sunrise, after she was bound and gagged, her attacker departed.
Cover-upShazia was able to free herself and get to the hospital at the Pakistan Petroleum Facility. That’s when the cover-up began. **She was told by company officials to remain silent.

**
**“They said there is no need to tell anybody anything. If you do, it’s your reputation that you will lose. If you report it to the police, then they’ll push you around. You’ll have to go to court, and you won’t achieve anything. So keep quiet. I was alone. I didn’t know what to do.”
**

Shazia phoned her husband in Libya. He came home immediately.

“I found Shazia running a high temperature, bruises on her legs, her hands were swollen, her nose was swollen, her ears were bruised, very bad situation,” says Khalid.
He says Shazia couldn’t face him. “I said it’s not your fault. Why are you feeling guilty? It’s not your fault.”

**The Pakistan Defence Security Guards, the DSG, took control of the scene of the crime. They would not allow the police to investigate. Other staff members at the Sui gas facility became concerned about a military cover-up. They informed local politicians that the chief suspect in the rape was a member of the Pakistan Military.
**
Shahid Bugti of the opposition Jahoori Wattan Party was told the rapist’s name was Captain Hamad.

**“Now, he being a captain in the DSG guard, it was part of his duty to take care of the installations as well as all the people living inside the fenced area,” Bugti says. “But this was very unfortunate that the person who was supposed to protect the people living in the inside area, happened to be the rapist.”
**

**In the middle of the investigation, there was a very unusual development. General Musharraf, the President of Pakistan, announced that the chief suspect, Captain Hamad, was 100 per cent innocent.
**
**“If the President of the country comes out on television without the investigation being carried out and says that the accused he can assure people is innocent. I believe as a citizen he has no right to say it and if he does, then he is involved in a cover-up,” Asma Jahangir says.
**

**Shahid Bugti says that once the dictator had spoken, there would be no further investigation of the accused rapist.
**

**“Who would come up with evidence against Hamad and say, ‘Yes, Hamad is guilty whereas General Musharraf has given him a clean sheet.’ So it’s unthinkable over here,” Bugti says.
**

The province of Baluchistan, where the Shazia Khalid rape took place, is a fiercely independent tribal society. Many local tribes have their own system of justice and their own honour code. There is also widespread resentment of the Pakistan army here. So when it appeared that the military was covering up the rape of a young doctor by an army captain, the Bugti clan took the law into their own hands. They went off to attack the military contingent at the Sui Gas facility.

“Yes they did fire rockets, they did fire guns, they showed their resentment in the strongest possible way. This is part of their culture,” Sahid Bugti says. “They were trying to attack the DSG people who had committed this rape, who were supporting Captain Hamad, and Captain Hamad was in their protection.”

After the attack on the Sui Gas Facility, Pakistani military officials held a press briefing, which portrayed the damage as the result of an unprovoked attack from the Bugti tribesmen.
Attacking the victim**The story of Shazia Khalid’s rape was becoming an embarrassment to members of the Musharraf regime, and so they developed a new strategy. They began attacking the victim.
**

**Stories began appearing in the newspapers claiming that Dr Shazia Khalid was a loose woman, that she wore suggestive clothes and had many male friends. It was even suggested that she was a prostitute.
**

“What was very disgusting was that they tried to tarnish her character. So the victim of rape has to take that risk as well apart from the other risk that her character is going to be tarnished all the time and the president himself said to one of the editors of the newspaper that if he were to speak of Dr. Shazia, he didn’t want to but he could say a few things too. I mean what kind of an insinuation is that?” Jahangir says.

Shazia was staying in Karachi with her husband Khalid and her adopted son Adnan when the stories appeared suggesting she was engaged in prostitution.

“I went to the washroom and filled the tub with water. I wanted to commit suicide. Khalid and my son started knocking on the door to find out why I was taking so long. I didn’t answer,” she says. “Then Adnan knocked really hard and he said, ‘Mom if you kill yourself then I will kill myself. Please open the door.’ I opened the door.”

Every year, hundreds of Pakistani women who have been raped commit suicide.

The Pakistani government’s next move was to get rid of Dr Shazia Khalid. She says she was ordered to leave the country for her own safety.

“Safety from whom?” Jahangir asks. “What safety were they concerned about for Dr. Shazia. Safety from whom? From the Bugtis? But they were on her side. From the military? Well then, this is a strange one, that victims should be whisked out of their country because their safety is in danger and the perpetrators are protected by the government.”

The couple were asked where they would like to go. Because they have relatives in Toronto, they chose Canada.

“My family is there,” Shazia says, “My friends are there. We wanted to go somewhere where we had moral support, that’s why we chose Canada. We are highly qualified people, we didn’t want to leave Pakistan.”

Shazia and Khalid were told it would be faster to go to London, England, and that, from there, the Pakistani government would help them reach Canada. But once in London, they were abandoned by their government. Now they are in a legal limbo. They cannot be accepted to Canada as refugees because they are in a safe country, the U.K. They are living on welfare in London and waiting to be admitted to Canada as regular immigrants, which could take a long time.

Back in Pakistan, the government has a new version of events concerning the rape.

**According to the Governor of Baluchistan, Owais Ahmed Ghani, there was no rape.


“There was violence, there was no rape,” says Ghani. “We will be placing some evidence for the world, because the world keeps on criticizing us, and Pakistan and the government about this.”

**
Last September, Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf came to visit the United States on a charm offensive. He wanted to portray himself as a progressive enlightened leader, a voice for moderation in the Muslim World.
President quoted**In an interview with the Washington Post, however, when he was asked about the rape issue, he was quoted as saying, “This has become a money making concern. A lot of people say if you want to go abroad and get a visa for Canada or citizenship and be a millionaire, get yourself raped.”
**

Pakistani women immediately hit the streets to protest Musharraf’s remarks.

“Well it was very sad when President Musharraf said that. We all reacted very strongly in Pakistan. I think he made a joker out of himself, which he truly is. If that is the impression that he has of the women in Pakistan, which are 50 per cent of the citizens of that country, you can easily see how much respect he has for his own citizens,” Jahangir says.

President Musharraf went into immediate damage control. Before a women’s group in New York, he denied having made the comments to the Washington Post. “Let me say with total sincerity that I never said that, and it has been misquoted. I happened to be where this was being quoted but these are not my words, and I would go to the extent of saying that I am not so silly and stupid to make comments of this sort.”

Unfortunately for the president, the Washington Post recorded his remarks and posted the recording on their website.

**General Musharraf’s remarks clearly referred to the case of Shazia Khalid, but she does not wish to debate him. **She just wants to get her family into Canada, and begin a new life. She does want to find some way of helping Pakistani women who have undergone experiences similar to her own.

“I didn’t get justice and I’ll regret that for the rest of my life. But I want to be a voice for women who’ve been through similar situations. I think that if I help these women, then I’ll get justice. Then, when they’ll be happy, I will be happy. I will think of them, I will think of them as a reward for me, as a victory for me. Even if one woman gets justice through my voice, I will have won,” she says.

The case of Mukhtar Mai is still working its way through the Pakistani courts but most observers believe she will win and her rapists will be punished.

“I believe that Mukhtar Mai may find justice at the end of her case because it has been picked up by the media, by people within the country that are very much looking forward to seeing that this case does receive some kind of justice. But it doesn’t change the legal system unfortunately. I am happy for Mukhtar Mai, but I don’t think that it changes the legal system for the rest of the victims.” Jahangir says.

Mukhtar Mai has already received a financial compensation package from the Pakistani government which she is putting to good use.

She believes that illiteracy and the lack of formal education is the key to the subjugation of women in Pakistan. Young girls are much less likely to be sent to school by their parents and there are almost twice as many illiterate women as men.

And so, with the help of a grant from the Canadian International Development Agency, Mukhtar Mai has opened a school for girls.

Every morning school begins with a religious song.

In class they are studying to read and write and learning English.

Women like Mukhtar Mai and Shazia Khalid see this as the best hope for Pakistan. They are determined that the lives of these young girls will be much better than their own and that their country can open a new chapter after so many years of women’s oppression.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

A brief timeline of the events that led to the operation in Balochistan which is continuing (after more than 7 years).

  1. After taking power, Musharraf set up cantonments in the province (in Dera Bugti and Kohlu) which was not accepted by the people of the province but he went ahead (typical mentality of a power hungry dictator) . SUI cantonment has now been converted into a military college (decision reversed in Jan 2011 but after a lot of damage).

  2. Zafarullah Jamali (June 2004) was removed, I believe this was the precursor to starting operations in Dera Bugti and Marri areas

  3. Mishandling of Dr Shazia’s case in Jan 2005 which led to the attack by Bugti tribesmen on PPL’s installations

  4. In 2005, Akbar Bugti and Balaach Marri presented 15 points for resolution of Balochistan issue which included halting construction of cantonments, greater control over their resources and protection of minorities

  5. March 2005, Military attacked Dera bugti in which 77 people were killed and Akbar Bugti fled to the mountains

  6. May 2005, Parliamentary Committee for Balochistan (under Ch Shujaat) presented a proposal for resolving the issue which was not implemented

  7. December 2005, Musharraf was attacked and after that a full fledge operation was launched in Dera Bugti and Kohlu

  8. August 2006, Bugti was killed and a new chapter of the war began

The conflict which affected 7 % of Baloch areas in 2005, has now spread to around 50 % after 7 years of warfare and now the solution to it has also become very complex.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti


and very soon we will have another 'operation' in different part of the country (though for different reasons), I wonder what is going to happen in 5-10 years from now?

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

Actually you would have point if he was arrested and Mushy went up him with hand gun and shot him in the head, but that is not what happened. When rebellion warlord is shooting at profession army, or even police for that matter, putting him trial isn't easy. To put someone on trial you must arrest them 1st and follow systematic legal procedures from there. So he was more like gangster who got killed in a police encounter. End of the story.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

Operations are not the answer to everything, but who can explain that to dictators.

This quoted paragraph is from 2004.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

1) Let not justify what these warlord have been doing (out all the Bloch tribes Bugtis and Maris are the problem).
2) Solution to old problem must not end with status quo.
3) Pakistani army or any citizen should be able to live and build in part of the country. There should be zero no go ares.
4) Any solution must must empower Bloch people and dis-empower Bloch sardars.
5) Bloch resources should spent on Bloch, all Blochs, equally and not on maintaining luxurious life styles of people like Bugti.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

[QUOTE]
1) Let not justify what these warlord have been doing (out all the Bloch tribes Bugtis and Maris are the problem).
[/QUOTE]

If thats the case the issue should have been confined in Bugti and Marri areas (Kohlu and Dera Bugti), but the ground situation is that in addition to the areas mentioned the situation in Jaffarabad, Nasirabad, Khuzdar, Turbat, Makran, Quetta etc is also not normal. In some of these areas there is no tribal influence.

[QUOTE]
2) Solution to old problem must not end with status quo.
[/QUOTE]

Agreed, but Musharraf's policies have provided just that. Replacement of Bugti's with Kalpars, and abductors and owners of private armies are sitting in Balochistan provincial government.

[QUOTE]
3) Pakistani army or any citizen should be able to live and build in part of the country. There should be zero no go ares.
[/QUOTE]

I agree but if the locals have some reservations its better to negotiate with them, otherwise it can be perceived as a means to subjugate the populace. The same has been the fate of Sui cantonment, the army got nothing in the end but aggravated the province's situation.

[QUOTE]
4) Any solution must must empower Bloch people and dis-empower Bloch sardars.
[/QUOTE]

That has not happened during the past 7 years. The government should have involved the Baloch, given them more resources and some autonomy. The way Musharraf tried to thrust projects on Baloch caused mistrust amongst the population, the result is that Gwadar port has been completed since 2008 but is still un-operational.

[QUOTE]
5) Bloch resources should spent on Bloch, all Blochs, equally and not on maintaining luxurious life styles of people like Bugti.
[/QUOTE]

Baloch resources should be spent on Baloch agreed, but it suits the government to pay off tribal chieftains instead of the population.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

You are right but this is what you know .
This is a normal thing in cities but it is a matter of area and traditions .
This is common in Baluchistan .
Every one goes into hills when he is angry .
There was no war in Baluchistan .
Bugties were not in a war with forces .
There was a tussle between Akbar Bugti and the administration .
He left Dera and went into hills .
There is normally ‘Jirgah’ in this situation
But we send a ‘mezail’ to them
No problem
Now they are doing same
Nothing to be angry .
And now …
بلوچستان مسئلے کا حل اقوام متحدہ کی نگرانی میں ریفرنڈم کرایا جائے، جمیل بگٹی

                           August 29, 2012 | [dailyqudrat](http://www.dailyqudrat.com/author/dailyqudrat/)              

                         [RIGHT][http://www.dailyqudrat.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Jameel-bugti01.jpg](http://www.dailyqudrat.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Jameel-bugti01.jpg)کوئٹہ  (قدرت نیوز)نواب محمد اکبر خان بگٹی کے صاحبزادے نوابزادہ جمیل اکبر خان  بگٹی نے کہا کہ اسٹیبلشمنٹ بلوچستان مسئلے کا پرامن حل کبھی نہیں چاہے گی  اسٹیبلشمنٹ کے طرز فکر میں تبدیلی نہیں آئیکوئی راجہ معافی مانگے یا  مہاراجہ بلوچ ناراض نہیں بلکہ بیزار ہیں بلوچستان مسئلہ کا پرامن و جمہوری  حل یہ ہے کہ از سر نو حد بندی کرکے اقوام متحدہ کی نگرانی میں ریفرنڈم  کرایا جائے ان خیالات ا اظہار انہوں نے شہید نواب اکبر بگٹی کی چھٹی برسی  کے موقع پر بگٹی بولک میاں غنڈی میں میڈیا سے بات چیت کے دوران کیا انہوں  نے کہا کہ میرے والد نواب محمد اکبر خان بگٹی کی شہادت کو چھ سال کا عرصہ  گذر نے کے باوجودذمہ داروں کو انصاف کے کٹہرے تک لانے میں کوئی قابل ذکر  پیش رفت نہیں ہوئی ہم نے پہلے بھی کہا تھا کہ چھ سال مزید گذر جائیں گے مگر  قاتلوں کو گرفتار نہیں کیا جائے گا آمر حکمرانوں سے ڈیل کے تحت بر سر  اقتدار آنے والوں سے کوئی توقع نہیں جو جماعت برسر اقتدار آنے کے بعداپنی  قائد بے نظیر بھٹو کے قا تلوں کو انصاف کے کٹہرے میں نہیں لاسکی تو بلوچ یہ  کیونکر اعتبار کریں کہ موجودہ حکومت ان کے زخموں پر مرہم رکھے گی بلوچستان  سے متعلق اسٹیبلشمنٹ کی پالیسیاں آج بھی اپنے تسلسل کے ساتھ جاری ہیں ڈیرہ  بگٹی سمیت بلوچستان میں آپریشن جاری ہے آپریشن کی بندش کے دعوؤں میں اگر  کوئی صداقت ہے تو پھر میڈیا کو ڈیرہ بگٹی جانے کی اجازت دی جائے تاکہ وہاں  کی اصل صورتحال سامنے آسکے حقائق یہ ہیں ڈیرہ بگٹی سے آج بھی ظلم و تشدد کی  پالیسیوں کی وجہ سے نقل مکانی کا سلسلہ جاری ہے ہزاروں افراد اپنے علاقوں  سے نقل مکانی کرکے جاچکے ہیں اسٹیبلشمنٹ بلوچستان کا پر امن حل کبھی نہیں  چاہے گی پارلیمانی نظام سے بلوچ مسئلہ کا کوئی حل ممکن نہیں کیونکہ اس ملک  کا پارلیمانی نظام اگر ہوتا تو ستر کی دہائی میں عوامی لیگ کے مینڈیٹ کو  تسلیم کیا جاتا لیکن بنگالیوں کی اکثریت کو تسلیم کرنے کی بجائے انہیں باہر  نکال پھینک دیا گیا ڈرون حملوں اور نیٹو کے حوالے سے پاکستانی پارلیمنٹ  میں قرار داد منظور کی گئی لیکن پھر خود ہی اس کی دھجیاں اڑا دی جاتی ہیں  انہوں نے کہا کہ جو اس وقت حکومت میں ہیں ان کے بعد آنے والے مزید بدتر  ہونگے انہوں نے کمیٹی کی تشکیل اور معافیوں کو بے سود قرار دیتے ہوئے کہا  کہ کوئی راجہ معافی مانگے یا پھر مہاراجہ ہمیں اس سے کوئی سروکار نہیں نہ  ہی بلوچ نے کبھی یہ تقاضہ کیا ہے کہ اس سے معافی مانگی جائے بلوچ ناراض  نہیں اب بے زار آچکے ہیں ناراضی و بے زاری الگ الگ ہیں سمجھنے کی ضرورت ہے  بلوچ قوم کو حکمرانوں پر کسی قسم کا کوئی اعتبار نہیں ایک سوال کے جواب میں  انہوں نے پشتون اگر الگ صوبہ چاہتے ہیں یا خیبر پختونخوا کے ساتھ جانا  چاہتے ہیں ہمیں کوئی اعتراض نہیں البتہ ہم چاہتے ہیں کہ ماضی میں جو علاقے  بلوچوں کی مرضی و منشاء کے بغیر سندھ و پنجاب میں شامل کئے گئے ڈیرہ غازی  خان ،راجن پور ،جیکب آباد ،کشمور ،کندھ کوٹ کو واپس بلوچستان میں شامل کیا  جائے بلوچستان کی از سر نو حد بندی کی جائے اور اگر کوئی بلوچستان کے مسئلہ  کا پر امن حل چاہتا ہے تو جمہوری و پر امن حل یہ ہے کہ اقوام متحدہ کی  نگرانی میں ریفرنڈم کرایا جائے عوام جو بھی فیصلہ دیں اس کو قبول کیا جائے  انہوں نے سنگل پارٹی کی تشکیل نہ ہونے کو بدبختی تعبیر کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ  انا ،لالچ نادانی کی وجہ سے ہم تاحال متحد نہیں ہوسکے لیکن قومی یکجہتی  ہماری آج کی ضرورت ہے اگر کسی کو آنے والی نسل کا کوئی خیال ہے تو انہیں  ایک پلیٹ فارم پر متحدہونا ہوگاجو آج اسٹیبلشمنٹ کے ساتھ بیٹھ کر خود کو  محفوظ سمجھ رہے ہیں وہ غلط فہمی کا شکار ہیں بلوچ نسل کشی کی پالیسیوں پر  عمل پیرا اسٹیبلشمنٹ ایک ایک کرکے سب کو ماردے گی انہوں نے کہا کہ بلوچستان  اس وقت حالت جنگ میں ہے تاہم اس دوران کہیں سے بھی کسی بے گناہ کو اگر قتل  کیا جاتا ہے تو میں اس کی مذمت کرتا ہوں ۔

Read also
سینیٹ کی قائمہ کمیٹی کا نیوی کو گوادر میں اراضی خالی کرنیکی ہدایت](http://www.dailyqudrat.com/2012/08/29/سینیٹ-کی-قائمہ-کمیٹی-کا-نیوی-کو-گوادر-می/)

http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/s480x480/225155_410841812297977_1848303100_n.jpg
: Interview with Pakistani Brigadier Nadir Mir (R) ~ The Fire Within

[/RIGHT]

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

Quetta is like a valley of death, everyday people are dying,denial of human rights, bad goverance, the list goes on and on, media is not exaggerating, infact, awaam is still being kept in the dark, alot of things are still not being discussed openly in the media. My question still remains the same what did we gained from this operation? has the Balochistan situation improved? one thug gone, and now we have new thugs sitting in government. miseries of Baloch people continues. why did he act in haste, didnt, he think of the consequences? he should have caught him,brought him to court and allowed the court to decide his fate.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

it just goes over my head, why military operation has always been the only option for our establishment?

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

News today
[TABLE]

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

How whats happening in Quetta is any diff than what is happening in any where else in the country? Quetta isn't any more or less peaceful than rest of the country. There are targeted killings in Khi, terrorist attacks everywhere in the country. Is that also happening b/c of Bugti is death?

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

Gwadar should become a separate province. Sadly, this govt has no vision & I don't expect next govt to be any better.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

^ agreed, we can only get frustrated...but what difference will that make to the government...

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

I thought we are talking about Balochistan situation here. there are similarities, but the reasons behind the chaos is different, most of the killings in Karachi are politically motivated. What we see in Balochistan is that after Bugti death, militants have launched a full fledged war against the govt/army, which wasnt the case before 2005.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

current govt should have tried to win the heart and minds of Baloch by bringing in social/economic opportunities, there is lack of education and development strategies, no wonder why its the most underdeveloped province in Pakistan. last I heard govt said, balochistan next budget will be people-friendly, but we didnt see anything happening.

Re: Balochistan after Bugti

^ all the people discussing Balochistan's problems here are naive. This I gather from the fact that they think Balochistan = only Baloch people. WRONG. Balochistan's problems affect Balochs and Pushtuns and Punjabis and Hazaras. Personally I am against naming provinces on ethnicities as it gives those ethnicities reason to do badmashi.