Backing murderers: Dera Bugti today

The self righteous ones who jumped with glee at Bugtis death must be very rpoud of themselves and their new supporters:

[Dera Bugti post-Nawab](http://thepost.com.pk/Previuos.aspx?dtlid=71404&src=Gulmina Bilal&date=04/12/2006)

Gulmina Bilal

The story goes that the elder had some guests. He asked his son to go inside and ask for tea to be sent out for the guests. The son went inside and found his stepmother in the kitchen and told her to make tea. After half an hour, the father sent the son inside again wondering how long it was taking the women to make tea. The son and the stepmother had a hot exchange, the result of which the son shot dead the stepmother. An hour later, the father shot the first wife, i.e. the son’s mother. The reason given was that to avenge the death of my wife, I shot your mother. Now we are even and can continue to be father and son.

This is not some story of a B-grade movie. **This is the story of a man who is actively working with the government intelligence agencies in Dera Bugti following the death of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti. This gentleman eventually married a Phoolan Devi-type character who used to organise highway robberies in Southern Punjab. This gentleman, Khan Mohammad Kalpar, is one of three tribal elders who is being supported and cultivated by the intelligence agencies. Khan Mohammad Kalpar is the chief of the Kalpar clan who were brought back to Dera Bugti by the government itself, **as the cameras looked on. Even President General Pervez Musharraf on numerous occasions has declared that the Kalpars and their chief are essentially the victims and that is why they were rehabilitated. A victim who is wanted in a number of cases, but let’s not split hairs over that.

The other two chiefs that are being propped up by the agencies nowadays is the chief of the Masouri clan, Kadir Masouri, and the chief of the Rahejas, Amndan Bugti. Amndan Bugti is also a cousin of sorts of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti. The Kalpars are based in Sui, the Rahejas are based in Dera Bugti, and the Masouris are based at Bekar, which is near Dera Bugti.

The three musketeers on whom the intelligence agencies are spending taxpayers’ money to prop them up in Dera Bugti are all wanted men. As I have written previously, Nawab Bugti was first a darling of the establishment and then became a pariah. The stories of G. M. Syed, Nawab Bugti and even Nawaz Sharif are no different. With the death of the Nawab and the resultant tribal power vacuum in Dera Bugti, these three musketeers are being ‘empowered’ and flushed with funds to consolidate and broaden their power base.

Given this background, let’s understand what are the immediate problems occupying the boys right now in Dera Bugti.

Right now the battle that is being played out in Dera Bugti post-Nawab is the battle for the post of the District Nazim. Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti had installed a Nazim, Kazim Bugti, against whom a no-confidence motion has been approved by the District Assembly. So now the three tribes are in the running for the Nazim’s position, each declaring that by virtue of their power, the intelligence agents should ‘approve and support’ their respective clan’s nominee.** Why are they interested in the position of the District Nazim? It is certainly not for any deep conviction in devolution or local government, but because of the fact that as compensation for all that has occurred in Dera Bugti, the federal government has announced a relief and development package which is to be spent through the district government. In a nutshell, it is big money which the three elders – duly supported by the agencies – are after.**

This is the issue that Dera Bugti is faced with now. Each of the clans is demanding that they should be ‘rewarded’ by the government for their respective part in helping the government against Nawab Bugti. All three elders are proclaimed offenders, but all that is being conveniently pushed under the carpet. The intelligence agencies have asked them to decide among themselves who the Nazim should be. The elders decided on Anwar Bugti, who is the son of Wadera Sher Mohammad who was very close to the Nawab. It is said that Wadera Sher Mohammad was the only man allowed to go inside the Nawab’s room apart from his personal valet. This consensus candidate of the three musketeers caused trouble in paradise between them and the agencies. The agencies reportedly rejected the nomination and were very upset that they had nominated someone close to the Nawab. Consequently the nomination was withdrawn. Thus, it is back to square one as far as choosing a Nazim is concerned. Needless to say, electing the Nazim through simple fair voting did not occur to anyone as a serious option. The District Coordination Officer Mr Sarmad Lasi, perhaps the most photographed and interviewed government servant, is also flirting with the musketeers and the agencies. On paper he has been transferred out of Dera Bugti, but he has managed to stay put because there is big money rolling about in Dera Bugti.

Like the other day’s newspaper, Dera Bugti has receded from our minds. The place that grabbed headlines three moths back does not even make it to the most obscure of the inside pages. Rhetorical statements have been made, limelight stolen, resignations given and taken back…in short, other places and people grabbed the headlines and Dera Bugti is the last thing newspaper readers have on their minds. This suits the interests of certain sections quite well.

The government is entering into alliances and arrangements as described above with the result that not one, but three potential Nawab Akbar Khan Bugtis will be created and 40 years down the line will be bombed because they challenged ‘the writ of the state’. I fail to understand that when you enter into alliances with proclaimed offenders, why is there an expectation that they will not challenge the writ of the state?

Did I hear someone ask what about the people of Dera Bugti? Well what about them? Since when have they counted as important? If the people were considered important, then would an election of the District Nazim be as problematic as it is now? If the people were considered important, then would the intelligence agencies be having free use of the people’s money to dole out? The people of Dera Bugti, of WANA and indeed of Pakistan do not count at all.

The writer is an electoral reforms and gender mainstreaming consultant based in Islamabad

Re: Backing murderers: Dera Bugti today

The self righteous ones who jumped with glee at Bugtis death must be very rpoud of themselves and their new supporters:

Just because one may not be satisified with the current situation does not mean that eradicating Bugti was not a good thing.

Khan Mohammad Kalpar is the chief of the Kalpar clan who were brought back to Dera Bugti by the government itself, as the cameras looked on. Even President General Pervez Musharraf on numerous occasions has declared that the Kalpars and their chief are essentially the victims and that is why they were rehabilitated. A victim who is wanted in a number of cases, but let’s not split hairs over that.

Lets split hairs over the fact that his crime does not extend to others, so if Kalpars were kicked out, and need to be settled back in, that is a whole diff issue than whether this guy is wanted crminal (btw innocent until proven guilty applies to all or just benazir types?)

btw what sardar in that area as not had criminal cases against him, and what sardar is an outstanding individual who has not done anything illegal. so among a bunch of crooks, u pick the crook who you can use right now to meet your objectives ie. stabilise the area.

*The three musketeers on whom the intelligence agencies are spending taxpayers’ money to prop them up in Dera Bugti are all wanted men. *

sorry, pakistani people do not pay taxes, so I gues sonly people who do pay proper txes have a right to whine about it, not the criminals who make up excuses to not pay taxes.

*As I have written previously, Nawab Bugti was first a darling of the establishment and then became a pariah. *

Not 'the' establishment, but of 'various' establishments. by using the word 'the' establishment gulmina is commiting intelelctual dishonesty.

It is certainly not for any deep conviction in devolution or local government, but because of the fact that as compensation for all that has occurred in Dera Bugti, the federal government has announced a relief and development package which is to be spent through the district government. In a nutshell, it is big money which the three elders – duly supported by the agencies – are after.

Obviously, govt would want some control on the utilization of the funds that are being pumpd into the area. So instead of one crooked warlord who was anti govt, you work with other crooked warlords who are not anti govt. There are no perfect solutions in imperfect circumstances. I mean I would be all for it if all the sardars were just removed, and this sardar, vadera, chaudhry type of system can just end, but since we dont have an apetitie for it, govt has to do the best it can and go for the best option available considering all the factors. This may or may not be a right decision, I dont see other proposed solutions here, just bashing of the current solution.

*This is the issue that Dera Bugti is faced with now. Each of the clans is demanding that they should be ‘rewarded’ by the government for their respective part in helping the government against Nawab Bugti. *

wait, there were Baloch people that were not only against Bugti but helped govt to finish him off. whoa...do baloch ppl know that. what about the military vs baloch yip yap then :)

*Like the other day’s newspaper, Dera Bugti has receded from our minds. The place that grabbed headlines three moths back does not even make it to the most obscure of the inside pages. *

Months gulmina months, u know maheenay.
moths are those insects that mess up yer threads..

I mean if you consider yourself a journalist and what nots a little attention to detail would be good. If you had similar attention to detail in your research and analysis, then we have bigger issues :)

in short, other places and people grabbed the headlines and Dera Bugti is the last thing newspaper readers have on their minds. This suits the interests of certain sections quite well.

if people gave a damn they would be up in arms. But aside from the fact that a huge big majority did not give a damn about bugti eradication, and the diff mouth pieces who were yip yapping were doign so more because it gave them a point to beat against the govt, and not that they personally cared. As public got tired of the story and moved on, those political schemers shut up as well. very sincere eh?

*The government is entering into alliances and arrangements as described above with the result that not one, but three potential Nawab Akbar Khan Bugtis will be created and 40 years down the line will be bombed because they challenged ‘the writ of the state’. *

potentially... potentially
theory, assumption,

I fail to understand that when you enter into alliances with proclaimed offenders, why is there an expectation that they will not challenge the writ of the state?

you fail to understand many other things as well I suppose. But a criminal is not always a traitor. Take Seth Abid for example, arguably one of the biggest smugglers Pakistan has had, but pretty patriotic through and through.

*Did I hear someone ask what about the people of Dera Bugti? Well what about them? Since when have they counted as important? *

well, tryign to stabilise the area does indicate the the govt thinks that they are important enough.

*If the people were considered important, then would the intelligence agencies be having free use of the people’s money to dole out? *

yet again I go back to say that its not always 'people's money' and secondly, if they are trying to stabilise the region, then they are doing the work for the people of Pakistan, whether or not someone can see that.

The people of Dera Bugti, of WANA and indeed of Pakistan do not count at all.

boo hoo...
No one did crap to dera bugti until the fools started blowing up pipelines..
No one did crap to Wana until they started harboring terrorists, lying to the govt and putting the entire nation in a comprimising position

get real lady

Re: Backing murderers: Dera Bugti today

I’m sorry i thought the idea was to “liberate” the people?

Actually most people do pay taxes, they are called indirect taxes..and last i checked the constitution of pakistan doesn’t say ..you don’t pay income tax because of poverty and hence don’t deserve to complain/protest

the establishment is well understood by analysts to mean the military-bureaucratic elite and it’s proxies. It has a collective viewpoint that I am sure you will appreciate..

Obviously this government doesn’t have an appetite for removing feudalism it has it’s allies all the big feudals of Balochistan, Sindh and Punjab as well as the crony capitalists and tribal leaders of all regions. It is the biggest beneficiary of the feudal mentality..why should it oppose it? The stuff about best options and best it can..or not an ideal situation that are bandied about are just excuses for a system which ultimately perpetuates the system it pretends to oppose.

I am not sure who you were referring to here..

Experience, history and common sense..after all I thought the government supporters were telling the world how they’d liberated the locals from a tyrant and warlord?

Interesting you should say that, so does that mean you think Benazir is a patriot? But i take your point .. by definition a traitor is someone who violates the constitution, sides with a foreign power for his own interests:clown:

Thats probably the most accurate statement about the governments actions I’ve heard so far..:halo:

Re: Backing murderers: Dera Bugti today

I’m sorry i thought the idea was to “liberate” the people?

No need to apologize for your misunderstanding :slight_smile:

**Actually most people do pay taxes, they are called indirect taxes..and last i checked the constitution of pakistan doesn’t say ..you don’t pay income tax because of poverty and hence don’t deserve to complain/protest **

If the writer of that article was going to being in tax payers, then well I am just pointing out that vast majority of people in pakistana re tax cheats. This is based on Govt reports on taxation of every single governmen over the last 2 decades.

the establishment is well understood by analysts to mean the military-bureaucratic elite and it’s proxies. It has a collective viewpoint that I am sure you will appreciate..

indeed, but her slant of the establishment especially as she is lookign at current situation is misleading, she should have been more specific i.e. whether she means diff govts over the years, or this govt. right now its very vague.

Obviously this government doesn’t have an appetite for removing feudalism it has it’s allies all the big feudals of Balochistan, Sindh and Punjab as well as the crony capitalists and tribal leaders of all regions. It is the biggest beneficiary of the feudal mentality..why should it oppose it? The stuff about best options and best it can..or not an ideal situation that are bandied about are just excuses for a system which ultimately perpetuates the system it pretends to oppose.

lets inject a little honesty here. its not just ‘this’ government, but every govt in recent history that has had fuedals in it, fuedals supporting it, and err fuedals..running it. As I said, I am in full support of the fuedals types as well as all these insiders banned…starting with the chief cheerleaders hiding out in London.
I agree govt has failed to ban the crooks from politics. I am however happpy to see that even with the same faces, the country has made remarkable progress, and that may be due to the quality of leadership.

**I am not sure who you were referring to here.. **

If the writer is goign to complain that people have basically fogotten about teh bugti eradication, well its people’s preference right, they forgot about it because they dont care about it for the most part.

BExperience, history and common sense..after all I thought the government supporters were telling the world how they’d liberated the locals from a tyrant and warlord?**

they did. which is a fact. Now they have to stabilise the region and

**Interesting you should say that, so does that mean you think Benazir is a patriot? **

cant comment on that, but I do know she is corrupt, swiss and british courts seem to agree with that as well.

**But i take your point .. by definition a traitor is someone who violates the constitution, **

does the constitution allow a leader to take kickbacks? like benazir did, or nawaz did. does the constitution allow someone who did not win majority to break the country apart for his political gains? …

**sides with a foreign power for his own interests:clown: **

yes, Pakistan has never sided with a foriegn power before for the nation’s interests. But yeah I suppose you would rather have had daisy cutters falling over Pakistan as well.