Axis of Evil

:salam2:
Axis of evil is a term initially used by the former United States President George W. Bush in his State of the Union Address on January 29, 2002, and often repeated throughout his presidency, describing governments that he accused of helping terrorism and seeking weapons of mass destruction. Bush labeled Iran, Iraq and North Korea as the axis of evil.

On May 6, 2002, then-Undersecretary of State John R. Bolton gave a speech entitled “Beyond the Axis of Evil”. In it he added three more nations to be grouped with the already mentioned rogue states: Libya, Syria, and Cuba. The criteria for inclusion in this grouping were: “state sponsors of terrorism that are pursuing or who have the potential to pursue weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or have the capability to do so in violation of their treaty obligations”. The speech was widely reported as an expansion of the original axis of evil.

He stated Iran “aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian people’s hope for freedom.” Of the three nations Bush cited, however, he gave the most criticism to Iraq.

He stated “Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror. The Iraqi regime has plotted to develop anthrax and nerve gas and nuclear weapons for over a decade. This is a regime that has already used poison gas to murder thousands of its own citizens, leaving the bodies of mothers huddled over their dead children. This is a regime that agreed to international inspections, then kicked out the inspectors. This is a regime that has something to hide from the civilized world.” Afterwards, Bush said, “States like these and their terrorist allies constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.”

Much of the information—primarily dealing with Iraq and its alleged weapons of mass destruction and terror ties—has been proven false by Senate-appointed committee investigations. Several prominent conspiracy theorists have also linked the fact that the countries named under the axis of evil were the only countries at that point without a Rothschild family run Central Bank.

In conclution many countries in Middle East became a secure place of living for Arab terrorist or in more acceptable/known word for ‘Muslims Terrorist’. The Anti Islamic media pushed so harder to bring the image of arab as haterd arab muslims, suicide attackers, enemies of western etc.,

If we see it in another way than we’ll came to know that the ‘zionist’ who owns the media and propogating anti islamic/anti arab false news trying to push to achieve the Promise land. Zion are are the apotheosis of the anti-christ and could have been conjured up only by theological minds imbued with the fearful expectation of the eventual coming of an anti Christ i.e., The Dajjal.

Re: Axis of Evil

Its interesting that out of the original Middle Eastern Axis countries Iraq, Iran, Syria and Libya only the Irani regime remains in a position of power. With things going the way they are a conflict seems certain with Iran too. Iran is allegedely building a nuclear weapon, the logic being that it can be used as a deterrent against hostile entities but I really don't think the US or Israel will allow that (especially when the republicans return to power) ironically it will cause the regimes destruction.
I'm not so sure if this is really an attack on Islam per say, we have to realise that Colonel Gaddaffi, Saddam Hussein, and Basher Assad had oppressed the Islamists themselves and kept them away from power. Although I do agree it has a lot to do with protecting Israel.

Its strange that the Islamic theocratic countries seem to be proxies of the US but the relatively secular countries are the ones who the West and Israel had the most to fear.

Re: Axis of Evil

Agree with you that Irani regime remains in a position of power but till how long there is no surety or that as the Anti Islamic either Zionist or those who are in support of Israel i.e., Zions, are trying to provoke a war against different sectors within the religion Islam. What happened in Bahrain, KSA, Syria and in other Middle East country is war against sectarianism. Somehow they successed in this but failed to successed in Arab Christian and Muslim who lives their since age with each others in peace & harmony.

What I mean they try to pick all that small and big issues where two person have different opinion so that they push it more and try to provoke fight among them so they can go for their evil plan.

In 1948 Israel occupied Palestine. UN, Peace-maker agencies and US failed to resolve it hence they'll talking for peace. Another interesting thing is that Syria wasn't fall under the law of Central bank owned by Ruthchilds like many other coutries i.e., Egypt, Jordan, KSA etc., signed the agreement with Israel/USA to be their bigger supportive and let see their fellow countrymen suffers.

I remember Iraq - Kuwait war that time and pplz were fear that Iraq attacked with WMD i.e. bio attack but nothing since that till happen or heard. Moreover what happened in past will remain a part of history and none will try to read or understand.

[QUOTE]

Its strange that the Islamic theocratic countries seem to be proxies of the US but the relatively secular countries are the ones who the West and Israel had the most to fear.
[/QUOTE]

You are right. Before the arab spring, most political analysts used to say the west can not afford to have/ encourage democracy in the middle east simply because the majority would vote for an islamic state ruled by sharia and by nature be anti- american or against their interests. In other words, the leaders can no longer be brought off..without a public outcry

The arab spring proved just that; tunisia to egypt, muslim brotherhood and pro palestinian leadership were all unexpected, and obama was quite reluctant to support the revolution until they were sure their pals time was up.

Saddam gaddafi were allies at one time too, it was when they went their own way that the west started to pretended they cared about the peoples rights.

Repressive but obliging states such as bahrain, saudi, qatar kuwait previously yemen, etc are given the red carpet treatment simply because they are willing ti 'obey' to serve the western interest, and have the power to keep their subjects at bay.

This is also what lead israel to claim saudi arabia as their last real ally in the mid east against iran. When the saudi prince bandar( new intelligence chief) stated that iran was more dangerous than israel, you know then that they are singing from the same hymn sheet.

At the moment the political world shifting gears into pro-iran and anti iran camp, whether by choice or by force.

Since 9/11, Iran was always the end target, be it when israel attacked lebanon in 2006 or syria being attacked now. And the main reason is israel's endless thirst for mid east dominance and further occupation, for which iran has simply got in the way. It has absolutely nothing, not even an iota to do with the rights of the people. After all, the west still dream of another shah.

Re: Axis of Evil

^
The west is only dreaming for one thing and that is NWO.

Axis of Evil

I dont know about NWO, but it wants to maintain its and israels dominance in the mideast, and iran is the only state in its way.

Re: Axis of Evil

New World Order conspiracy theory - Wikipedia NWO