Re: Aurangzeb - Bad ruler or Bad History
no ifs and buts just Jats. seems to be inspired from Aurangzeb 
Re: Aurangzeb - Bad ruler or Bad History
NO IFS NO BUTS JUST JATTS:D, This would also look good I believe, we did what marathas couldn’t do nor american are capable of doing now ie controlling Pashtoons:D, only people who dealt pashtoons most comprehensively, reason is that we are equally tribal, and are neighbours since time immemorial pactyans turned pashtoons and we turned Jats from scythians: that is the only difference we have:D, Inspiration comes from dominating the most invincible race of Pashtoons:D
Re: Aurangzeb - Bad ruler or Bad History
This is an interesting article on this subject: Aurangzeb and Islamic Rule in India | Lost Islamic History
We too have written an article on the relationship between Sikhism and the Mughal Emperor, Jahangir, in an article titled: The Origin of Sikh Militancy and Rebellion.
Re: Aurangzeb - Bad ruler or Bad History
Aurangazeb was a bad ruler. Only Akbar and Sher Shah Suri are the only 2 rulers worth learning about.
Re: Aurangzeb - Bad ruler or Bad History
Shivaji was one of the most remarkable rulers. He started out with just 2000 soldiers and created an army of 100000. He may have been hindu but he was a secular ruler for his times.
Re: Aurangzeb - Bad ruler or Bad History
Shivaji was one of the most remarkable rulers. He started out with just 2000 soldiers and created an army of 100000. He may have been hindu but he was a secular ruler for his times.
Interesting and his name is used by Shiva Sena.