Re: Attributes of Allah - The Belief Of True Salaf
Existence : It is obligatory to believe that Allah exists and that there is no doubt in His Existence.He exists without a place.Time does not lapse on Allah.
What is belief? Is it just acceptance of a concept to fulfill a void in our reasoning? Belief is like an axiom. By believing something you already state that it is not something provable or understandable but your taking it to fulfill some other purpose. So, the question i have is that why is believing in God such a big deal? How can it be claimed that there is no doubt..it is an axiom after all..and all axioms can be doubted..because they are assertions and not something deduced within a framework. Essentially, axioms are the basis of a framework and to doubt anything, you would have to doubt it within a framework of reasoning (since everything can be broken down into axioms). But the choice of the intial axioms is really not dependent on any framework. So why accept the God axiom?
You are saying God exists without a place and without time. Nothing also exists without space and time. You (or theology) are asserting *existance **onto something that does not exist in our understanding of the word. How can we even begin to use human language to explain God? To say God exists is really not an intelligible statement. Humans have a vague concept of what it means, but is it even saying *anything? The only reason we relate to that concept is because we have an intrinsice experience of existance (consciousness, awareness of space and time). But when you say that God is not similar to that experience (God resembles nothing in our universe..so that may even include consciousness in addition to space/time)..and yet exists..it totally defies the use of the word. Essentialy, no one in this world really knows what it means that God exists, since how are you supposed to use the noun God and attribute a word like "exists" to it when God is not within the framework of the universe.
- Oneness : Allah is One without any partners.He is One in His Self, His Attributes, and His Actions.
-
Again, it makes not much sense to say God is (insert limitation). God is by religions own definition not bounded, so to say God is one or multiple can be quite incoherent. Simply because it is claiming that God is a singular or multiple entity. But, we don't even know if God can be qualified as an "entity". Entity's are concepts of beings in this universe. Can we say God is a being? Once again, we get bogged down in our extending human literary metaphors to something that we have no idea of. Yes, to say God has no partners makes sense, because to say God has partners completely brings Him INTO our framework..and nullifies the conditions that make Him God*.
*Note: according to Islam that is; if the framework was one where God IS the framework..then that changes things because u can use the environment to describe God (something like hinduism, buddhism and certain forms of mysticism i suppose)
*
Eternity: Allah is Eternal; there is no beginning to His Existence.He has existed since before the creation. *
Now, attributes like this are extensions of human experiences. We have limited existance (or such is our belief) on earth and from there we make a hyperbole of "eternal". But really, God is not eternal, its just that by definition time is within the framework of reality, and God is not in reality, so time cannot be attributed to God. Hence, its not an attribute as a lack of an attribute. Which is what God would be: non-attributed (yes..im sure u can argue that that is an attribute in itself..but i think set theory takes care of that). I don't understand how you can attribute something to a God who "resembles nothing".
If the universe didn't exist, the above statement would not make much sense. Given the universe exists, it still doesn't make too much sense. For one, we don't KNOW God exists. We can only believe He does. Actually, I'm not sure knowledge even is a concrete subject, its more of a collection of belief's that have at their roots unprovable axioms.
- Everlastingness : Allah is Everlasting; His existence does not come to an end.He does not perish.
Well, yea, we cannot attribute human charactersitic to God..so why even existance to begin with? Once again, we only understand existance from a human perspective..what does it even mean when we apply it to God, who we believe to have no shape, form, change...ANYTHING. According to religion, he talks, thinks and acts....but...those are human metaphors...how can that be done if you don't change. To create the universe without changing anything! If only God existed before creation, and then creation popped up..that would be a change in the state of God. yup..all im saying is that I don't understand and its actually what makes me believe in God. Ahahaha. Yes, paradoxical no?
Non-neediness of others : Allah does not need any of His creations and they are all in need of Him. *
Right. This point is pretty interesting. I would think that something like this should be part of God's definition (i.e. its not God that we know, but we are using human language to produce a metaphor of God). however, if God does not need anything, it certainly brings up questions as to why he asks things of us. God would therefore not need us to believe in Him or do 'good'. I guess God doesn't need us to do all that..but its just what He's making us do. Ofcourse, this point also anthropomorphizes God. Now don't take offense..but try to think of the point I'm making without thinking I'm insulting God. What need does a particle have? Let's extend that to a rock. Now i'm not stating God is like either of these two material things, but that our conception of God from the get go assumes Him as a very isolated, abstract, unaffected entity. Yes, all creation doesn't need a rock or particle. But, someone COULD say that matter won't exist without a particle, hence its "needed" by everything to exist in the way it exists. However, i understand what it means to say that everything needs God, given that religion states He sustains everything and brought everything to BE..which is different from the particle's role.
But....again.."need" only occurs when something 'exists' to survive. Its a human word to describe what we require to survive. But that is if 'surviving' is our goal. If our goal was to die, then we would need nothing. Things that don't have life (or the will to sustain it) have no need. So, to ascribe this to God, doesn't make much sense, as we don't know what constitutes God. And to say we *need *God is only an extension of the **belief **that God created everything (i.e.we need what God created to survive..air, water, food, companionship...so the lowest common denominator is God). Its quite circular is all im saying
- Power : Allah has Power over everything. *
- Will : Everything that occurs in this world is by the Will of Allah.
I can't deny any of this. Its all belief. Its simply extensions of human experience.
Knowledge : Allah knows about all things before they occur. *
*Hearing : Allah hears all what is hearable, without an ear or any other organ. *
Sight : Allah sees all what is seeable, without a pupil or any other organ.* *
Life : Allah is alive without a soul, skin, or heart.His Life is not similar to ours.He is alive and does not die.
** Speech : Allah's Speech (Kalam) is without a tongue or lip.His Speech is not in a language, Arabic or anything else.His Speech does not resemble the speech of the humans. *
So now we're giving God human characteristics without the baggage of having to claim he is human! No brain, ears, tongue or eyes..but all the functionality of thinking, having emotions, hearing, seeing, talking (but all unlike humans somehow). And even LIFE (what is life...that we can attribute it to something that is like nothing?). Didn't someone say God is like nothing in this universe? Yet humans are made quite in His image...we share so many attributes..that just have physical counter parts. Isn't God very much like a human? Or is it that we have attributed humanity to an abstract entity which we cannot understand, simply so we can relate to it?
Do you not see that these are quite confusing and mind bending concepts for a creation with the feeble mind of a human? An entity exists that does not take up space or time, it never changes (but how can it if we don't know what it is)..and yet its able to know, see, hear and a plethora of other human abilities taken to the max. How can we be REQUIRED to believe this? What kind of a test is this? According to religion, God has given us this mind with reason and logic, and yet everything about God is contrary to this.
It makes more sense to THIS feeble human mind that God is experienced and simply cannot be communicated to others without severe loss of information. Which is where the use of metaphors comes in...but ppl take them literaly. But i simply do not get how some humans eternity lies in the balance based on them accepting such postulates about God. Its very easy to accept if you already believe (remember by framework and axiom rant in the beginning) but for someone who has not had a personal experience...to come to this stuff logically is really unimaginable.
*Non-resemblance to the creations : Allah does not resemble the creations.
*Hm..then why do we resemble God? Does God resemble us in some way, not others...or completely NOTHING about the universe has any relation to what God IS?
828