Attempted Revolution at Makkah 1979

[Das_Reich]

Re: Attempted Revolution at Makkah 1979

^ bro the whole point of posting it is that muslims shud not just pray at mosques and sit at home eating samoosas and drinking sharbat in ramazan and think they are doing a heck of a job at being muslims.

We have a obligation as a community to rise up reclaim our lands from those who abuse power.

second reason is that the label of khariji is used on anyone who use armed resistence , thats wrong khariji and the hadeeth relating to them refer to that group in 38-40 AH specifically and shud not be used as a general condemnation of all islamic opposition.

[Das_Reich]

@burqaposhx

Bro Das!

Do you know the meaning of "Haram" Sharif, or more specifically do you know what are all the "haraam" (forbidden) stuff in the Haram sharif?

Or perhaps you need to revisit the concept of "moral high ground".

Thank you.

they were not attacking but liberating

[burqaposhx]

@Das_Reich

they were not attacking but liberating

This is just sick!

[sa-Nafooz]

@PyariCgudia

Das Reich, you want us to feel sorry for a bunch of terrorists who couldn’t even leave Makkah alone in peace? Are you serious?

:k:

@burqaposhx

There was nothing “pious” or “revolutionary” about the attack on Haram sharif.

Saudi and Iranians too have to kick the dirty politicians / corrupt government officials out of the mosques.

Only then mosques will be protected from state’s abuse,
only then mosques will serve their real purpose aka spiritual enlightenment.

In holy month of fasting,

O Pakistani origin guppies!

for Allah’s sake, please stop adopting despicable ways of Saudis and Iranis.

We in Pakistan were much more tolerant and enlightened until the religious menace struck us in the form Saudi funded madrassahs and Iranian funded Imamia/Jafria movements.

May Allah save us from the religious intolerance so common in Saudi and Iran. Amin.

mashallah you’ve replied well…but u cud have included others as well yea…non-pakistanis or rather muslims in general

[COLD_FIRE]

the revolutionaries were not infallibales , but atleast they had the moral high ground.Cant believe u guys can so callously dimiss this hugh incident.

Das my brov :) If u have read a bit of history then it would have occurred to you that there have been more than a DOZEN other and bigger incidents in the Holy Ka'ba. This one's not even upto the mark.

[COLD_FIRE]

@Das_Reich

^ bro the whole point of posting it is that muslims shud not just pray at mosques and sit at home eating samoosas and drinking sharbat in ramazan and think they are doing a heck of a job at being muslims.

We have a obligation as a community to rise up reclaim our lands from those who abuse power.

second reason is that the label of khariji is used on anyone who use armed resistence , thats wrong khariji and the hadeeth relating to them refer to that group in 38-40 AH specifically and shud not be used as a general condemnation of all islamic opposition.

I agree with Psyah on this :)
And then, in any case, and in any given scenario... who in his right frame of mind would attack the civilians/hajis at the Hujj/Ka'ba just to make his point, liberation/Reformation/resistance... e.t.c... It's just too absurd to even think of.

If some one's got a grudge.. please go and bomb the parliament/president house/City Theater/e.t.c. Don't use grenades or TNT, use Ammonium nitrate... and e.t.c.

[burqaposhx]

@COlD_FIRE

...... And then, in any case, and in any given scenario... who in his right frame of mind would attack the civilians/hajis at the Hujj/Ka'ba just to make his point, liberation/Reformation/resistance... e.t.c... It's just too absurd to even think of. ...

Yeap.

Even Pagans and Kuffar knew the meaning of "Haram Sharif", that is, you do not commit military actions in and around Holy Kaba. No iffs or butts.

And here we have so called Muslims who are openly encouraging attacks on the Holy Kaba.

What a shame!