Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

I think this is a good first step.

Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy – The Express Tribune

Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

Maharaj Sunda, caretaker of Shri Krishna Bhagwan Mandir, shows a vandalised idol. PHOTO: EXPRESS

KARACHI:
In an extraordinary turn of events, Section 295-A was used to register a blasphemy case against Muslim men for damaging a Hindu temple during riots on Ishq-e-Rasool Day.

Section 295-A is the lesser known, non Islam-specific clause of the country’s notorious blasphemy law.

The Shri Krishna Bhagwan Mandir, located in the Gulshan-e-Maymar area of Karachi, was vandalised by a mob rallying against the anti-Islam film ‘Innocence of Muslims’. They also ransacked nearby houses where members of the Hindu community reside, and looted jewellery and other valuables.

For its part, the Gulshan-e-Maymar police registered a case using 295-A (‘deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs’) along with other charges of looting, vandalism and theft, against the protesters.

Nine people, including one Maulvi Habibur Rehman and his accomplices, men from nearby residential areas, have been nominated. SHO Jaffar Baloch said, “For me, every believer is the same. The desecration of a temple meant blasphemy to me, and that’s why we inserted that section.”

While no one has been arrested so far because the accused are on the run, security has been beefed up in the Hindu locality.

Scenes of chaos

In the single-room temple, destroyed sculptures of Hindu gods lay scattered. Too devastated to pick up the smashed pieces, its caretaker Maharaj Sunda cried, “I devoted my life to serve the gods, and seeing them like this makes me wish for death.” When the attack took place at 8:30 am, the Maharaj was tending to animals near the temple. Frightened screams from within the temple brought him running back.

When he entered the temple, a scene of chaos greeted him. Six statues of Hindu gods were destroyed. An infuriated mob of 150 people, carrying rocks and sticks, had barged in chanting ‘Allah hu Akbar’, and took away gold adornments from the four-foot statues before smashing them to the ground. Worth more than Rs1 Lakh each, the sculptures were brought from India when the temple was made in 2000.

“It was terrible. Everyone was running to save their lives. Some like me got attacked by stones when we tried to stop them,” said one man named Govinda, pushing his hair back to show a wound on his forehead. The rioters then moved onto their holy books. Showing torn pages of Geeta, the Maharaj’s eyes welled up with tears. “They ripped pages from the old Geeta, and took away the new one.” A broken piece of Radha’s face lay on the floor. A picture of well-known philanthropist Ruth Pfau, who supported an NGO that built the temple, was also torn.

The protesters, who left no stone unturned, then entered nearby houses, snatching gold earrings from newly-married Lakshmi and mangal sutars from others. Another Pathani displayed a scar on her ear where men had ripped out her only gold possession, a single earring. Hurling stones at houses, they also injured a woman who was washing clothes.

The locals had no idea what the protestors were rallying about before they entered the area. All they knew that they were angry with ‘the Americans’. “We are not Americans. We have no link with them. Why were we attacked?” said a resident. This was not the first such incident in the area.

The mob finally ran away when Sikh men in the locality reached the spot with their traditional daggers, kirpans. Since the incident, no prayers have been held at the temple. Men have stopped going to work. Children are afraid to play outside.

“We are Pakistanis. We have never been to India. Let us live here,” said the Maharaj.

Long way to go

Welcoming the move by the local police, Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) Chairperson Zohra Yusuf added, however, that she had never heard of a blasphemy case registered against Muslims for damaging a house of worship.“When Ahmadi houses of worship are attacked, blasphemy sections are not inserted. Also, minorities are fearful to lodge complaints.”

Her concern is lent credence by the fact that four churches in the city have been attacked in 2012, but no FIR against their desecration has been registered. HRCP council member Asad Iqbal Butt, who visited the temple, called it the responsibility of the government to rebuild the temple. “We also demand a boundary wall for the Hindus.” Butt said he called up various Hindu panchayats for help, but no one responded. “Had it been a rich Hindu community, the panchayats would have reacted otherwise,” he said.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 30th, 2012.

re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

If we want to make our voices heard on the international scene regarding our sensitivities to the blasphemy of the prophet (SAllalahu alaihi wa aalihi wassalam) we need to be mindful of the sensitivities of other faiths as well, lead from the front.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

WTH.

Blasphamy??? why are they islamizeing hinduism. there is no concept of blasphamy in hinduism. please release those scumbags and re-arrest them for vandalism.

In fact why touch them at all, arrest the people who are harassing minorities. gods can take care of themselves.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

No one is Islamising Hinduism. The blasphemy law has clauses for preventing blasphemous activities against all religions, not just Islam. It's that they have never been invoked before, it's good if they are used so as to discourage the scoundrels carrying out these activities.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

^^ making blasphemy laws for a religion who doesnt believe in it !!

no it is not good to kill a scumbag just because he destroyed a statue of god. just charge for vandalism.

Its a black law to begin with and should be abolished.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

^^^ You have exact same law in India since British day’s. Here is section 295A of Indian penal code.

India’s Blasphemy Law: Section 295A of IPC ~ c

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

kaka they are not arrested yet.

Hinduism may not contain such blasphemy concepts, but IMO these steps and law will help a little to promote the idea that each religion is dearest to its followers and no one should act against others religion, if people want respect for their religion too.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

^^ Its a british law. but has it ever been invoked in India?

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

I understand your intentions but this is not the right way.

Idea of blasphamy is not ours, not only we dont believe in it but we also think it is stupid.

People should respect others religion because they want to , not because there is a law.

Why charge someone for something they didnt do.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

By this analogy a murderer should also not be charged, because the murderer also don't have respect / care for others life.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

By this analogy charge a murderer for murder, not for tax evasion.

it was a simple case of vandalism of a religious place. charge them for it.

See, followers of gods have always been tested through out the ages. their statues were broken by non believers, their religious places were destroyed, they were exiled, executed and ridiculed.
now a simple act of vandalism cannot hurt religious sentiments of people. It surely hurts ego, honour and your sense of security but no way it hurts religious sentiments.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

laws should be preventive. Punishment comes at later stages.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

Interesting development. I googled, but couldn't find a single Pakistani report about the vandalism that happened on 21st September. The vandalism took place in the financial capital of Pakistan, not some remote corner [like the Church-burning in K-P]. I wonder if this sort of self-censorship is the norm when it comes to embarrassing news regarding minorities, especially Hindus.

I take it that not a single accused has been arrested till now. Future developments will determine, if this is a stunt to soften the image of "Blasphemy Laws" in the eyes of international press, or there is some genuine goodwill involved.

BTW I am with kaka_in_usa on this. There was no need to invoke Blasphemy Laws in this case. The vandals could have been arrested on charges of vandalism, destruction of property, inciting hatred, etc. This further legitimizes the Blasphemy Laws, which will be bad for minorities in the long run. IMHO.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

^^
Could not agree more with this. It is a joke. There has not been a single arrest and it is just an eye wash to deviate the topic from the biggger issue. It is just sad that these incidents happen and no action is taken against the perpetrators.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

Shouldn't be a blasphemy law anyway, but that's just me.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy


i remember an artist being thrown in jail in india for drawing a portrait of mohammed years before the danish cartoons.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

you may want to think there is 'censorhip' 'especially Hindus' but in this time there is no such thing, even the 'sacred army' is not left alone.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

Is this kid trying to troll or what?

Vandalism of a religious building could have been (and most likely was) motivated by bigotry, which is why it's called a hate crime. Consider it the difference between degrees of murder. Vandalizing religious property has intent.

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

:smack:

Re: Attackers of Hindu temple charged with blasphemy

Please read again. Self-censorship rather than state censorship. Every media outlet practices it.