I was watching the news yesterday and caught something along the lines of " America will bomb the muslim places".
Anyone elaborate on this please?
Re: Attack on Holy places!
With enemies of Holy places like our own Mullahs, USA doesn't need to bomb the mosques.
Is it America that fills these mosques with AK-47,
Is it America who spread anarchy?
No!
The answer is our own Mullahs.
Re: Attack on Holy places!
I was watching the news yesterday and caught something along the lines of " America will bomb the muslim places".
Anyone elaborate on this please?
Tom Credo, Republican party candidate said that..darn it..why must Pakistan/Muslims be sacrificed at the altar of American politics. This is as stupid as it gets. Don't they have any issue to talk about in US anymore?
Re: Attack on Holy places!
Just some retarded republican... Hardly worth paying attention to such Arse holes.
Re: Attack on Holy places!
Tom Credo, Republican party candidate said that..darn it..why must Pakistan/Muslims be sacrificed at the altar of American politics. This is as stupid as it gets. Don't they have any issue to talk about in US anymore?
His name is Tom Tancredo. You should read what he has to say about Mexicans. Pakistan/Muslims are going to take a beating everytime terrorism becomes a topic of discussion. fortunately, he has close to no chance in winning the presidency.
Re: Attack on Holy places!
I used short form for his name and i’ve read some of his statements 
he’s just sore the world doesn’t think he worthwhile.
Re: Attack on Holy places!
Tom Credo, Republican party candidate said that..darn it..why must Pakistan/Muslims be sacrificed at the altar of American politics. This is as stupid as it gets. Don't they have any issue to talk about in US anymore?
Addition to above, does general american public want this to happen??? because they want to potray themselves as hard hitters on Muslims, are these the sentiments of general americans?
Re: Attack on Holy places!
American muslims aside, i cant see why the ordinary yank wouldnt want this to happen?
Re: Attack on Holy places!
Exactly. Funny thing is that he is a son of Italian immigrants himself. Hardly a old tradition WASP.
For him is open season on hatred toward Islam, Mexicans and basically anyone who is brown, black.
Re: Attack on Holy places!
Would love to see them try…
Re: Attack on Holy places!
i’m so sick of this pak bashing, SAD LOSERS, makes my blood boil 
!!!
Re: Attack on Holy places!
I second that
Re: Attack on Holy places!
i dunno anythin is possible nowadays!
Re: Attack on Holy places!
Before derring USA to try and attack, you will be wise to understand a few facts. I'll hasten to caution that given the credible source I've read these from and putting 2 and 2 together, I believe it but you should read and come to your own conclusions.The 1st step in any direct US Pak conflict will be the disablement of Pak's nuclear capabiity. This is to prevent a situation where Pak can hold Israel and India hostage. A full list (with very minor gaps) of all nuclear assets and locations including the surprisingly negligible mobile locations have been provided to US. This was a condition underwhich the 2001 push by US on India for retraint was conducted. Between economic threat by US on India (read last Business week, article by Jack Welch) and assurance of nuke info custodial, is what made India back track on the 'decisive now' cry.The Indo US nuke deal combined wikth open statement that Pakistan is different and cannot have a deal, is basically the final verdict that US is fully prepared to take their gloves of.
Re: Attack on Holy places!
He said that if there is a nuclear attack on US by muslims, US should nuke muslim holy places. I think that's fairly logical from an American perspective.
Re: Attack on Holy places!
I think he said we should have nuclear attack on mecca etc. in response to a "terrorist attack". I didn't see nuclear terrorism mentioned there..
Re: Attack on Holy places!
He said that if there is a nuclear attack on US by muslims, US should nuke muslim holy places. I think that's fairly logical from an American perspective.
so as a result of attack on iraq muslims shoud bomb pop's residence is rom??
Re: Attack on Holy places!
Before derring USA to try and attack, you will be wise to understand a few facts. I'll hasten to caution that given the credible source I've read these from and putting 2 and 2 together, I believe it but you should read and come to your own conclusions.The 1st step in any direct US Pak conflict will be the disablement of Pak's nuclear capabiity. This is to prevent a situation where Pak can hold Israel and India hostage. A full list (with very minor gaps) of all nuclear assets and locations including the surprisingly negligible mobile locations have been provided to US. This was a condition underwhich the 2001 push by US on India for retraint was conducted. Between economic threat by US on India (read last Business week, article by Jack Welch) and assurance of nuke info custodial, is what made India back track on the 'decisive now' cry.The Indo US nuke deal combined wikth open statement that Pakistan is different and cannot have a deal, is basically the final verdict that US is fully prepared to take their gloves of.
If what you say is true I cannot believe it actually happened. Pakistan is destined for slavery if this true.
On the other hand it can be faulty intelligence. I hope we didn't sell our soul.
Re: Attack on Holy places!
Addition to above, does general american public want this to happen??? because they want to potray themselves as hard hitters on Muslims, are these the sentiments of general americans?
Dear Hanibal, it's not! Muslims have a lot more rights to practice their religion freely than most of the Islamic countries such as Pakistan. Don't pay heed to what the ignorant fools have to say
Re: Attack on Holy places!
Before derring USA to try and attack, you will be wise to understand a few facts.** I'll hasten to caution that given the credible source I've read **these from and putting 2 and 2 together, I believe it but you should read and come to your own conclusions.The 1st step in any direct US Pak conflict will be the disablement of Pak's nuclear capabiity. This is to prevent a situation where Pak can hold Israel and India hostage. A full list (with very minor gaps) of all nuclear assets and locations including the surprisingly negligible mobile locations have been provided to US. This was a condition underwhich the 2001 push by US on India for retraint was conducted. Between economic threat by US on India (read last Business week, article by Jack Welch) and assurance of nuke info custodial, is what made India back track on the 'decisive now' cry.The Indo US nuke deal combined wikth open statement that Pakistan is different and cannot have a deal, is basically the final verdict that US is fully prepared to take their gloves of.
Please post real references, negating fiction based journals & comics.