Re: ATHEISTS .... explain
Ok I am ready accept if you it can be verified. I am ready to take individual qualities, but the only problem is the known qualities are also based only on faith.
You should be answering that not me, theists say God is unknowable. I say only non-existance is unknowable.
And it is not because the lack of knowledge only, its also the lack of evidence.
I have no problem with limited knowledge but limited unverifiable knowledge is something else totally.
Again a matter of faith, unverifiable.
Again a matter of faith, unverifiable.
...or our words take on the role of allegory and metaphor, which are crucial to enhance the expressive power of language. Indeed, if the whole purpose of revelation is to relate God's will to human existence, such a means is almost neccessary. Revelation is human-centric.
Why? They are the closest approximation.
Neither you nor Mr. Ferre seemed to have caught on to this rather obvious possiblity...
Language is always an approximation of reality. English, for example, is a very blunt way to describe nature. Math is a much better way. But then, Math is as far as we can go...
Thats exactly what I mean if the language of the manual are inadequate how can you say that the machine which I designed based on these manual are as per the design, how would you even know the difference. All you can do with approximate knowledge is approximate job.
Sorry I am not very good with maths but as I understand that also works on 2+2=4 not 2+2 approximately equal to 4.