Atheism

[calypsodc]

Re: Atheism

@hareem01

Israeli rese… JPost - Health & Sci-Tech - Science & Environment

In Richard Leaky (an atheist)'s words,

" “If pressed about man’s ancestry, I would have to unequivocally say that all we have is a huge question mark. To date, there has been nothing found to truthfully purport as a transitional specie to man, including Lucy, since 1470 was as old and probably older. If further pressed, I would have to state that there is more evidence to suggest an abrupt arrival of man rather than a gradual process of evolving.”

Same can happen to Ardi…in 10,20 years we might find out it’s a pygmy chimpanzee or something.

Good to know.

Now can you please elucidate the “theory” that you believe in ? How is it superior to what you call “evolution theory” ? Point by point explanation would be most helpful. I find creationism/Intelligent design nonsensical so please convince me otherwise.
Like Psyah said “My theory is better because it does not need so much complexity … It is a simple theory.”, I hope U r not trying to propogate something similar. I and a few like-minded individuals can band together and promote a new “theory” that planet Venus is made of cheese and pearl dust. How can anybody disprove it ? Has anybody set foot on Venus ? How do you even know I am not correct ? This is sounds exactly like what a few people here are trying to do . I remember a time when we studied about Niel Amrstrong and his moon landing in primary school and a couple of muslim kids tried to convince the class that Niel Armstrong and Co were not the first people on the moon since they had discovered human footprints there already which was made by their prophet who had undertaken this journey back in the 7th century. Ofcourse USA was covering up this fact :hoonh: . I was so impressed that I had told the parents who did not know whether to be mad or amused by this little gem of a fact. Honestly what is with people trying to justify their religion through science ?