atheism vs science & real face of atheism

Re: atheism vs science & real face of atheism

You know what i mean by ‘second option’.

  1. Being lazy does not lead one to atheism unless he is told by someone the ‘second option’
  2. Again someone must be there to tell him the second option.
  3. Who make it persuasive enough for them? What is the benefit they get by propagating this persuasion material?
    For example, ‘living beings evolved from non-living’ part is found in classic books but this part somehow could not get the place in Wikipedia, why?
  4. kind of agreed as they do not practice the religion. But again, they are easily impressed by that ‘persuasion’.
  5. China is different case as said above.
  6. Being an atheist and propogating atheist beliefs as ‘scientific facts’ are two different things, and that is our topic.