Re: atheism vs science & real face of atheism
You know what i mean by ‘second option’.
- Being lazy does not lead one to atheism unless he is told by someone the ‘second option’
- Again someone must be there to tell him the second option.
- Who make it persuasive enough for them? What is the benefit they get by propagating this persuasion material?
For example, ‘living beings evolved from non-living’ part is found in classic books but this part somehow could not get the place in Wikipedia, why? - kind of agreed as they do not practice the religion. But again, they are easily impressed by that ‘persuasion’.
- China is different case as said above.
- Being an atheist and propogating atheist beliefs as ‘scientific facts’ are two different things, and that is our topic.