atheism vs science & real face of atheism

[kakaballi]

Re: atheism vs science & real face of atheism

@ajazali

it seems that it has generally been accepted that whatever atheists speak is science…

No. It can be Russian or Chinese.

@ajazali

Yes diwana, you are right that this discussion is not going anywehre. but the purpose of this thread is bit different that is to tell people that not every belief of atheists is science.

and followers of every religion believes it is one true religion and others are incorrect. So, not every belief of religious people cannot be TRUE. In the same way, atheists have different beliefs and some of them might be rediculous to you and some reasonable.

I am sure you will find some of the beliefs Mormons have as rediculous. Shall I then say that all beliefs or religions are rediculous? Hell, even Sunnis would find some of the beliefs of Shias as rediculous and vice versa. When you cannot find one set of beliefs within one religion, why expect atheists to be all sane and sceintific?

@rainydays

…Science itself has never rejected the existence of God. …

or existance of mermaids, unicorns, hogwarts, etc.

I don’t know why people try to pain all atheists into one color. Atheism is NOT a religion. It is not a cohesive body of people following one set of beliefs. There are people who do not believe in God because;

1. they are lazy to do all praying and stuff; or
2. they do no find any evidence of existance of a super diety; or
3. they find some scientific theories and evidence persuasive enough to negate religious beliefs;
4. they do not know which religion to follow;
5. they were born in China; etc.

You see, it is not ALL science.

Religion can be beautiful. It is called ‘faith’ because you cannot ‘prove’ it all correct. If it were the case, it would be called ‘fact’, not ‘faith’. Religious people tend to humiliate themselves in an attempt to redicule atheists with arguments like “science belives human beings evolved from rocks”.