let me help you sweetie.
First of all it is a misnomer that it was a bust. It was a crises..not a bust. it was a currency, balance of payments crises not a meltdown of the economy.
1) In 1997 as most Tiger currencies were pegged to the dollar, Thailand decided that it's reserves were strong enough to let the Baht float. What precipitated was a devaluation of the Thai currency and the inability fo the Tahi gov't due to the anemic reserves to stop the freefall.
Because it was originally pegged to the dollar, the approeciation of the dollar in the mid-90's, meant overvaluation of the Baht. Because of this overvaluation the exports of the thai gov't were going down hill, thus the reserves were anemic.
2) A lot of short term capital investment (ala china as we see today, where are those knuckleheads who cliam Great China blah, blha ,blah). Currency traders and Asian funds pumped up investment in real estate and early exit strategy investment vehicles. Creating an asset-bubble. As NPA's increased in the short amount of time, people pulled the money out. Capital FLIGHT!!!! (HELLLOOOOOOOO China)
3) I don;t rememeber but I also think there were some fiscal problems, rising labor costs due to capital dumping and competition from china etc..
4) No transparency in reporting. Unlike the stringent reporting standards in the US, Europe adn India (yes India), these chutiy*** had no controls palced on cap adequacy etc..
5) Speculation: Income george soros and merton scholes..wah ji wah...the currency traders shorted the currencies and the capital markets tooks a dive.
Spillover effect happened in almost all the asian countries, kindof like their bird flu.
IMF and WB(ADB) basically established longterm and short term bailout packages which provided for propping up the currencies over a period of time, ensuring better governance and financial oversight and giving guidance to the monetary authorities of the affected countries to ensure greater diligence and fisacl discpline in regulating.