Articles about the Aussies victory

Indian’s sledging fires Gilchrist
March 25 2003

Johannesburg: A mouthful of abuse from India’s nervous wreck of a fast bowler Zaheer Khan sparked Adam Gilchrist’s scoring frenzy in Australia’s win.

Zaheer delivered two wides and two no-balls in a disastrous first over that cost 15 runs and eased a mountain of pressure on the Australians after Indian captain Sourav Ganguly had sent them in to bat.

“Zaheer came in and bowled the very first ball and then came down and gave me a gobful,” said Gilchrist, whose 57 from 48 balls in a 105-run opening stand with Matthew Hayden set the tone for Australia’s victory.

"I played and missed at the next one, he gave me another gobful, and I think that’s the last thing he said all day. I got off strike, Haydos hit him for four, then he bowled four wides. I thought, ‘Right, let’s really try and put something on them here’.

“We didn’t think we’d score at six or seven an over. We just wanted to have good, positive body language and almost let them show how nervous and intimidated they were. We had them down - they looked so nervous and unsure as to what they were going to do.”

Hayden was subdued by comparison, making 37 from 54 balls, taking a back seat while Gilchrist hit eight fours and a six.

“I sit back on my bat handle and watch the highlights package, basically,” Hayden said. “I can’t really afford to get caught up in Gilly’s tempo.”

Hayden had a moderate World Cup by his standards, making 328 runs at 32.8. Gilchrist made 408 at 40.8.

Gilchrist praised the Australian team for overcoming many off-field dramas, including his own racial abuse claim against Pakistan’s Rashid Latif, Shane Warne’s drug suspension, the Zimbabwe security issue and injuries to several leading players.

“It just felt like there was so much against us and so many people didn’t want us to win,” he said. “But the campaign felt so smooth, composed and low-key.”

AAPhttp://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/03/24/1048354545395.html

The day Australia attained perfection
By Alex Brown in Johannesburg
March 25 2003

Perfect game. Best one-day team in history. Ricky Ponting’s all-conquering team has even seemed invincible, to use a word that resonates in the Australian cricketing psyche.

The side’s undefeated World Cup campaign and 17-game winning streak were cited by Michael Bevan as proof that no other nation could compete with the Australians. Ditto, said the NSW one-day batting specialist, for teams from any era, including the great West Indies squads of the 1970s and '80s.

While Brett Lee and Darren Lehmann described Sunday’s 125-run victory over India as “the perfect game”, Bevan went a step further, saying: "The enjoyable thing for me is being part of a team that could well be the best one-day team in history.

"Statistics suggest that, but that only comes from longevity, so it’s a time thing. Hopefully, if we keep doing what we’re doing in two or three years’ time then we’ve set a new standard and you can claim to be that. I suppose not many other teams have achieved what we’ve achieved.

“It’s great to be a part of the Australian side like it is at the moment. It’s awesome. Everyone’s challenging each other to become better. You definitely feel the presence or the aura of being a part of a side like this.”

After Australia surged to their highest one-day total, 2-359, aided by their highest one-day partnership, 234, based on the highest individual innings in a World Cup final, 140 not out, Lee’s and Lehmann’s “perfect game” synopsis seems more than fair.

Records, however, don’t tell the whole story. According to Ponting, who scored that unbeaten 140 and shared the record stand with Damien Martyn, the true measure of Australia’s greatness has been their ability to overcome adversity.

First, all-rounder Shane Watson withdrew injured before the tournament began. Then, leg-spinning maestro Shane Warne tested positive for a banned drug, leaving the team on the day of its World Cup opener against Pakistan. And when Jason Gillespie flew home midway through the tournament, again through injury, Ponting believes a lesser side might have crumbled.

That, he added, fails to mention the intense emotions that surrounded the Zimbabwe security negotiations, the controversy regarding Lehmann’s suspension for a racial slur, the drama of Adam Gilchrist’s racial abuse charge against Pakistan’s Rashid Latif.

“To [score a century] when it counted today, in a big game, I mean, it’s the best moment in my life by a mile … cricketing moment,” Ponting said. "We’ve been really tested through this World Cup with our fair share of injuries and obviously with the Warney issue as well. We were really tested there and the guys that have come in, Andy Bichel and Andrew Symonds, those guys have just had sensational World Cups and, you know, it just says a lot about our depth.

"I suppose you’ve got to look at the game today and realise that they [India] are a very good side and we’ve beaten them pretty comprehensively. I think that, in itself, says we’re a fair way ahead of what was the second-best side in the World Cup.

“The pleasing thing … is that we’ve done it all fairly quietly, just gone about our business right the way through the World Cup. The 17th straight win doesn’t mean much to us either. What does mean a lot to us is the standards that we set for our side and they are very high, and we’ve reached and almost set higher standards today, so that was the very pleasing thing that came for today’s game.”

Lehmann, meanwhile, could not recall a more complete one-day international victory than Australia’s demolition of India - a team that entered Sunday’s match at the Wanderers with eight straight victories. “We played the perfect game, that’s all we were after at the end of the final,” he said. “It was just a great feeling to get 359 and play the perfect game batting-wise and put them under pressure with the ball. I thought we bowled and fielded really well in this game as well, which is good. We did the whole thing, much like '99, really. That final was pretty much a cakewalk.”

Lee and Symonds rated Sunday’s victory as lifetime highlights - Symonds’s eyes misting over when asked to recount his World Cup final experience.

Lee rated the win as perfect, the experience as emotional.

“It’s definitely up there as the most brilliant thing that’s ever happened to me as a cricketer and an athlete,” Lee said. “The way that [Ponting] led the team and the way that the guys all hugged each other and just got out when we got the last wicket, the guys, it just meant so much to us, we’ve just worked so hard for it. Words can’t explain how we felt at that exact time, so it’s a pretty terrific moment.”

Bevan concurred, pondering the possibility that this Australian side may eclipse the Clive Lloyd-led West Indian squads of the 1970s and ‘80s as the greatest yet seen. Certainly, statistics indicate as much - the West Indies’ longest winning streak was 11 matches.

But, Bevan said, the brutality with which Australia have dispatched opponents - more than any other factor - is testament to the side’s stature as the world’s top one-day side.

“Today was just a culmination of continually beating teams and asserting our authority and how good we were as a team,” he said. "In 1999 there was that two- or three-week period where we had to play awesome cricket. Because we had talented guys with great attitudes and we came away with an amazing victory.

"This one was more satisfying given the fact that for the last year and a half we’ve been building brick on brick and continually winning and becoming a better side.

"It’s a great moment. I guess I’ve been lucky enough to be a part of three World Cup finals, two of those we won.

“In the last World Cup final I didn’t get to bat either in that final, which was great in terms of the way we played that game. I guess that means we’re playing good cricket. One of the special things is being part of a team that’s formed like it has in the last 12 months.”

Big numbers
March 25 2003

Channel Nine's live telecast of Sunday night's World Cup final was the most watched program so far this year.

Nationally, the match had a peak audience of 2,647,368, the channel said. In Sydney, the highest audience of 835,558 came at 10.15pm, near the end of the Australian innings.

AAP

Brett Lee was the most exciting

March 24, 2003

Sourav Ganguly did the right thing by opting to bowl first when he won the toss at The Wanderers. Had Ricky Ponting won it, he would have done the same thing, and his bowlers would probably have bundled out India for 150 – the conditions were so much in favour of the bowlers. Walking off after the toss, Ganguly would probably have been quite chuffed up since his seamers had served him well right through the tournament.

All that changed within the first 15 minutes of the match. The Indian bowlers were a little too tight and tense and this resulted in a very poor bowling performance. They hit a poor length and were far too short. In the first couple of overs itself both Matthew Hayden and Adam Gilchrist went hard at the bowlers, and this completely unhinged both Zaheer and Nehra. If one bowler had said: ‘Hang on, what we need here is not extra pace, all we have to do is pitch the ball on a little area because the conditions will do the rest.’ Sadly for India that did not happen, and the Indian bowlers got worse as they panicked more and more. Even a consistent bowler like Javagal Srinath was way too short and inaccurate on a big day. With the steady flow of wides and no-balls the Indians completely lost the plot.

The best part of the Australian batting was the way they sustained the run-rate established by Gilchrist and Hayden. The Indians were back in the game at 125 for two. However, Damien Martyn played a wonderful hand in order to keep the momentum going. Ricky Ponting was struggling for his first 20-30 runs, but Martyn’s superb strokeplay ensured that the Indians did not get the upper hand at any stage. Later, when Ponting came into his own, Martyn took a back seat and let his captain take control. This is the stuff of great partnerships and by the end of the innings, they had already won the match.

For the Indians, it all depended on Sachin Tendulkar. He had two options at the start of the innings. Either to look to play out the 50 overs so that he could launch an offensive against the fifth bowler and during the last 10 overs or he could play his shots in the first 15 overs and try to get his team to 130. He chose the latter option, and was going for premeditated shots. The four he hit was not a great shot, and the next one was pretty ghastly. It was always going to be tough to take on Lee and McGrath and even Tendulkar could not pull it off.

The body language was not good when the Indians came out to bat. I don’t know what was said at lunch but even a player like Rahul Dravid was looking to go slam bang from the start.

Did Sachin finally deserve to be the Man of the Tournament? Well, the facts and the figures would suggest that, but I’ve often seen that statistics can give a wrong picture. If one goes by instincts, Brett Lee was the most exciting player this World Cup. There are also lots of experts who feel Sachin never fires against the top drawn bowlers when it matters most, so that blot would remain in the final analysis. Some day he will prove his critics wrong, but yesterday was not that day.

The Indians have plenty to be proud of in this tournament. If they had been told that they would be finalists, just after their Holland game, they would have gladly taken it. Even 18 months from now, they would be proud of the way they have played these six weeks. The Australians landed a knock-out punch yesterday, but the runners-up really entertained everyone till then.

(Gameplan)

Finally let’s take a quick look at the ICC ODI ratings (there might be minor rounding off errors):

Aus (137), SA (123), Pak (110), SL (108), Ind (103), WI (99), NZ (98), Eng (98) and Zim (63).

"Nobody remembers what you did to get to the final"

Aussies best from start to finish

March 24, 2003

There are some days when you just can't afford to have an off day, and one such day is a World Cup final. Sadly for India, the bowlers who had played so well and bowled so aggressively right through the tournament suddenly got an attack of nerves and let the occasion get to them. They just did not bowl in the right area, and the likes of Adam Gilchrist and Ricky Ponting really made them pay for it.

The way to approach a final is two-fold. At one level it is just another day, and you have to get your basics right and control your emotions. On another level, you have to realise that nobody remembers what you did to get to the final, they only remember what you did in the final. Unfortunately for Sourav Ganguly and his men, Sunday was a day their faculties were just not working, and that made it a very one-sided final.

While the Indians did bowl badly, the batting display from Ricky Ponting was absolutely magnificent. He was batting on a wicket that did have some life in it, but like Gilchrist before him, he just stuck to the basics, took his chances and played without showing any signs of big match nerves. Sure, there were times when the ball went and fell in no-man's land, but when you are brave, luck almost always favours you. Ponting played as though it was just another day, and finally that is what allowed him to play some real audacious cricket in the last seven-eight overs.

However, I did not think the match was over at the break, because I had great faith in the little man, Sachin Tendulkar. I don't think many Indians could be more disappointed than I am because I had wanted him to come out firing on all cylinders. If he and Virender Sehwag had got a partnership going, things would have been very, very different. The Indians kept up a decent rate right till the end of their innings in spite of losing regular wickets. This means that if Tendulkar was there, he would have instilled confidence in his teammates and the total would not have looked as formidable as it did in the end. I would fault him for poor shot selection, but the way he has been playing all through the tournament, he must have backed himself to pull off that shot in the first over itself. On another day it might have clicked -- after all he has taken on Glenn McGrath on many occasions -- but on the day it mattered most to him, it failed. I know Tendulkar, and I know it must be hurting. For him the fact that he let the team down rather than the fact that his critics will be after him again is what will worry him.

At the end of the day, the Australians were the best team from start to finish. Their professional approach and ability to keep focus on winning was indeed impressive. They were tested on occasions but they invariably came out with flying colours. Their philosophy: "Never beaten till the end" is an inspiring one, and should be taken on board by many other teams. There is no doubt, they are the trailblazers of the new century.

The Indians did not shame themselves either. But for their games against Australia, they played impressive cricket. What they must ask themselves is whether they were a little too happy at making the final. Sometimes, that seems achievement enough, and some individuals lose sight of the fact that once you get that far, you MUST carry on to take that one step more. Many good teams have made the final, but only a few great ones take that extra step to become a champion team. That's the difference between a good team and a great team.

(Gameplan)

Australia extends lead at top of ICC ODI rankings

ICC Media Release - 24 March 2003

Australia's 11 match unbeaten run on the way to retaining the ICC Cricket World Cup has extended its lead at the top of the ICC ODI Championship table to 13 points.

At the end of 2002, Australia's rating was only five higher than its closest rival South Africa but an unprecedented run of 17 consecutive victories has opened up a record gap.

Its rating of 136 - four more than it was at the start of the tournament – is the highest ranking recorded since the ICC ODI Championship was launched in October 2002.

It means that as well as taking home the ICC Cricket World Cup trophy, Australia also retains the ICC ODI Championship Shield that Ricky Ponting first collected from ICC President Malcolm Gray at the Sydney Cricket Ground in December 2003.

India were unable to match Australia at the Wanderers but progression to the final helped boost its rating by four, pulling Sourav Ganguly's team away from West Indies, New Zealand and England.

With Pakistan and Sri Lanka's ratings both falling, India has moved to within striking distance of third place in the table.

Kenya has been the biggest beneficiary from the tournament, increasing its rating by 10. Victories over Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Zimbabwe have seen Kenya open up a gap of 24 ratings points from Bangladesh at the bottom of the table.

ICC ODI Championship Table (correct at the end of the ICC CWC 2003)

Ranking Team Pld Rating (Rating on 8th Feb 2003)
1 Australia 46 136 (132)
2 South Africa 53 123 (126)
3 Pakistan 45 110 (114)
4 Sri Lanka 57 108 (110)
5 India 54 103 (99)
6 West Indies 35 99 (99)
7 New Zealand 45 98 (97)
8 England 34 98 (98)
9 Zimbabwe 40 63 (66)
10 Kenya 22 30 (20)
11 Bangladesh 19 6 (10)

Developed by David Kendix

How the ICC ODI rankings work:

The formula used by the ICC to determine ranking positions takes into account the following factors:

  • results from all ODI matches played over the previous two to three years
  • strength of opposition, with greater reward for beating higher ranked opponents
  • greater importance is placed on more recent results, with older matches dropped every 12 months
  • all matches have equal status, with no account taken of venue or margin of victory For the full formula visit www.icc.cricket.org.

Media Contacts:

In South Africa:
Brendan McClements: 083 417 5494
Mark Harrison: 083 417 5492

In England:
Jon Long +44 (0) 207 266 7912
[email protected]

Indians mired in gloom over World Cup loss
Kunal Pradhan - 23 March 2003

NEW DELHI, March 23 (Reuters) - A pall of gloom descended on India after its cricket team suffered a 125-run thrashing at the hands of Australia in the World Cup in Johannesburg on Sunday.

Cricket-crazy fans across the country of one billion people were glued to their television sets for the eight-hour match, bringing India to a halt, as the two teams clashed at Wanderers.

But they suffered disappointment as Australia racked up a huge 359 from their 50 overs and then bowled out the Indians for 234 despite a fighting 82 by opener Virender Sehwag.

"We were just stunned by the way the Australians hit us. I'm totally disappointed. But they showed just how great they are," said 24-year-old New Delhi medical student Saket Girotra.

Fans had planned big parties for Sunday evening, hoping for an Indian victory after the country made the final for the first time since winning at Lord's in England in 1983.

But the festivities were scrapped in a hurry.

"I'm very sad and depressed. We'd planned big celebrations for today. India just crumbled under pressure and Australia played like true champions," said Mumbai-based film-maker Sejal Shah. "But at least we beat Pakistan in the tournament."

India won nine of 11 matches in the World Cup, including a celebrated victory earlier this month over arch-rivals Pakistan that sent the nation into a frenzy of delight.

But on Sunday, fans were reduced to praying for rain, which interrupted action for 25 minutes after India had played 17 overs, and could have forced the match to be replayed on Monday.

SECOND CHANCE

"We prayed for rain with the Geeta (Hindu holy book) open in front of us," said Kolkata banker Ivy Tandon. "We were sure India would have won tomorrow given a second chance.

"We'd planned to drink half a bottle of champagne today and half tomorrow."

Just last month, fans across the country erupted in anger over India's poor start to the tournament following a nine-wicket loss in the league stage to Australia.

Effigies of leading players were burnt, captain Sourav Ganguly was given a mock funeral and black paint was hurled at batsman Mohammad Kaif's house in the northern city of Allahabad.

But fans were in a more forgiving mood after the final.

"We made it to the World Cup final. That's quite an achievement," said New Delhi book editor Pankaj Sharma.

"Let's accept it, Australia were just too good. We could've done better but there's no shame in losing to them."

© Reuters