General Hamid Gul speaks on behalf Taliban because he have seen him for 10 years, all fights , plans, meetings, weapons , deployment, master mind was Hameed Gul, he burnt the fire of Kabul for 10 years alongwith his Boss Akthar Abdul Rehman and atlast defeated Red Bear, he remained in the battle with these warriors and he can feel thier pulse rightly ! He knows that by force nobody can defeat afghanis,its thier 3000 years history from Alexander, Tajik,Uzbaks,who are ruling today in Afghanistan instead of 65% majority Pakhtuns and now the jocker of Kabbul in the feet of Saudi King, begging for truce,supported secretly by NATO and US forces to have ‘honourable’ exit plan just like of Geneva of 1988.Hamid Gul was the best candidtae of C in C after Gen Baig , headed the Corp 1 of Multan ,professionaly very competant and aggressive plan maker , think tnak, wrote a paper in 1986 for the plan to conquer central asia. but Bainazir,as usual got a red signal from Washington urged him to retire though IGI making in 1988 was also one of the cause, but Gul is taken as ‘dangerous Man’ in Washington always for his religious rightist approach unlike more of the secular,modern Generals of Pak Armed Forces. A fight which cannot be win, Gul knows well as he has seen and fought with those people for 10 years.
Threr are 1000’s of scientists in multiple divisions of PAEC, KRL, NESCOM, AWC, NDC etc .If one or 2 have some temptations towards Talibans, its not means the whole bunch is to be taken care of. By the way,many of these stories are cooked up for sensation and hot cake purpose for best seller in the mart just like we have seen the Doctrate of Nueroscience have nothing to do with chemicals or WMDS, but those heroin farosh Afghans and US officals kept that poor lady and her children for 5 years. I think you should see ‘Khuda kai Liyai’ where Shaan after 9/11 caught just for the ‘Taweez’ usually given by some Peer Faqeer with arabic numerals on it and 9 and 11 was written on it as we call it 'Ilm-ul-Aadad ’ and poor guy have to see ‘Drawiing Room’ as Americans were connecting those numerals with secret codes and grid structure of NYC.
I have also read many such Rs. 2 novel usually found on footpaths of Anarkali and Railway Station blending with secret agencies, boss with niqab ,nuclear laboratory, some sort of Inspector Jamshed like thing as Tenet seems to be in this third class film story and all ends with bullets and blood , all to villan and anti state elements by miracle ! Nuclear canister, designs to explode ,secret meetings, haha…
Nukes are not exploded with diagrams and remote control buttons having 1/0 switch and green/red LEDs to show successful explosions! Dude come out of these 2 2 paisas jasoosi novels stories, it needs multiple decoding stages , loading with warheads, sophisticated delivery system ,and many many more things. Startegic Planning Division and 10,000 armed personals are watch dogs for nukes which are spreaded in 7 to 8 different unknown places of Pakistan(any air hot surprise by Israel or US will do nothing as they r spreaded) , your cooked up stories cannot make such dangerous weapons , a cake-pice for some fanatics !
a number of nuclear scientists of Pakistan are extremly fanatic and have worked /are working under religious devoution.
Besides AQ, how many nuclear scientist can you name? Lets hear it. Once you name a few, do tell which ones are fanatic and on what basis are you calling them fanatic. If you cant come up with something concrete, please stop posting crap.
The flaw with that theory is that an unstable Pakistan is one that is more likely to lose control of one or more nuclear warheads, that could be used in a catastrophic attack against US or western interests.
yes, the plan is to take destablisation to some point where US can intervene to save Pak nukes. and take care of that
**
The US unwillingness to attack Iran already reflects that the US is unwilling to risk actions that could lead to terrorist organisations getting nukes (the US cannot destroy all of Iran's nuclear facilities in one go, and does not want to risk Iran retaliating by leaking technology or weapons).
[/quote]
US will not attack iran yet, 1)its heavily engage in tow of Iran neighbouring countries.
2) it suspects to have a response from Iran, US attacks only with almost zero risk policy, as they did in Iraq, - they didnt attack when it had WMD they only did when 10 years sanctions and inspections made sure there are no WMDs taht can be used on US or Israel.
**
These two factors mean that the US has an obvious interest in maintaining a stable Pakistan. If Pakistan's security deteriorates, then so does the US's.
[/quote]
US has apparent interest in maintaining a stable India than Pakistan. They dont worry about Pak nukes, Israel and India are worried. protection of Israel is utmost requirement for US. they want to destablise and devide Pakistan between India and Afghanistan, all working towards it. and certainly they want a non nuke Pakistan.
destablise - a big excuse - save the pak nukes - devide or leave a weaker Pakistan.
...... they want to destablise and devide Pakistan between India and Afghanistan, ......
Must be a deep smoke taken before this gem of intellect.
Amour bro! They can't control Afghanistan in the current state, and you think they want to add more to this gad-awful poverty stricken country. Man oh man. Talk about conspiracy theories.
Pakistan is the one of the largest countries in the world. It is not a piece of chapati that would be cut up and divided among beggars in the neighborhood.
The reality is that Afghanistan which is hardly larger (in resources and population) than just one of our large cities is on the deathbed. NATO and US are begging Pakistan to come take it. Pakistan supplies food, medicine, and all other imports to Afghanistan. And here some Afghanis are wetting their beds thinking that they can send an Afghan warlord to take over Pakistan. Bullay oh Bullay.
yes, the plan is to take destablisation to some point where US can intervene to save Pak nukes. and take care of that
That is paranoid thinking. If Pakistan ever is destabilised enough to require foreign intervention, by then it would be too late to prevent nukes falling into the wrong hands.
The US's interest in the Indo-Pak rivalry is to maintain the balance and make sure neither one destabilises the other - that's why you see both sides being played off against each other, weapons sold and training given to both armed forces.
It needs to maintain Indian stability (as a counterweight to China) and to maintain Pakistani stability (to contain nukes and nuclear knowledge).
That is paranoid thinking. If Pakistan ever is destabilised enough to require foreign intervention, by then it would be too late to prevent nukes falling into the wrong hands.
The US's interest in the Indo-Pak rivalry is to maintain the balance and make sure neither one destabilises the other - that's why you see both sides being played off against each other, weapons sold and training given to both armed forces.
....
Correcto! Conspiracy nutz would disagree though! unfortunately.
....It needs to maintain Indian stability (as a counterweight to China) and to maintain Pakistani stability (to contain nukes and nuclear knowledge).
Correction re: India.
Americans view India as military state responsible for keeping peace in the Indian ocean. Counter weighting China is an old theory that went through the window when the whole Chinese nation became Wal Mart supplier. India has faithfully handled its responsibilities in the Indian Ocean.
Correction re: Pakistan
Americans view Pakistani military as responsible for keeping peace on its "Western" borders and in Arabian Sea. We handled our responsibilities faithfully until 1990s. Then we became too much Islamized and started forgetting that Pakistan and Pakistan's role comes first and Islam comes second. As a result we are paying a heavy price in FATA. This is our own mistake, and we'll come out of it once the Pakistani society and military is cleansed of Islamist generals (both active and retired).
Correction re: nukes
The West practically gave the nukes away to both Pakistan and India. None of them was dragged through dung of international sanctions the way some other countries are being put through.
Why do the West (especially UK and USA) treat Indians and Pakistanis different from Iran and other pipsqueaks. Well the answer is rooted deep in the history of the subcontinent and thus deserves a separate thread.