Arrest Over Cricket 'Match-Fixing' At Lords

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

**Pakistani star Yasir Hameed blows lid off cricket corruption **

INSIGHT: Yasir Hameed claims bent teammates were fixing ‘almost every match’

Player who spurned fixer’s bribes exposes teammates

A PAKISTAN cricketer who played in the rigged Lord’s Test has sensationally confirmed that there WERE cheats in his team.

Respected opening batsman Yasir Hameed claims bent teammates were fixing “almost every match”.

And he provided a devastating insight into the shady world of betting scams, telling how he:

* REFUSED bribes of up to £150,000 from a corrupt bookmaker to throw matches.
* LOST his own place in the squad and saw his career damaged as a result.
* WATCHED as crooked colleagues splashed out on plush properties and expensive sports cars funded by their illicit activities.
* LEARNED that shameless players pocketed an astonishing £1.8million for rigging a Test match against Australia earlier this year.

Hameed, once rated amongst the world’s finest batsmen, said of his scandal-struck colleagues: "They’ve been caught. Only the ones that get caught are branded crooks.

"They were doing it (fixing) in almost every match. God knows what they were up to. Scotland Yard was after them for ages.

“It makes me angry because I’m playing my best and they are trying to lose.”

And, predicting the likely fate of the players exposed by the News of the World, Hameed added darkly: "The guys that have got done have got themselves killed.

“They’re gone - forget about them.”

Hameed’s remarks will heap pressure on the ICC investigation and the preposterous defence thrown up last week by shamed Pakistan skipper Salman Butt, bowlers Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir and their Pakistan Cricket Board bosses.

Sipping white wine in a Nottingham hotel just two days after our revelations sparked a worldwide sensation, Hameed, 32, described how he became a victim of betting cartels’ vengeance for refusing to fix games.

“It’s because of all these wrong things that I was outed, because I wouldn’t get involved,” he told our undercover reporter.

"If you sat here and said, ‘I’m a bookie and I want you to fix the match tomorrow’ - I’ve met lots of people like that in the past and I refused. They offered me handsome money.

"I could have come to see you in a Ferrari. They give you so much money that you can live out your dreams, buy a flash car.

“I’ve been offered huge amounts of money, up to £150,000.”

"I wouldn’t get involved. That’s why I was out of the team for two years - two years! Now God has punished them. I played in the (Lord’s) match. Even though I flopped, these guys have been caught out.

"Just look at my average. It’s 38, 39 (runs scored per innings). Which player in the world has that average and is dropped?

“If I was playing for any other country, what would I be now? I’d be the team captain.”

Hameed’s record supports his case. He had a sensational start to his international career in 2003, scoring 170 runs in his first innings and another 105 in the second, against Bangladesh.

In his first 30 One Day Inter- nationals, he scored more runs than any other batsman. Yet despite that he has bounced in and out of the national team.

“The truth is I’ve never sold a match for Pakistan. I’ve always got by on legitimate money. I come from a middle-class hard-working family,” he said. Hameed detailed how the lure of riches had led some of his comparatively poorly paid teammates to fall for the lure of match-fixers.

By contrast with the limited fees of around £2,000 a match, Hameed said the potential rewards for rigging games were huge.

Detailing the crooked price list of the match-fixers, he said: "The £150,000 (paid to Majeed) was just (a deposit) to show what would happen on this ball, what would happen on the other ball.

"In the future, imagine how much money they would have made. Imagine how many pounds they would have made!

“He (Majeed) pays the players whatever the rate is. I think they get £20,000 or £25,000 for no balls. God knows what was the deal, I didn’t ask.”

Hameed asked why Asif - one of three players at the centre of the scandal who was last week suspended by the ICC - had been able to amass a big property portfolio.

“I’m having a house built and it’s stopped halfway,” said Hameed. "I’m building it from legitimate money and work has stopped.

"Asif - how many matches has he played and how many have I played? I’ve played 80 matches and he’s played around 50. He has four mansions. Where did they come from?

“He has just built a house in Italian style in Lahore. You go there and you will think you are in Italy - that’s how good his house is.”

Hameed also dramatically claimed that another game had been thrown. Talking about fixed matches, he said: “The ICC Champion Trophy, Rose Bowl, we lost a match against West Indies, do you remember?” That was a semi-final game in 2004 at The Rose Bowl in Southampton.

The West Indies won the match by seven wickets despite posting just 132 runs. Pakistan capitulated to 131 all out.

The ICC’s anti-corruption team may well now add the match to another they are investigating - January’s farcical Test Match between Pakistan and Australia in Sydney.

Last week, we revealed how gloating Majeed bragged to our undercover team how they fixed the result.

“We let them (Australia) get up to 150 in the morning, and then everyone lost their wickets. That one we made 1.3 (million).”

Amazingly, Hameed claims Majeed underestimated the cash netted in the scam. He told us: “In the Sydney Test Match they made £1.8million - they gave away the match. I don’t know how the money was divided up.”

Of some agents who swarm around players, Hameed angrily told us: “There are agents but they are ******* bookies basically.”

Turning to Mr Fix-it Mazhar Majeed - the lynchpin of the Lords scandal - Hameed spoke of his relief that he had given the crooked agent a wide berth.

“He had seven players. He didn’t make me an offer and I didn’t want to take a chance. I know what was going on.”

But Hameed remains curiously loyal to shamed skipper Butt.

“He’s a nice guy basically,” he said. “I don’t know why he’s gone like this because of money.”

Re: Arrest Over Cricket 'Match-Fixing' At Lords

^ :/

AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHh

Re: Arrest Over Cricket 'Match-Fixing' At Lords

any idea when scotland yard will reveal its findings? I can't wait till these a-holes get banned for life...all 7 of them whoever was involved....I have no sympathy for these traitors...NONE!

Re: Arrest Over Cricket 'Match-Fixing' At Lords

Have they posted anything about last week's videos and their timings that they were made before the match? Didn't get a chance to check their website last night and right now it is down.

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

Now this is getting extremely ridiculous… what has high commissioner to UK to do with cricket? who has given him powers to declare guilt or innocence or to suggest appropriate punishment?

Pakistan High Commissioner Wajid Shamsul Hasan says the three cricketers accused of spot-fixing should receive life bans from cricket if found guilty.
Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir are being probed by police and the International Cricket Council (ICC).
“If the News of the World evidence is correct, then I would banish them from cricket,” Hasan told BBC Radio 5 live…

This guy has had a sting before:

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

Osman Samiuddin:

Pakistan match-fixing claims highlight cracks in the class divide

Cricket has drawn Pakistani society together but now shows apparently disparate elements are more similar than people think

Democracy comes and goes in Pakistan, but to the country’s cricket it came after the 1978‑79 series against India and, in all its imperfections, it has since stayed. Of the three players at the centre of the spot-fixing allegations, Mohammad Amir and Mohammad Asif are breathing – and were once exhilarating – proof.
Before that India series – more a countrywide party – the Pakistan side was a closed boys’ club, essentially a side from Lahore and Karachi; 38 of the 49 Test cricketers born in Pakistan (as opposed to the 30 born in pre-partition India) who played for Pakistan until then came from those two cities. Cricket was an urban game, given to attracting dandy college boys.
That contest, which Pakistan won, was watched and followed by millions around the land. Television, new to cricket broadcasting, did its thing and took it further; radio, dying out, had already done what it could. Superstars such as Imran Khan and Javed Miandad were emerging; India was the opponent, but more the enemy: the two had fought a war eight years earlier and not played for 18; money and sponsors were waking up. These were the sparks that lit a revolution.
After that series, cricket opened itself up fully to the country; 121 Test cricketers have come since but just under half from the two cities. More and more they have come from all over Punjab, the most populous province, and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa in the north-west. The city boy with access to a good college and some money is nearly gone, replaced by many Amirs and Asifs, who come from villages with pretensions of being small towns.
They are not as educated as the players who went before and, even if they were, consider that the public education system ceased producing quality long ago. Asif and Amir, like many others before them, landed up in the big time without connections, without any push and no money, nothing but their skill. That talent was spotted in a system, no matter how decrepit, but a system nonetheless. Both have since made a life for themselves in the big city; if that is not one by-product of democracy, the spotting and rewarding of merit, then what is? This is cricket as the one equaliser in a land of vast disparity.
The standard tale is that they come into more money than their families have seen in a lifetime – and quickly, too. They have more power than players of the past ever did; the modern board administrator is a clown, the modern player a public hero. They have more people watching them. They now need to bling it up. A fancy car, or three, is bought, a big house, maybe one for the family as well, who are also brought to the city. Other celebrities multiply around them. A girl, or three, appears on the scene. Suits are at them, wanting to put their faces up in brighter lights. Entire entourages grow around them, of extended families and drop-out friends, who have to be fed, clothed, kept and entertained. Muhammad Ali knew about them a long time ago.
These are not unique stories. They are everywhere; ghetto basketballers, working-class footballers, slum-town cricketers. Maybe cricket, currently trying to work out how much money it can make for itself, brings its own context. Money-making has become too serious a business in this business for it to be steered by transparency and accountability.
Perhaps Pakistan brings its own context, too. The impermanency of life here breeds a peculiar hoard mentality: get in quick, get rich quicker because you never know when you will be out forever, from a job, from politics, from a team. Over the past 10 years particularly, rampant consumerism has eaten away at urban Pakistan, which has long been sweet on ostentation in any case. Just having wealth is not enough. Showing people you have it is more important.
Moreover, gambling, even though illegal, is fine by most people. It is, some will argue, ingrained to an extent. A friend conducted a focus group of boys and young men recently on cricket and was shocked to learn that they were happily taking and placing bets on street matches.
And the Pakistan Cricket Board cannot be relied upon to handle an email, so handling the life and career of a boy is out of the question. They will not protect them from anyone; if fans, journalists, politicians and bookies want a piece of a player, the PCB do not get in the way. Neither have players here ever helped themselves; thrice efforts have been made to form a players’ association and thrice they have failed. It is the strongest indictment of a culture where every one is out for himself.
Nobody is there to warn young players of the ways of this new world they inhabit, because stardom in Pakistan really is the loneliest pursuit. And maybe it is not even as much about the rural-urban shift as much as it is a class shift, from making money to live to making money for money’s sake. Their place in life, in the grand unwieldy scheme of society, shifts visibly and firmly.
Yet too much can be made of their condition and too little of individual greed. Cricketers have come from places much smaller than Asif and Amir, from poorer backgrounds, and gone through entire lives – let alone a career – without a scandal to stain them.
Pakistan’s players do not get paid as much as counterparts around the world, it is being said. This is true. They have also missed out on the life-changing riches of the Indian Premier League. But at 250,000 rupees (£1,900), 175,000 rupees and 100,000 rupees per month in the three grades of the PCB’s central contracts, they are not paid peanuts. They live in Pakistan, not India, Australia or England, and in this country that kind of salary is seen by very, very few.
Add on match fees – roughly the same again as the monthly retainer – and on‑tour fees, board and personal endorsements, salaries from their first-class sides (which are run by organisations such as banks, airlines and power companies, offering the option of a stable, secure job after retirement), deals with counties and league clubs and now Twenty20 domestic sides, and most elite players really are kings of this land.
This is why the alleged leadership of Salman Butt is the most difficult aspect to grasp. Amir’s errors can too easily be explained by his youth and his background, and Asif has previous, having failed a drug test. But Butt? Whenever there is talk of him it is inevitably of his English-speaking and educated ways. He is a truly urban product, to a degree polished. “He’s been brought up well,” Bob Woolmer once said of him. Had he not been a cricketer, he could have been nine-to-fiving somewhere and who knows, his floppy locks might have got him into the music gig.
Earlier in his career, on the kind of TV show meant to humanise celebrity, he was asked how he felt, as a big-city boy, fitting into a team full of small-town guys. The answer was predictably well-judged, designed to cause no offence: “It’s great, you learn about the country, its people,” and all that. Amir, Asif and Butt being in one team together is probably Pakistan cricket’s greatest democratic triumph. Arguably it is among the country’s more significant feats, for in what sphere really do men here stand together regardless of where they come from, what they speak and how much they have?
Typical, then, for such a contrary country that somehow this stands to become one of the greatest tragedies, too.

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

http://blog.dawn.com/2010/08/31/i-delivered-that-no-ball/

The misfortune of Pakistan is that its tragedy appears as farce.
Over the past few years, our screens have been awash with images both gruesome and depressing in equal measures. And they have been punctually followed by television anchors and television politicians blaming India, Israel, CIA, NASA and any other bogeyman you can think of – as long as the perpetrators weren’t one of us.
Each time, amidst the despondency, I would find myself laughing at such incredulous claims. When, I would wonder, will such people face up to the brazen facts?

Over the past 48 hours, one of the greatest passions of my life has witnessed a sickening turn of events.
And since then, people have asked one of Pakistan’s largest religious communities – the cricket-fans – when will you face up to the facts?

After Bangalore 1996, Lord’s 1999, after the Qayyum Report and the player revolts, after everything that has happened, how could we still be shocked?

After all, for the most part, the players have always been corrupt, the board has always been dysfunctional, the system has been abused to the point where it is nothing but abusive – how did we not see this coming?
As I asked myself this question, I realised I was no better than those TV hosts and politicians I mocked – just like them I had always found someone else to blame.

It’s the unfair pay-cheques, the IPL bans, the lack of education, the War on Terror, the colonial prejudices.
So I decided to blame the greedy players, the short-sighted administrators, the extractive system.
But love has this way of denuding you and your rationalisations. And my love of cricket asked me – when will you blame yourself?

Myself? How am I to blame?

I whizz past red lights while forwarding a text about the laws broken by the government.

I feast myself silly on all-you-can-eat-buffets, and yet I cringe at the greed of those boys.

I glower at my sister’s slipping dupatta as I leave for a night out, and still its the hypocrisy of Amir’s sajda at Lord’s that rankles me.

I shame Hollywood celebrities for their apathy towards the floods, when no amount of disasters slices me as much as a bunch of young men dropping some catches.

I curse the bus-driver when his swerving makes me miss my turn for the mosque.

I am someone who is in denial of the wrongs I commit.

I must be someone who is the change I wish to see.

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

…Speaking in the same vein, Harbhajan Singh on Sunday said he has never been approached by a bookie in his career and would slap anybody who dares to approach him to fix games…](http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100906/jsp/sports/story_12901715.jsp)

Now I know what Srisanth said to Harbhajan to get a slap on the face!

Re: Arrest Over Cricket 'Match-Fixing' At Lords

haha bhajji is such a joker

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

**SECOND spot-fixing probe into Pakistanis but Mohammad Aamer told he can avoid life ban
**

Mohammad Aamer will be told he could avoid a life ban if he gives evidence against his team-mates in the Lord’s inquiry

Two Pakistan cricketers have been ordered to hand over their mobile telephone records as it emerged they are the subject of a SECOND investigation into spot-fixing.

Sportsmail has learned that wicketkeeper Kamran Akmal and suspended captain Salman Butt were contacted by cricket’s ruling body, the ICC, after suspicions arose during the Asia Cup.

The ICC Anti-Corruption Unit have demanded they release details of their telephone activity during the summer tournament in Sri Lanka. They expect the full cooperation of both players but have yet to receive a response from the Pakistan camp.

The demand came in a letter, dated August 21, which was sent to the two players before details of the News of the World expose surrounding the no-ball scandal at the Lord’s Test against England.

Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Aamer have been banned by the ICC pending the investigation into that scandal and could face life bans, if found guilty, but Akmal is due to face England at Cardiff in a Twenty20 international on Tuesday. Pakistan officials refused to be drawn on the latest revelations last night.

The news will dismay the England players and the ECB, who made it clear to the Pakistan board and the ICC last week that they were not prepared to play Pakistan in the current limited-overs series if the players accused of corruption were still in the opposing line-up.

Butt, Asif and Aamer are still under investigation by the Metropolitan Police over the Lord’s matter but are unlikely to face criminal charges.

Instead they will face heavy punishment from the game’s governing body if they are found guilty by an independent panel of manipulating the Lord’s Test by Asif and Aamer bowling deliberate no balls at the instigation of Butt.

The ICC are investigating Australia’s victory over Pakistan in the Sydney Test in January but they are satisfied the match was not fixed. Their probe centres on what Sir Ronnie Flanagan, head of the ICC’s Anti-Corruption Unit, calls a ‘dysfunctional tour’.

Sportsmail understands the ICC believe some players might have underperformed in that Test but they did so because they were in dispute with captain Mohammad Yousuf.

Aamer, 18, will be told he could avoid a life ban if he gives evidence against his team-mates in the Lord’s inquiry.

Shafqat Rana, the Pakistan associate manager, last night said of the latest investigation: ‘You will have to ask the ICC or the players themselves.’

The three players’ agent is Mazhar Majeed, named as ‘the fixer’ by the News of the World.

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

Raging storm! Scandals, probes … and now Pakistan can’t even practise

Rain lashed down on Cardiff on Monday as Pakistan tried in vain to practise ahead of the Twenty20 international against England while the clouds hanging over a discredited tour showed no signs of dispersing.

Pakistan will learn on Tuesday that far from being able to move on after the suspensions of the three players accused of spot-fixing in the Lord’s Test, they face further turmoil in the form of another investigation into a fourth member of their side.

Kamran Akmal has attracted attention for his incompetent wicketkeeping both on Pakistan’s tour of Australia and in the first Test against England at Trent Bridge. Now he is under investigation by the ICC for alleged spot-fixing during the Asia Cup one-day tournament earlier this year.

Under investigation: Kamran Akmal (centre)

It is another huge blow for Pakistan as they attempt to draw a line under a strife-riven tour and slowly start to build a better future under an unlikely saviour in one-day captain Shahid Afridi.

Afridi has clashed with authority repeatedly in a chequered career but he has never been accused of spot or match-fixing and seems to be relishing his new role in trying to bring stability and credibility to a team in disarray.

Afridi, who resigned as Test captain after Pakistan’s 150-run defeat by Australia at Lord’s earlier this summer, was making all the right noises again on Monday, pledging his support for any attempt to clean up his besieged side and suggesting that Pakistan should once again turn to the experience of either Mohammad Yousuf or Younis Khan to replace Salman Butt as Test captain.

Afridi said that news from Islamabad that the Pakistan government are to investigate the assets of both past and present players was a ‘good thing because it will help take away the stain of corruption from us’.

The Federal Bureau of Revenue in Pakistan will collect details of bank accounts, other assets and the number of cars their players own as they attempt to discover whether they are the result of ill-gotten gains.
It was news that was also welcomed by Pakistan’s hierarchy in the form of associate manager Shafqat Rana. ‘I think this is a good thing from the Pakistan government,’ he said. ‘It was in their mind before we came over. It will open things out so that the players will be very careful.’

And such is the desire for this Pakistan team to be perceived as clean that Rana even suggested that there should be no leniency shown towards Mohammad Aamer should he be found guilty of corruption.

There is a growing feeling within the game that the brilliant 18-year-old should be treated more sympathetically than his colleagues because of his age and impressionability but Rana said: ‘I think it should be the same with everybody if he breaks the law. It doesn’t matter how old he is. Cricket fans in Pakistan want everything in the best spirit of the game.’

The rain stayed away when England practised at the Swalec Stadium on Monday morning before the mood in the home camp was emphasised by Stuart Broad, who pointed out that so much information and education is given to players on corruption these days that there can be ‘no excuses’ for anyone who strays.

'There’s an anti-corruption guy round the changing rooms all the time so I don’t think any player could ever have an excuse like “I didn’t know” or “We weren’t educated”, said Broad.

'We get handouts, handbooks. The amount of books I’ve got from the ICC at home, full of information - there’s certainly no excuse as players.

‘Every year you get reminded and get bullet points of what to do and what not to do. The ECB are pretty strict in regulating everything like that. We’re lucky with the board we’ve got.’

And Broad said that England had ‘no sympathy’ for the plight Pakistan find themselves in and just want to win the second Twenty20 international.

They will have even less when they discover that one of their opponents has questions to answer, according to the ICC.

Teams:

England (from): Collingwood (capt), Kieswetter, Davies (wkt), Bopara, Morgan, Wright, Bresnan, Broad, Swann, Yardy, Sidebottom, Anderson, Shahzad.

Pakistan (from): S Afridi (capt), S Hasan, F Alam, M Yousuf, U Akmal, K Akmal (wkt), A Razzaq, U Gul, S Ajmal, S Akhtar, W Riaz, M Hafeez, A Ali.

Umpires: I Gould, R Illingworth. Third umpire: R Kettleborough. Match referee: J Crowe.

TV: Sky Sports 1 from 5.30pm (starts 6pm).

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

**STUART BROAD has no sympathy for Pakistan’s scandal-hit team and insists there are no excuses for match-fixing.
**
The England all-rounder yesterday outlined in detail the anti-corruption advice given to ALL international cricketers.

He declared: “I don’t think any player could ever have an excuse such as ‘I didn’t know’ or ‘We weren’t educated’. We’re very educated on all the anti-corruption stuff.”

Broad spoke out as cricket tried to return to near-normal after Pakistan trio Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir were charged by the ICC over the spot-fixing scandal.

Twenty20 world champions England beat the tourists by five wickets in Cardiff on Sunday, with the second match at the same venue tonight.

While England have kept their distance from the row, Broad revealed players are regularly warned about the perils of corruption.

All players and backroom staff receive a power-point presentation from the ICC and are given handbooks and DVDs.

There are frequent refreshers and each person must sign a document to confirm they fully understand the implications.

Broad, 24, explained: "There’s an anti-corruption guy around the changing rooms all the time. I have lots of books from the ICC at home, full of information about what you can and cannot do.

“It’s not all reading. We are shown DVDs that are very watchable. They are so clear that they take you back to when you were five or six. There is no excuse.”

Broad added: "Do I have sympathy for Pakistan? No. As cricketers, we have one job and that is to perform on the pitch.

"There are always distractions in international cricket — and more than normal this week — but as players we have to be able to shut things out.

"I’m sure all the hype around Pakistan is tough, but that’s not our problem.

“We’re not treating their players any differently. We hear of these allegations but have to get on and play our cricket.”

Eyebrows were raised on Sunday when Shoaib Akhtar spilled a comically-easy chance to reprieve Eoin Morgan on 13. He probably dropped the game.

Broad added: "My thought was ‘Brilliant — Morgs is still in!’ That drop gave us a great chance to win. From the outside, I’m sure people will look on it with suspicion but we don’t think like that at all.

“We are so focused on technique, skills and what each ball is doing. Sometimes, we don’t even notice the crowd.”

Broad also says he has no plans to join the Twitter craze popular among his team-mates — because he is too lazy.

He added: "It’s laziness and what would I post? Graeme Swann’s character comes over well with his jokes and he and Jimmy Anderson have embraced the twitter thing.

“But if you write something a little controversial, it’s going to make headlines.”

Meanwhile, former Pakistan captain Imran Khan blames shambolic administration for his national team’s crisis.

Imran, 57, said: "Cricket is run on an ad-hoc basis and you can imagine how ad hoc when the Pakistan president, who would normally know zero about cricket, appoints the chairman of the cricket board.

"What you’re seeing now is the shambles that is called our cricket board and it’s reflected in the haphazard team selection and the team’s discipline.

“Anyone found guilty of match-fixing should be banned for life. If these boys are guilty, it will open a Pandora’s box.”

Re: Arrest Over Cricket 'Match-Fixing' At Lords

He is told or will be told????


I doubt our team management comprising of incompetent Wajid Hasan (though he is "HC"), Ijazzzz Butt will let Aamer speak the truth.

Re: Arrest Over Cricket 'Match-Fixing' At Lords

that is akin to blackmailing Aamer

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

Ijaz Butt hides from crisis - Geoff Lawson

Geoff Lawson, the former Australian fast bowler and Pakistan coach, has criticised the PCB and its chairman, Ijaz Butt, for failing to provide the strong leadership that the country needs during one of its biggest challenges. Lawson said Pakistan had put in place terrific 10 to 15-year plans to develop the game from the grassroots up, but since the appointment of Butt in 2008 there has been a decline with the PCB becoming virtually “non-functioning”.
“Even through this crisis we have heard virtually nothing from their chairman,” Lawson said on ESPNcricinfo’s audio show Time Out. “He hides from a crisis, he is not a leader and when Pakistan need a strong leader and people to show them the way forward, they are not getting it from their board.”
Test captain Salman Butt and fast bowlers Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir were charged under the ICC’s anti-corruption code and provisionally suspended from the game while their case is being heard. However, Lawson said Salman Butt had done a great job with a young side since being appointed captain of Pakistan and that he would be shocked if Butt turned out to be at the center of the spot-fixing scandal.
“If it is the case that these young players are being affected, then there is something very bad with the environment in which Pakistan cricket is being played in.”
Given the stakes, Lawson said the current crisis is the greatest Pakistan cricket has faced, and unlike previous crises, the team will not have the opportunity to mend fences by playing matches at home once things calm down.
“The hearings on Asif, Amir and Salman will be extremely important,” he said. “I hope against hope that things will turn out alright but this is very much a watershed for Pakistan cricket right now.”

http://www.cricinfo.com/england-v-pakistan-2010/content/current/story/476015.html

Re: Arrest Over Cricket 'Match-Fixing' At Lords

Lawson for president!!!

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

Two Pakistan players issued notices before scandal

Two Pakistan cricketers were issued notices by the ICC seeking information nearly a month before the spot-fixing scandal broke during the Lord’s Test last month, ESPNcricinfo has learned. The players are part of the squad in England and were sent notices because they were already under the scanner of the ICC’s Anti Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU). One of them was provisionally suspended by the ICC after being named by News of the World’s sting operation.

The ACSU “had already served notices seeking information from certain players even before the scam broke out,” a source familiar with the ongoing investigation told ESPNcricinfo. It is also understood that relevant PCB officials were aware of the notices, which were sent immediately after the first Test in Nottingham.

ESPNcricinfo was unable to contact PCB chairman Ijaz Butt, who has not made any statements since Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir were suspended by the ICC. Yawar Saeed, the Pakistan team’s manager, is not authorised to speak on the investigations and referred ESPNcricinfo to the chairman. Another official refused to confirm or deny that such notices had been received.

Although the Daily Mail has today named the two cricketers, there has been no official confirmation of their identities.

The notice served to the pair sought certain information and the players were required to respond within 14 days. Failure to do so would in itself constitute an offence under the ICC’s anti-corruption code.

Some of Pakistan’s cricketers are facing scrutiny not only from the ACSU but also from Pakistan’s tax authorities who will reportedly probe the finances of the cricketers, a move endorsed by both Shafqat Rana, Pakistan’s associate manager, and limited-overs captain Shahid Afridi. “It was there in their (the government’s) mind before we came over,” Rana said about the tax probe. “I think it’s a good thing, it will open things out so they (the players) will be very careful.”

http://www.cricinfo.com/england-v-pakistan-2010/content/current/story/476039.html

They were already under the radar and still going at it… thats a bit dumb :konfused:

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords


Pakistan corruption scandal no surprise: Boycott

Former England captain Geoff Boycott said Monday that Pakistani cricket was repeatedly implicated in corruption scandals because authorities had not clamped down hard enough in the past.

The no-nonsense Yorkshireman said the International Cricket Council (ICC) had failed to tackle past cases adequately, allowing the current climate to develop.

Three Pakistan players — Test captain Salman Butt and bowlers Mohammad Aamer and Mohammad Asif — have been suspended and charged by the ICC’s Anti-Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU), over the alleged bowling of deliberate no-balls at Lord’s cricket ground in north London.

“It is no coincidence that Pakistan are repeatedly implicated in these scandals because they never deal with them properly,” Boycott wrote in The Daily Telegraph newspaper.

“People might get suspended or banished from the team, but within a few months the regime changes, and they are back again, as if nothing happened.

“Pakistan must join the rest of the world in deploring what happened at Lords. There is no point them trying to turn a blind eye.”

He urged the ACSU to offer rising star Aamer a plea bargain, “because it is so crucial for cricket”.

“Tell the truth about what took place and he can get off with a lighter sentence. If he won’t play ball, then make an example of him,” he wrote.

“I feel for Aamer, because any 18-year-old is likely to get dragged along by his seniors. But I still believe that he deserves a lengthy ban — seven years, perhaps — if he is shown to have bowled no-balls to order.

“As for the others, they should be treated even more harshly, because they have no excuse.”

He said while some experts say what is alleged to have happened might not have been a crime under English law, “it looks like a crime against cricket”.

He also urged Pakistan’s ambassador to London to “get off his high horse”, saying that if he was 100 per cent convinced of the players’ innocence, he was not looking at the evidence.

“The evidence looks so bad that, whatever the police make of this case, the ACSU will be under pressure to take strong action,” the former batsman said.

**“Within the disciplinary hearings, the burden of proof might as well be reversed: it is up to the players to prove themselves innocent.” ****He said if the ACSU did not take the case seriously, it should hand it over to a panel of former players. **“I can promise you, we wouldn’t mess about.”


http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/cricket/08-pakistan-corruption-scandal-no-surprise-boycott-ts-02

Re: Arrest Over Cricket ‘Match-Fixing’ At Lords

Seems like dawn decided to leave out quite a bit from the original article

But I will tell you this – what they did looks like a crime against cricket. And if there is no firm response from the Anti-Corruption and Security Unit, we might as well disband it.

		  As for the Pakistan High Commissioner, he should get off his high horse.    Spot-fixing cannot be condoned. There is no conspiracy against Pakistan    here, and by claiming that he is "100 per cent convinced" that the    players are innocent, he is not looking at the evidence. 

I am particularly concerned about the size of the no-balls sent down by Mohammad Amir. Professional cricketers play the game within small fractions. It is hard to see how he could have run up and bowled a no-ball by 12 inches without realising he is going to overstep. In normal circumstances, he would know at least two strides before he gets to the crease, and would abort his run-up.

As for the captain, he is the person who decides who will bowl the next over. So if the fixer is saying “the third ball of the first over”, the bowler can’t do it without having the captain onside. The evidence looks so bad that, whatever the police make of this case, the ACSU will be under pressure to take strong action. Within the disciplinary hearings, the burden of proof might as well be reversed: it is up to the players to prove themselves innocent.

Because it is so crucial for cricket, I think the ACSU should offer Mohammed Amir a plea bargain. Tell us the truth about what took place and he can get off with a lighter sentence. If he won’t play ball, then make an example of him. I feel for Amir, because any 18-year-old is likely to get dragged along by his seniors. But I still believe that he deserves a lengthy ban – seven years, perhaps – if he is shown to have bowled no-balls to order. As for the others, they should be treated even more harshly, because they have no excuse.

It is no coincidence that Pakistan are repeatedly implicated in these scandals, because they never deal with them properly. People might get suspended or banished from the team, but within a few months the regime changes, and they are back again, as if nothing had happened.
We saw a typical example with Mohammad Yousuf on this very tour. I am not saying that he was kicked out for match-fixing – we don’t really know – but that the to-ing and fro-ing was typical of Pakistan cricket. One minute he’s in disgrace, the next he’s on the field.

Now look at the Indians and their response to the revelations surrounding the Hansie Cronjé affair 10 years ago. Mohammad Azharuddin and Manoj Prabhakar were among the players implicated. They were never convicted in a criminal case, but the Indian board was strong. They never played for India again, nor did Ajay Jadeja, even though his ban was quashed in 2003. The selectors cannot be forced to pick people they don’t want to pick. Having these sort of players in your dressing-room can damage the team’s morale, as well as its credibility.

Pakistan must join the rest of the cricket world in deploring what happened at Lord’s. There is no point them trying to turn a blind eye.

The PCB has been treated with a lot of sympathy since the terrorist attacks, just over 18 months ago, which meant that they were unable to host international cricket. But that will dry up very quickly if they fail to address what has been going on. No one will want to host their matches.

Shakespeare wrote that Caesar’s wife must be above reproach. The same must be true of cricket. And that means dealing harshly with anyone who casts a shadow on it. If the ACSU aren’t prepared to take this case seriously, they should hand this case over to the former players – people like myself, Ian Botham and Michael Holding, who played tough, competitive cricket throughout our careers. I can promise you, we wouldn’t mess about.

Re: Arrest Over Cricket 'Match-Fixing' At Lords

Exactly what I have been saying !!!

5-7 yrs ban for Amir. Life for the rest.

Amir will be 23-25 when he can come back. He can still play for another 10 years.