Are we naturally bad?...Do we need to be controlled?...

Re: Are we naturally bad?...Do we need to be controlled?...

Aly-Sam: Interesting point about babies. You said they confirm to nature, which is logical reasoning. However, assuming babies are all good is not logical. If you observe babies they have plenty of "evil" characteristics. If you watch babies closely, they are selfish, jealous, impulsive, devious etc. We love them because of our programming and that allow us to bear their, at times, obnoxious behavior. I think your reasoning that we are born good but change to bad with our upbringing may not be correct. I think we are born with these "evil (natural)" qualities and then our upbringing tames us to the levels of our societies.

Re: Are we naturally bad?...Do we need to be controlled?...

no one needs to be controlled and controlling itself is not the best
work to get busy with. it has its own negative impact on the controller
- be it the woman or the man, case being a relationship between a woman and a man.
this relationship building is a SACRED deed, which culminates into a marriage.
the contract of this deed has its clear clauses to abide by, which don’t apply to one side, only, but
to BOTH.
issue is not gender focused insight into badness or goodness.
we can all bad and we also have the potential to be good.
the water shed situations in life, where you are left no space, where
your personal right to be, just be your self, is expected to be taken
away from you, and when you are being nailed down for being different,
when you have unfairness staring you in the face, then, something must
be done, in good faith.

babies are the most vulnerable of all creation, next to elderly.
humans must take care of the evilhood, by not letting anyone undergo situations and treatments that rattle the evil ness.

Re: Are we naturally bad?...Do we need to be controlled?...

Thanks parissenoor.

You said that you were raised in a moral family. Hence, the question arises you being good is a choice or a consequence? Which bears out more weight later? At times the consequences makes us assume that we are making a choice, however, we are not. For you doing something against your upbringing is not a choice; you simply cannot do that.

Re: Are we naturally bad?...Do we need to be controlled?...

When I say conform to nature...well think about it also in view of your own post concerning animals. We all have defence mechanisms....ie when baby takes away her toys instead of sharing with others, baby gets possessive over mother etc. This is nature and the way nature has provided us with protection. This is not evil charachteristic. We do have all types of personality traits in us and they will blossom as we grow up...so upbringing, education, environment all play major roles in who we will become. When baby cries it now depends on how mother/caregiver gives the correct type of attention. This will determine whether baby will develop charachteristics that will make it secure, insecure, brattish, immature, mature, selfish, possessive and all these can carry on later in life.

Re: Are we naturally bad?...Do we need to be controlled?...

Exactly...the people who do not fear to commit crimes generally have nothing to lose. This was exactly what I was thinking. So its really not whether they are (born) good or bad, but the circumstances that have made them feel they can do anything and not lose much but gain a lot.

I think we can only change peoples attitudes if we dont let them feel that they were born "bad"

Re: Are we naturally bad?...Do we need to be controlled?...

Circumstances are definitely the main factor in determining how one acts...And i wadnt suggesting that there are individuals who are born bad...i was suggesting that it is in everyones nature to be bad...Its just your circumstances determine how you deal with your nature...