Re: ____ Are u with the $y$tem, OR against it? ____
It would be argued that the real inqilabi is Nawaz Sharif as he was removed twice by status quo forces and again an attempt was made for the third time, so he must be doing something right if he upsets the status quo forces.
Re: ____ Are u with the $y$tem, OR against it? ____
The system has failed balochistan, fata and interior Sindh. It definitely needs overhauling, the present system is not working. We need to ask us though, how will it be reformed? Does it suit PMLN and PPP to reform it?
Re: ____ Are u with the $y$tem, OR against it? ____
It would be argued that the real inqilabi is Nawaz Sharif as he was removed twice by status quo forces and again an attempt was made for the third time, so he must be doing something right if he upsets the status quo forces.
You are understanding America here, don't forget the war in Afghanistan is still ongoing and Imran has been publicly speaking against it.
Re: ____ Are u with the $y$tem, OR against it? ____
The current system is designed to protect the ruling elite that has been taking turns (PPP, PMLN, PMLQ, Military). The only solution is to have a council of 50 brilliant minds (clean technocrats, business professionals, educationists and philanthropists) that run the country under a direct elected or elected by council president. These folks do land reforms and impose an education emergency in the country for minimum of 10 years and make it mandatory for every child to get atleast grade 10 or 12 education. Increase education budget by 10 times during this period. Have an independent NAB who brings all looted money in Pakistan and prosecute all politicians, bureaucrats and military.
Sounds like a fairy tale, but other nations did it, why we can't.
Re: ____ Are u with the $y$tem, OR against it? ____
And saanp ki terha kursi per phun phela ler beth jata…like all the able dictators before me.
or
you are suggesting something else, Mr. Gen. S after ousting the tyrants???
Re: ____ Are u with the $y$tem, OR against it? ____
The system has failed balochistan, fata and interior Sindh. It definitely needs overhauling, the present system is not working. We need to ask us though, how will it be reformed? Does it suit PMLN and PPP to reform it?
well u know, its like going for an over haul, led masses behind you and banging against a concrete wall... because there's no WALKTHROUGH to actually follow through.
It might be the first time but we need to start thinking out of the box.
Re: ____ Are u with the $y$tem, OR against it? ____
The current system is designed to protect the ruling elite that has been taking turns (PPP, PMLN, PMLQ, Military). The only solution is to have a council of 50 brilliant minds (clean technocrats, business professionals, educationists and philanthropists) that run the country under a direct elected or elected by council president. These folks do land reforms and impose an education emergency in the country for minimum of 10 years and make it mandatory for every child to get atleast grade 10 or 12 education. Increase education budget by 10 times during this period. Have an independent NAB who brings all looted money in Pakistan and prosecute all politicians, bureaucrats and military.
Sounds like a fairy tale, but other nations did it, why we can't.
**The current system is designed to protect the ruling elite that has been taking turns (PPP, PMLN, PMLQ, Military).
**Very right. Aam aadmi se khota changa.
and totally agree with having independent NAB...and transparency of all politicians. Any minor mishap then rebuke his ass.
Re: ____ Are u with the $y$tem, OR against it? ____
You are understanding America here, don't forget the war in Afghanistan is still ongoing and Imran has been publicly speaking against it.
Are you saying that the US would not favour IK? 3 things to note 1) biggest supporters of the US is Pak Army which is backing the 2 stooges 2) Th US has lost the war in Afghanistan and now the war will be fought through CIA and ISI and not Centcom. 3) US does not have a 3 years horizon it looks 10 and 20 years ahead so Afghanistan war is of little significance.
Re: ____ Are u with the $y$tem, OR against it? ____
Are you saying that the US would not favour IK? 3 things to note 1) biggest supporters of the US is Pak Army which is backing the 2 stooges 2) Th US has lost the war in Afghanistan and now the war will be fought through CIA and ISI and not Centcom. 3) US does not have a 3 years horizon it looks 10 and 20 years ahead so Afghanistan war is of little significance.
if the army was behind the two stooges they would have wrapped the system they don't need any ones approval. Fact of the matter being the us can deal with the two parties with which they have dealt before and those suit the army too.