CONCLUSION & THE FINAL DEATH BLOW TO THE MODERNIST CULT
This thread was arrogantly started with attacks upon the Shari’ah, by people who claim to be adherents to the Qur’an & Sunnah, who are better known as modernists. My purpose in entering this discussion was to show the futility of their claims, so the one who is sincerely searching for the truth is not deceived by their lies and deception. My evidence being from the creator that we claim to worship, Allah and the statements of the Messenger(saw) to show that what these people are uttering is disbelief. Also I took a few laws of the Shariah which at first seem discrimnatory, but when explained rationally, it showed clearly the perfect wisdom of Allah, e.g. the law of inheritance mentioned previously. The reason why the man recives more is because of his financial obligations which are much more than the woman’s. To explain each and every law of Shariah rationally and to prove the superiority over the western laws is not possible here, since it would require many volumes of work. And the scholars have already replied to these modernists, and their works are widely available.
These modernists claim that they believe in the Qur’an and Sunnah yet they failed to quote a single verse of the Qur’an or hadith in support of their claim, rather they continued to quote from the UN and western media. They stated all the Shariah laws, saying they are out of date, but failed to say why and what their alternative is. Their methodology is to be very vague since if they said that the cutting of the hand and stoning to death of the adulterer or barbaric and inferior to the western laws, they would clearly be declared unbelievers.
Allah says : “If any do fail to judge by what Allah has revealed, they are non-believers.” (S.5:v.44)
They also failed to answer any of the questions posed or issues raised with regards to their so-called humane laws, e.g. abortion, i.e. murder of un-born babies, promoted by their progressive civilisation, since they realized that trying to defend this issue would be a lost cause. Rather each time they ignored the questions posed, and simply stated more questions. The laws of the modernists are not based upon any humanatarian morales, but upon what the majority of people agree upon. So the people used to consider abortion & homosexuality something evil, but now they accept it since that’s what the majority of the people think is right. Soon the opinion of the people will be that child-molesting and rape is acceptable, these will then become the new humane laws. They also failed to reply to the following hadith quoted previously
reported by at-tirmidhee. “The Messenger(saw) recited to Adiyy bin Hatim (who was a christian before embracing Islamm) Allah’s words:
‘They (the christians and jews) have taken their rabbis and monks - as well as the Messiah, son of Mary - as lords besides Allah, although they had been commanded to worship none but the One God…’ (9:31)
Upon hearing this Adiyy responded ‘But we did not worship them’. The Messenger(saw) asked him 'Did they not make lawful for you that which Allah had prohibited, and you (obeyed them and) took it as lawful? And (did they not) make prohibited for you that which is permissible, and you (obeyed them and) accepted it as prohibited? He replied ‘Yes! indeed’ The Messenger(saw) concluded ‘This then is worshipping them.’”:
This hadith applies directly to these modernists, since they are trying to make lawful that which Allah has made lawful. Watch them make a claim that they are not trying to make anything lawful which is unlawful but only ‘changing’ the Shariah.
They use vague terms without defining them. Modernists use terms like democracy, freedom, and equality, but they do not define what they mean by them. The danger in using vague terms is that a knowledgeable person will pass over the word or concept, thinking they meant the Islamic or acceptable definition while in fact they did not, while others may believe what they are saying is true. Neither they present all of the relevant information that is available on the subject. That is, from Qur’an, sunna, etc. They only present that which will support their views. This tactic is used to avoid unliked beliefs, so they just do not mention them.
They say Ribaa/Interest is correct since the entire financial system is based upon it today, however Allah says (s.2 v. 278): “O you who believe, fear Allah and leave what comes from Riba if you are believers. If you do not do so, then wait for a war from Allah and His Messenger.”
It is required of every Muslim that he listens to the Words of Allah when it is recited and to the Ahadeeth of the Prophet, Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam, when it is narrated. The Muslim must understand when he listens and reflect upon what the orders require of him or her. He or she must then respond by carrying out the orders, otherwise it will be an argument against him or her on the Day of Judgment. Allah says in S. Al Mu’minoon where it states
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/frown.gif
23:105)
“Were not My Verses recited to you, and then you used to deny them?”
And they try to make such a distinction between the Quraan which they accept is for eternity and the Shariah which they say is not as though Allah has ordered us to leave the Quraan on our top shelves and go to the UN/USA on how to live our lives and conduct our day-to-day business.
So this was just a brief description of the reality of the modernist cult and how the devil has deceived them so much. Again, these people will fail to reply to the above proofs quoted about their disbelief but rather respond with something on the lines of “that was all for sound effects, wasn’t it.” just like in the story of Ibraheem(as) mentioned previously.
When Ibraheem(as) went to Namrood and said to him, "It is my Lord who gives life and death. He(Namrood) said “I give life and cause death.”
So the stupid tyrant said that he too could give life and death - meaning that he killed whom he pleased and spared whom he pleased. This answer of his was merely a pretence and a means of fooling the ignorant and was a way of avoiding the question, since what Ibraheem referred to was the fact that his Lord created mankind, animals and plants and gave them life and brought them into existence from nothing. So when Ibraheem(as) saw that he tried to create a pretence to evade the issue, which might fool some of the ignorant and common folk, he then said, as a means of showing the futility of what his saying entailed, that if you are as you claim, then
“Allah causes the sun to rise from the east, so if you are truthful then cause it to rise from the west. So the unbeliever was dumbfounded.”
So the unbeliever was left dumbfounded and at loss for words. His argument was overthrown, he was silenced, struck dumb and falsehood was rendered futile as is alway the case.