I've noticed that the guppans don't blindly support female posters when they create threads about in-laws issues. They will point out where she's wrong.......and you can see examples of that in several threads. For example, Nadz's threads...or the recent one about giving engagement gifts. But there are a few single male posters......and I dunno if it's due to a language barrier that impedes their comprehension and communication........who not only make unreasonable generalizations but their advice reflects an imbalance in accountability.
Hmm, I dunno Sara. I don't think that just one male member would hold all the views that Deeba has mentioned in her original post. Seems to me that the post is talking about several members who hold one ore more of the views listed.
I've noticed that the guppans don't blindly support female posters when they create threads about in-laws issues. They will point out where she's wrong.......and you can see examples of that in several threads. For example, Nadz's threads...or the recent one about giving engagement gifts. ** But there are a few single male posters......and I dunno if it's due to a language barrier that impedes their comprehension and communication........who not only make unreasonable generalizations but their advice reflects an imbalance in accountability.**
Agree.. I don't think it's just a language barrier tho.. There are new posters who've started threads and gotten genuinely upset at being called trolls or accused of lying by *the same little group of posters who will *always blame the girl whatever the situation.. *Sara, what I wrote in my first post could apply to more than one person which Reha and a few others also noticed.. *
**
indeed there are such guys but there are also some single guys on here that have a balanced view i can think of shak, naabigh, xtron, T1000 those are the only ones i can think of for now but yeah its not like all the single guys here have an unbalanced view granted some do
I am glad you started this thread. This misogynistic behavior is so immature and is not going to serve them well when they get married. I hope with this thread, they can correct it before it's too late...
IMO It's the guys who have never actually interacted with a woman except maybe the women at home who presumably their dads have on a tight leash.
I agree with OldSpiceKomodo, how could any normal person survive if the guy you marry turns out to be an under cover crazy sexist? shudders
in order to state that this person consistently posts the same way, you would have to read all of his/her posts. (still that does not make you know about that person)
only after reading few posts of mine you claim you know what kind of person i am (but you have no clue about me frankly). go read my 400 posts first then you will have some sort of opinion about me and my character.
this is why i say again one cannot pass comments/judgements just by reading few posts
lol
It's hardly radical.. If someone consistently posts in the same way attacking women it's fairly easy to see what they're like.. As RV pointed out there are exceptions such as Mirch, Icesoul, Xtron etc. who are objective and varied in their answers according to the situation whilst a number of other male posters will pretty much always push the same sort of viewpoint..
Not surprising that someone like you who wrote that a desi woman can't survive without a husband (despite a lot of us actually having seen otherwise) has issues with this thread.. Case in point..
