^ I don’t necessarily agree Pak-one... partly owing to my own experience during/after my MBA. I got my MBA from what is generally considered a tier-2 school due to two reasons:
i) The concentration I was interested in was fairly new and only offered at this one school at the time ;
ii) The two tier-1 schools I got into were out of my reach despite the scholarships that were offered to me, and I was planning to self-finance my education through full-time work
I already had about four years of work experience after my undergraduate degree, with multiple consulting engagements with fortune 100 companies, and the way I saw it at the time and would still contend that getting an MBA for someone like me was more than just stacking up credentials for making more money. There were other strong points in my portfolio including diverse work experience and up-to-date industry endorsed qualifications in my areas of expertise. So an MBA would add more to my existing credentials rather being the sole “wow” factor. Also, when it came to alumni networks, I found the smaller school alumni community to be more well knit, responsive, and helpful, while some of my colleagues who were at bigger/”better” schools complained of very mechanistic/generalized help that was available through their alumni services.
So, there are multiple factors that need to be considered in one’s decision about an appropriate MBA school. Not everyone’s going to want to be a CEO, not everyone’s going to have the finances to fund their degrees comfortably, not everyone is going to be in a situation where an MBA on their résumé is going to be the only high point.
Lucid, I am not doubting your reasons here, but if we return to numbers that can extrapolated over a lifetime top 20 schools are far stronger then the rest. That is not to say that you won't be able succeed without a solid MBA, the outliers discussion is a different matter altogether.
Completing an MBA for scholastic reasons is great, but it's starkly different from the vast majority of degree seekers who are looking for career advancement. A few points:
A top20 is exactly what the average person who does not want to be a CEO will need. In fact there are more F500 CEOs from lesser ranked schools than you would expect, however most senior management roles tend to go to Top20 grads. So getting a good MBA degree is more useful than not.
I don't assume that anyone has $160K + laying around, which is why the ROI becomes more important. If you're going to drop six figure, plus the lost opp costs and career advancement potential, is Wharton or School X a better bet? Most people would chose Wharton for the exit opps and the ability to pay back the student loans.
Unlike Law and Medicine, MBAs don't have to contend with additional certifications (USMLE, Bar exams) and coupled with wide availability of Business programs throughout N. America, the market is flooded with MBAs. I would contend that even a Top20 MBA isn't a guarantee for a successful career, it just allows you to be comparatively well positioned. If places like HBS and Wharton are churning out 700-800+ grads a year, one will have to go beyond the brand. However no one can deny that landing an summer internship (critical for career changers like HB) is significantly easier due to the massive recruiter access at both of the schools. What you do with the internship is up to you.
The Alumni/Career services help may be mechanistic but it gets results. Without the strong results, the Top20 would not be where they are, both in terms or rankings and alumni participation. As for strong network, not all Top20 schools are like HBS, Wharton..Places like Tuck and Cornell have the tightest yet most diverse networks that would put the big guys to shame.
In terms of high points on the resume, I would hope that the MBA even if it's from HBS is not the high point. Part of what is great about the degree is the ability to form bonds and strengthen networks, the cross pollination of ideas and perspectives. I don't make the claim that being in Top20 program will expose you to a uniformly intelligent student body, however you will find highly motivated and focused peers, which is usually a more rewarding experience. Particularly when you compare that programs where people are getting the degree solely for the credential on the resume.
That being said, I am pretty leery of the MBA degree. It's applicable to very specific subsets of people: Career changers, career advancers, and those interested in management. Many people get the degree for the wrong reasons. I have real estate agents who went to business school and add MBA to their card. To me that's a joke, as am management degree is not required for a successful career as a real estate agent. On the flip side, if you're looking to get into PE/VC schools/networks will matter a lot more.