sometimes, things are for the better, even though they seem
tricky as we are all unpredictable in human behavior, in personal
resolve to be or not to be.
the intentions are always hidden. one could be one thing now, and
something else the next split second.
if we were to initiate any connection with any animate or inanimate
object,
would it be worth its while, to even bother, since the initiating agent
is
not sure-footed?
what if, somebody is and proves to be so doubtful that you become
unsure about that agent’s motives and the whole vision for even
engaging in the first communication and what sort of vibe it leaves?
what if, there is more harm in not balancing the reason with emotions?
the parallel lines of reason and emotions, i feel, together can draw a
better picture, if pre-conditions of personal consistency, a certain
level of risk taking and belief as well as trust in the eventual
outcome to be good and win-win was more dominant than the fearful, and
frisky typifying of something or someone, merely because the agent
itself failed in registering the hypothetical from the distant-actual.
for that matter, anyone could get up or sit down and not make one
moves, since there is premeditated inertia at the last minute, or
someone purposely circumvented and created the inequality, in the first
place.
one cannot have it both ways – doubt yourself and doubt others? is
that even acceptable?
also, in the human situation, and how does this fit into the
functionality of the agent itself, if it doubts the affect and the
notion of reality that it has distorted on the basis of its own
deserting, and de-merited its own value, for now and possibly for all
times to come?