Another victory for the Namoos preservers

[ravage]

Re: Another victory for the Namoos preservers

@CM

Ravage it is pretty simple. Nobody has shown any evidence that it was a blasphemy related killing. The only one making the connection is the author of the article without any proof whatsoever.

The family member as you quoted stated that the people who may have killed him were the ones who put him in jail. They used the Blasphemy clause to put him in jail but that was not the dispute.

That is one of the main reasons why the blasphemy law is criticised. I dont know what connection you think the author is making that doesnt exist. The only connection made by the author or myself that he was accused of blasphemy, and the relevance of that is affirmed by the family of the murdered person. That there is something else behind the dispute is something I or maybe even the author is not in a position to judge, nor is it clear why that changes anything said in this thread (specifically point to a quote of mine that changes based on the fact that this was a false claim). We’re just sticking to the facts. Pretty much all high profile blasphemy cases/murders have involved defendants claiming that the claims were false.