Thanks for a positive question, but I'm afraid this may take us away from the main thread "IK and his philanthropic work".
The specific name(s) really depend on who is contesting the next election. And it is kind of early to predict that.
However I can share with you the criteria:
Must have prior experience of running a city (as a mayor), or state/province (as a CM). We have elected too many people based on their "perceived leadership" and not their actual "governance experience".
Must be a pro-development of infrastructure (roads, electricity, clean water).
Then there are other points in the criteria like his/her plans on spending taxpayers' money on education, health, and defense. Or his trends in foreign policy etc.
Hope that answers your question.
In summary - As voters we must focus on experience, pro-development agenda and not the personalities.
Hence I believe all philanthropists should be in politics. Politics is all about social development and giving people hope (schools, jobs, food, hospitals, roads, electricity) and justice and not about shamelessly clinging onto kursi and behaving like a VVIP. So how can you separate the two?