Re: Anniversary of Babri mosque demolition today
^
I'm honoured that I merited two responses.
a) You're treating an accusation like a given. I find it odd, unless there's some pragmatic structural reason to re-use foundations, why Muslims would bother to built a mosque on top of a temple. This, too, would unneccessarilly agitate the local population they were tyring to rule over. It's a myth that Muslim rule over India was absolute, or that such concerns were beyond Muslim rulers. Many had to endure alliances with Hindu kings, and such.
It may well be the case that material from destroyed temples were used to construct such mosques. This was a very common practice, and I invite you to visit Egypt/greece/turkey and you'll see this first hand.
But if this were the case, then it is even more peculiar that any temples were left standing.
b) History is beyond simple gazes. Such attitudes explain such absurdist claims.