animals and human

Hangout GupShup Cafe
1

On I was watching a documentary about wolf packs, pretty much from start you can observe which
one is going to be alpha male, which one alpha female. Nothing changes as they grow.

On other hand, Muhamad Ali, was not alpha, in fact, he started learn boxing so he could get his stolen bike back.
Jhangir Khan, had problem with his heart. Doctors did not see him having healthy life.
(2 example every one know, other wise we see it happening all around us)
Both would have been bad puppies in the litter.
Both changed it to become alpha males.

a)
So point is, do we over do instinct talk, do we over do comparison between human and animals try to explain
human behaviour ??

When clearly humans, reflect and change them self fundamentally.

b)
So can catagorize humans in 2 branches?
1-one who reflect.
2- who don’t.

2

Segmentation can be done around any attribute or set of attributes for a particular purpose, which may not be valid for other purposes.

So yes you can segment into two. Now in those who reflect, do they do it right and draw the right conclusions? And if they do, do they act on it in a timely, planned and goal oriented manner? Do they continue to reflect and refine as environment/situation changes? Because otherwise you may not see a clear differentiation between the two segments.

3

Re: animals and human

I would add two more categories to each branch

Those who control their feedback
Those who don’t