Amnesty accuses Israel of war crimes

Israel commiting War Crimes!

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - The human rights group Amnesty International has accused Israel of war crimes through what it said was the unjustified killing and maltreatment of Palestinians during an army offensive in the West Bank.

The London-based group said on Monday few of the abuses inflicted last spring had been impartially investigated.

The army reoccupied Palestinian West Bank cities with the declared aim of rooting out militants behind a campaign of Martyrdom operations that have killed scores of Israelis.

“The relationship of the conflict to the deteriorating human rights situation has led to a growing understanding that there can be no peace in the region until human rights are respected,” Amnesty International said in a 76-page report.

The report detailed what Amnesty called unlawful killings and abusive treatment of detainees in two West Bank cities where Palestinian militants put up the fiercest resistance to the army crackdown on their two-year-old uprising for statehood.

Cases described included a paralysed detainee beaten by soldiers, demolitions of homes in which a family of eight and a wheelchair-bound man died, and a woman in labour struggling to walk to hospital after troops stopped her ambulance.

Other incidents reported included released detainees forced to walk home through a battle zone, using civilians as human shields, some looting of flats, frequent blocking of ambulances and humanitarian assistance, and the destruction of religious, commercial and residential buildings without military necessity.

Amnesty has previously accused Israel of brutalising Palestinians under occupation, but in July condemned Palestinian Martyrdom operation attacks on Israeli civilians as crimes against humanity. It has denied Israeli accusations of pro-Palestinian bias.

“Amnesty believes some of the acts by the IDF (Israeli Defence Force) described (here) amount to grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention and are war crimes,” said the report, entitled: “Shielded From Scrutiny: Israeli Violations in Jenin and Nablus”.

comment: These terrorists israelis have a free hand to do what they like with approval from the biggest terrorist of them all United States Of America. And they have the nerve to call muslims terrorists.

--

In the four months between 27 February and the end of June 2002 – the period of the two major IDF offensives and the reoccupation of the West Bank - the IDF killed nearly 500 Palestinians. Although many Palestinians died during armed confrontations many of these IDF killings appeared to be unlawful and at least 16% of the victims, more than 70, were children. More than 8,000 Palestinians detained in mass round-ups over the same period were routinely subjected to ill-treatment(2) and more than 3,000 Palestinian homes were demolished.

Guess human life isnt worth it anymore....such a shame and the rest of the world ignores the news. What happened to the human rights and basic moral values? Wait that went out the window as soon as the US comes into play. And people wonder why we feel no remorse when an American or Israeli dies.

CM

what can i say apart from i agree with you!

Can the International Criminal Tribunal try the Israeli war criminals?

Long answer...i will have to write an essay. Short answer - no. The ICC can not try them.

So what? You think this will lead to anything? Coming from on side going out from the other in double speed.
It's of no use not even a dangerous criminal and killer like Sharon couldn't be set behind bars and is still leading a country like Israel, so what do you think this will lead to?

War crimes? Israel?
So, when's the next Resolution authorizing sanctions against Israel?
Or, as a good start, how about just reducing that annual $3bn in aid.

amnesty international is anti semetic ;)

So What? Amnesty International cant do s**t to Israel.

Like Amnesty and world is going to do something againts israel anytime soon.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *
War crimes? Israel?
So, when's the next Resolution authorizing sanctions against Israel?
Or, as a good start, how about just reducing that annual $3bn in aid.
[/QUOTE]

The war criminal asked for $10 billion more on his recent visit to the states. Why would any state want to give such huge amounts of economic and military aid to a state that has been widely accused of committing war crimes? Isn't it double standards and hypocrisy of the first order?

Just updating. Problem is the zionist supporters (eg. UK) are not interested in upholding international law and conventions across the board, only selectively. They have no incentive to act against the zionist entity.

"Amnesty calls for arrest of Israelis for war crimes

Chris McGreal in Jerusalem
Monday November 4, 2002
The Guardian


Amnesty says the months-long investigation is the most thorough to date and provides the spade work for war crimes trials by documenting five separate grounds for prosecution.

“If you have an army commander … who takes a holiday in a country that is a high contracting party [to the Geneva conventions] like the UK, then the UK can launch an investigation and hold a trial if it chooses. It has a legal obligation under international law to do so,” said Ms Cavanaugh. “It’s not a mystery who was in charge. The names of those responsible are known and they travel regularly to Europe and the United States.”

Among the potential candidates for prosecution is Israel’s new defence minister, Lieutenant General Shaul Mofaz, who is already under investigation by Scotland Yard. Lawyers representing Palestinian families presented a dossier of the general’s alleged crimes to the director of public prosecutions in the hope that he would be detained during a visit to the UK last week. But Gen Mofaz returned to Israel without being questioned.

Among the cases cited by Amnesty is that of Jamal Fayed, a 38-year-old severely disabled man living in Jenin refugee camp where it says 54 Palestinians were killed during the army operation in April which resulted in the destruction of the homes of about 4,000 people. Many died as the army bulldozed their houses.

“The family had shown Jamal Fayed’s ID to the soldiers who were preparing to demolish the house to prove he was paralysed and could not get out of the home without their help. The soldiers refused to help and soon after a bulldozer approached the house. The family yelled at the driver to stop. He didn’t and Jamal Fayed, still trapped inside, was killed,” the report said.

It also identifies two boys, aged six and 12, who were killed by Israeli tank fire as they went to buy sweets after the army announced that the curfew had been lifted. The military promised an investigation but, as often happens, the results are not known.

Amnesty said it has been trying to meet the Israeli government since June but without success.

Yesterday, the Israeli army said it was still studying the report and would comment later. "

Its quite obvious to any neutral observer that the IDF is implementing a policy of ethnic cleansing within the West Bank. Analysts believe that the demolition of Palestinian properties is a part of Israels long term game plan which will effectively prevent a functionable Palestinian state from being created.

Annan slams Israeli demolitions](http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,7692691%255E1702,00.html) News Interactive, Australia. 28 Oct 03

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan today condemned Israel for demolishing three Palestinian apartment blocks in the Gaza Strip which it said were used to watch Israeli troop movements. “The Secretary-General reminds the Israeli authorities that house demolitions amount to collective punishment, which is a clear violation of international humanitarian law,” his spokesman, Fred Eckhard, said.

“During the past month, some 200 buildings in the Gaza Strip were destroyed, rendering more than 2000 people homeless. In this connection, he deplores the destruction by the Israeli military of three 13-storey buildings in the Gaza Strip on Saturday night,” Eckhard said. “He strongly urges Israel to cease and desist immediately from all actions, such as continued settlement activity and the so-called security fence, that make that outcome more difficult by creating unilateral facts on the ground.”

Just like the war crimes of the Nazi’s, the world must never be allowed to forget the war crimes that are being committed by the Zionists.

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Malik73: *Just like the war crimes of the Nazi's, the world must never be allowed to forget the war crimes that are being committed by the Zionists.
[/QUOTE]
For decades Palestinians have suffered from the brutalities of one of the most totalitarian occupation force in the world. Israel has subjugated the Palestinians, it has treated them like 3rd class citizens in their own lands, it has denied them basic human rights, it has destroyed **thousands
* of Palestinian properties which are on Palestinian lands, it has killed or injured thousands of Palestinian civilians.. The question that everyone is asking is, will UN Resolutions ever be implemented against Israel ? With the US veto over such issues it seems it will never happen which can only be a disaster for humanity.

“The repeated practice by the Israeli army of deliberate and wanton destruction of homes and civilian property is a grave violation of international human rights and humanitarian law, notably of Articles 33 and 53 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and constitutes a war crime,”

Amnesty International Press Release 13 October 2003

Israel/Occupied Territories: Wanton destruction constitutes a war crime
Amnesty International condemns in the strongest terms the large-scale destruction by the Israeli army of Palestinian homes in a refugee camp in the southern Gaza Strip town of Rafah, which made homeless hundreds of people, including many children and elderly people.

“The repeated practice by the Israeli army of deliberate and wanton destruction of homes and civilian property is a grave violation of international human rights and humanitarian law, notably of Articles 33 and 53 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and constitutes a war crime,” said Amnesty International.

This last wave of destruction between 10 and 12 October is part of a policy which the Israeli army has been carrying out in the Occupied Territories for decades and increasingly so in recent years. In the past three years the Israeli army has destroyed some 4,000 Palestinian homes in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, as well as vast areas of cultivated land, hundreds of factories and other commercial properties, roads and public buildings.

The Israeli authorities have frequently contended that the destruction of Palestinian homes and other properties was necessary for the success of their military/security operations, and that therefore it was permitted by international humanitarian law. However, investigations by Amnesty International and other organizations, including Israeli NGOs, have shown a recurring pattern of destruction of homes and property as a collective punishment, to punish local residents for attacks by Palestinian armed groups.

On this occasion Israeli officials justified the destruction of more than 100 Palestinian homes as due to the presence in the area of three tunnels reportedly used by Palestinian armed groups to smuggle weapons from Egypt into the Gaza Strip. No weapons were reported to have been found. Israeli officials have not explained why the threat posed by the tunnels could not have been tackled by proportionate means that did not recklessly endanger the lives of civilians and did not render hundreds of Palestinians homeless. The army also claimed that armed Palestinians used the now-destroyed homes to fire on Israeli soldiers. However, they have not claimed that the inhabitants of these homes were themselves involved in any shooting or armed resistance.

The Israeli army says it has uncovered 70 smuggling tunnels in Rafah in the past three years and in the same period it has destroyed more than 1,000 homes in the area. “In most cases examined by Amnesty International, the extensive destruction of Palestinian homes and properties repeatedly carried out by the Israeli army was not justifiable on grounds of absolute military necessity,” said Amnesty International. “Such wanton destruction is unlawful and constitutes a war crime.”

Amnesty International calls on the Israeli authorities to put an immediate end to the practice of destroying Palestinian homes and other properties, and of using excessive, disproportionate and reckless force against unarmed Palestinians and in densely populated residential areas, which frequently result in the killing and injuring of unarmed civilians, including children.The organization has repeatedly condemned the deliberate killings of Israeli civilians by Palestinian armed groups as a crime against humanity and reiterates its calls on these groups to immediately halt such practices.

Background:

Much of the destruction of homes and agricultural land in recent years has been in the Gaza Strip, one of the most densely populated areas in the world, where more than two thirds of the population now live under the poverty line (of US $ 2 per day). According to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the body which cares for Palestinian refugees, 76 homes were completely destroyed, 44 were partially destroyed and 117 damaged, and the number of refugees left homeless by this latest wave of home demolitions may be over 1,000.

On this occasion, as in many previous operations by the Israeli army involving the destruction of homes, at least six Palestinians, including two children were killed and scores of others, many of them children, were injured during the period of 10 to 12 October. Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention on the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War clearly states that “collective penalties are prohibited… Reprisal against protected persons and their properties are prohibited.” Article 53 of the same Convention states that “any destruction by the Occupying Power… is prohibited, except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations.”

Amnesty International condemns the deliberate killings of Israeli civilians by Palestinian armed groups as a crime against humanity

Amnesty International has strongly condemned Israel for the unlawful killing of Hamas’ leader Sheikh Ahmad Yassin and several other civilians this morning in the Gaza Strip.

Amnesty International strongly condemns the assassination of Sheikh Yassin](http://news.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE150292004) Amnesty Int, 22 March 04

The entire world, except the United States has condemnded this latest violation of international law, but let us not forget that Israel is a criminal state anyway.

Here’s some more on similar lines - criticism of Israel and its ethnic cleansing is a big no no in the free world. Mary Robinson should have been more assertive in her protest against the libel.

Several examples are given of organisers of events s***ing in their pants because the zionist lobby says “Boo”.

"Criticize Israel?

Behold Mary Robinson, … has made a big mistake. She dared to criticise Israel. She suggested - horror of horrors - that “the root cause of the Arab-Israeli conflict is the occupation”. Now whoah there a moment, Mary! “Occupation”? Isn’t that a little bit anti-Israeli?

Are you really suggesting that the military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip by Israel, its use of extrajudicial executions against Palestinian gunmen, the Israeli gunning down of schoolboy stone-throwers, the wholesale theft of Arab land to build homes for Jews, is in some way wrong?

your response to these scurrilous libels, to these slurs upon your right to free speech, to these slanderous attacks on your integrity, was a pussy-cat’s whimper. You were “very hurt and dismayed”. It is, you told The Irish Times, “distressing that allegations are being made that are completely unfounded”.

You should have threatened your accusers with legal action.

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary defines “anti-Semitism” as “opposition to Zionism: sympathy with opponents of the state of Israel”.

Come again? If you or I suggest - or, indeed, if poor wee Mary suggests - that the Palestinians are getting a raw deal under Israeli occupation, then we are “anti-Semitic”. It is only fair, of course, to quote the pitiful response of the Webster’s official publicist, Mr Arthur Bicknell, who was asked to account for this grotesque definition.

“Our job,” he responded, “is to accurately reflect English as it is actually being used. We don’t make judgement calls; we’re not political.” Even more hysterically funny and revolting, he says that the dictionary’s editors tabulate “citational evidence” about anti-Semitism published in “carefully written prose-like books and magazines”. Preposterous as it is, this Janus-like remark is worthy of the hollowest of laughs.

I’ve just received a justifiably outraged note from Bathsheba Ratskoff, a producer and editor at the American Media Education Foundation (MEF), who says that their new documentary on “the shutting-down of debate around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict” - in reality a film about Israel’s public relations outfits in America - has been targeted by the “Jewish Action (sic) Task Force”. The movie Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land was to be shown at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts.

So what happened? The “JAT” demanded an apology to the Jewish community and a “pledge (for) greater sensitivity (sic) when tackling Israel and the Middle East conflict in the future”. JAT members “may want to consider threatening to cancel their memberships and to withhold contributions”.

In due course, a certain Susan Longhenry of the Museum of Fine Arts wrote a creepy letter to Sut Jhally of the MEF, referring to the concerns of “many members of the Boston community” - otherwise, of course, unidentified - suggesting a rescheduled screening (because the original screening would have fallen on the Jewish Sabbath) and a discussion that would have allowed critics to condemn the film. The letter ended - and here I urge you to learn the weasel words of power - that “we have gone to great lengths to avoid cancelling altogether screenings of this film; however, if you are not able to support the revised approach, then I’m afraid we’ll have no choice but to do just that”.

Does Ms Longhenry want to be a mouse? Or does she want to have the verb “to longhenry” appear in Webster’s? Or at least in the Oxford? Fear not, Ms Longhenry’s boss overrode her pusillanimous letter. For the moment, at least.

So let me end on a positive note. Just as Bathsheba is a Jewish American, British Jews are also prominent in an organisation called Deir Yassin Remembered, which commemorates the massacre of Arab Palestinians by Jewish militiamen outside Jerusalem in 1948. This year, they remembered the Arab victims of that massacre - 9 April - on the same day that Christians commemorated Good Friday.
…"
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=30&ItemID=5401