Re: [Alternate] History of Religion
Couple of observations:
- Some quotes from divine books are taken out of context
- If you have a theory and then you look for "proof" in divine books, you will surely find it. (POliticans do that all the time)
- The counter arguments (e.g, where they prove Christ is not documented) were extremely weak - if not totally ignorable
- There was v.weak bakcing of what documentary was claiming. E.g, "age" how does that mean 1520 years? Just because the word "Age" is used multiple times doesn't mean ....
- Documentary establishes couple of UNPROVEN hypothesis and builds the whole thing on that. If you accept the HYPOTHESIS then yes it is true - but thats not proper.
Entertaining none-the-less!