Along with Pakistan,India refuses visa to UN team probing SriLanka genocide.

UNHRC should first investigate the mass murders committed by the L.T.T.E .

Ahmadiyya Times: India refuses visa to UN team probing Sri Lanka human rights violations

olombo: India has refused to grant visas to the United Nations team appointed by the High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay to probe the alleged human rights violations during the last seven years of three-decades long conflict in Sri Lanka.

India and four other South Asian countries have united in expressing objection to the UN probe mandated by a resolution adopted at the 25th session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva in March 2014.

Commissioner of the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission, Dr. Prathiba Mahanamahewa has said that India has rejected to provide visa to the investigations committee to enter that country to conduct the probe, national news agency Lankapuvath reported.

Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan and the Maldives have expressed their objection to the international investigation into Sri Lanka.

The investigation team appointed by Pillay to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the alleged war crimes committed by Sri Lanka’s security forces and the Tamil terrorists comprises 13 members and three experts.

While conducting investigations from Western countries, the team has sought to conduct the investigations in a country close to Sri Lanka since Sri Lanka has refused to cooperate with the investigation.

“India is an important country in this regard, but India has rejected entry. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Maldives are in a similar stance, they are not willing to provide support for a suggestion brought on an individual country. They will want to conduct investigations in a country that is close to Sri Lanka, since they cannot enter Sri Lanka,” Dr. Mahanamahewa has said.

The human rights official has noted that even Afghanistan has shown their objection towards the probe. “The SAARC countries have united for the first time in this manner,” Dr. Mahanamahewa added.

“The UNHRC Committee will have to conduct the investigation from outside South Asia. They will have to contact witnesses in Sri Lanka through Skype and teleconferencing,” he has said.

He said refusal of visas is a very significant gesture from the part of the Indian leadership.

Pillay last month appointed Nobel Laureate Martti Ahtisaari, international judge Dame Silvia Cartwright of New Zealand, and Ms Asma Jahangir, former President of Pakistan’s Supreme Court Bar Association as experts to the investigative team which will be coordinated by senior human rights official Ms. Sandra Beidas.

Earlier this month India reiterated that it is against sending the UN team to Sri Lanka to probe human rights violations allegedly committed by the Sri Lankan security forces during the decades-long war.

India’s External Affairs Ministry, recalling that India abstained on the Resolution and also voted against the specific paragraph that wanted to send a team to the island, has said that the international bodies need to address human rights through a cooperative framework, not a punitive approach.

Meanwhile, the committee appointed by Navi Pillay will initiate its investigations from three different locations worldwide. Centers established in New York, Bangkok and Geneva will initiate the investigations connecting via Skype, and Satellite, the agency reported.

Re: Along with Pakistan,India refuses visa to UN team probing SriLanka genocide.

Why are all South Asian countries with conflicting interests trying to protect SL from such a probe ?

Re: Along with Pakistan,India refuses visa to UN team probing SriLanka genocide.

^that is what, i am thinking. Why are we not cooperating with UN.

Re: Along with Pakistan,India refuses visa to UN team probing SriLanka genocide.

because then they wont have franshipzz when its their turn to answer probes in their own countries - kashmir, balochistan, nepali commis, maldives’ election fixing by gayyum… we no vant no probes. we be idiots.

Re: Along with Pakistan,India refuses visa to UN team probing SriLanka genocide.

Their are protecting their friends.

Pakistan aligned with the Sri Lankan government years ago (it is a major arms provider to Sri Lanka). Protecting Sri Lanka from investigation will help to safeguard future Pakistani arms sales as well as secure the influence Pakistan has been building with Sri Lanka.

Re: Along with Pakistan,India refuses visa to UN team probing SriLanka genocide.

Why should there be a probe in the first place? Why is the U.N acting biased and prejudice towards Colombo?If a credible probe has to take place,why they are not probing the L.T.T.E ‘s terrorist activities in the first place?This organization was responsible for mass murders,forced I.D.P’s,assassinating state premiers,numerous suicide bombings,killing politicians and activists,hacking Muslims to death,forcing Muslims to leave the North East,razing down temples,employing child soldiers,smuggling,illegal weapon trading,holding a diaspora for ransom,for executing the first ever suicide bombing in the history of the world,for inventing' the lethal belt bomb,for employing a s**t as the first ever female suicide bomber in the history of manking and human civilization to kill one of the most promising leaders then(Mr.Rajiv) and turning on a peace mission contributed by India(I.P.K.F).The L.T.T.E had also garnered a self inflicted badge of never reliable’ by cowardly and willfully reneging on peace treaties,truce,ceasefire and conducting ceasefire violations.It had declared,waged and continued a destructive war against a sovereign state for over two decades and If the U.N has to probe all these,I am sure,it would take them at least 500 years to complete their `investigation’.

The U.N was a mere moot spectator when the L.T.T.E was on a rampage and on a killing spree and what it has got to offer now?

What had happened on the final days of the war was just a collateral damage.It can happen in any conflict.

Re: Along with Pakistan,India refuses visa to UN team probing SriLanka genocide.

The Hindu : LTTE and Muslims

                                        IN OCTOBER 1990, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) ordered the  100,000 Muslims then living in Jaffna to leave. The Muslims vacated  their ancestral homes and lands and fled south to mainland Sri Lanka in  less time than the 48-hour notice the Tigers gave them. Earlier that  year, the Tigers killed over 100 men in a simultaneous attack on two  mosques in eastern Sri Lanka. The incidents drove a wedge between Tamils  and Muslims. The Muslims —  who are linguistically Tamil —  decided to  strengthen a separate religion-based political identity rather than  continue to affiliate themselves with Hindu and Christian Tamils on the  basis of language.  
                                        Since then, they have grown as a political force in Sri Lanka. The Sri  Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) helped form and topple governments in  Colombo. But despite the mutual distrust between Muslims and Tamils that  arose from the LTTE's actions, the two communities managed to live in  tenuous peace in the east, where Muslims are most numerous. Since the  February 2002 ceasefire between the Government and the LTTE, that peace  has become increasingly fragile. Muslims have discovered their political  gains in Colombo count for little with the Tigers, now the de facto  rulers of the north-east. They form the biggest minority in the  Tamil-dominated region, but the Tigers, who have been permitted to run  it pretty much independently of the Sri Lankan Government, are treating  them the same way as Sinhala politicians treated Tamils.  
                                        The Tigers have been picking on Muslims in the east, harassing farmers,  fishermen and traders from the community, extorting money from them,  occupying their lands and kidnapping individuals for ransom. Even before  the ceasefire, Muslims were particular targets of the Tigers. After the  ceasefire, the incidents have become more frequent. The University  Teachers' Human Rights (UTHR), a Sri Lankan rights group that focusses  on the situation in the north-east, says in a recent report that 26  Muslims have died since the ceasefire. Two are missing. There have been  at least five curfew situations. Earlier, Muslims could turn to the army  or the Government for protection. Now, with the Government's *laissez faire *attitude towards the Tigers, they feel stripped of that safety net. 
                                        The little fishing town of Mutur in Trincomalee in eastern Sri Lanka  presents a clear picture of the current dynamic between the Tigers and  Muslims. Trincomalee district has an even mix of Tamils, Muslims and  Sinhalese. Mutur, a one-hour boat ride from Trincomalee town across the  waters of a wide bay, is home to 60,000 people, some 33,000 are Muslim,  22,000 Tamils and a thousand Sinhalese. Most of the Muslims are settled  in the main town. Most of the Tamils live in the areas around it. After  the ceasefire, Mutur was the scene of two major clashes between the two  communities. The first incident came within months of the ceasefire. A  concrete cross outside Mutur town was vandalised. Tamils, led by the  Tigers, and Muslims clashed over the desecration. There were incidents  of stone-throwing. Houses were damaged, a mosque was desecrated. The  LTTE's office at Mutur, which had just then been opened under the terms  of the ceasefire accord, came in for some stone-throwing. The violence  spread to Valaichenai in Batticaloa where it assumed more serious  proportions with fully armed Tamils fighting Muslims, resulting in  deaths and injuries to many.  
                                        The tensions from that flare-up simmered till April this year when two  Muslim youth from a fishing hamlet near Mutur disappeared after putting  out to sea. Their families learnt that the two were being held by the  Tigers in Sambur, an LTTE-controlled area. They visited Sambur every day  to plead with the Tigers for the boys' release. Two weeks later, after  the mother of one committed suicide triggering off riots in Mutur, the  Tigers denied the boys were in their custody. By then, three people had  died, houses and other property burnt and destroyed, and the divide  between Mutur's Muslims and Tamils complete.  
                                        Denying their involvement in all these incidents, the Tigers allege a  "third force" is inciting trouble between Tamils and Muslims to disrupt  the peace process. But in a region where the Tigers have made it clear  they brook no rivals and ruthlessly kill anyone who challenges their  authority, the allegation of a third force is egregious. Had there been  such a force, the Tigers would have produced the evidence by now instead  of merely making allegations. Or they would have swiftly eliminated it.   
                                        The Muslims are clear they have issues only with the Tigers and not with  the Tamil people. They suspect the Tigers' eventual plan is to drive  out their entire community from the east as they did in Jaffna. But they  cannot do it as crudely. Instead, they are making it increasingly  difficult for Muslims to continue living in the east by targeting their  economy. Muslims control much of the trade and business in the east.  
                                        Why are the Tigers doing this? At the heart of the problem is the LTTE's  view of itself as the absolute ruler of the north-east, which may be  acceptable to Tamils but not to the Muslims. See this against the  changing ethnic composition of the east: in 1981, when the last full  census was conducted in Sri Lanka, Tamils were 43 per cent of the  population in the eastern province, that is in Trincomalee, Batticialoa  and Ampara, while Muslims formed 33 per cent. The estimate now is that  Muslims form nearly 40 per cent of the population, while Tamils are  about 33 per cent. The changed proportions, the reasons for which are  well-documented, have raised a question mark over the cherished Tamil  notion that the north-east, from Jaffna to Ampara, forms a unified Tamil  homeland.  
                                        In the mid-1990s, the SLMC pushed for a sub-regional council carved out  of three Muslim majority enclaves in the east to be included in a new  constitution that President Chandrika Kumaratunga was drafting with the  aim of devolving powers to Tamils in the north-east. Or, the Muslims  argued, keep the north and east as two separate provinces. Muslims fear  that in a unified north-east they will drop to a mere 17 per cent of the  region's population, putting them at the mercy of the majority Tamil  population of the region. The late leader of the SLMC, M.H.M. Ashraff,  agreed to drop the demand only after Ms. Kumaratunga had written in  safeguards for Muslim rights and provisions for power-sharing between  Tamils and Muslims in the draft 2000 Constitution that was later  abandoned by the Government.  
                                        The present leadership of the SLMC is too beset by its own insecurities  to help its embattled constituents in the east. In the first flush of  the ceasefire, Rauff Hakeem, who has led the SLMC since Mr. Ashraff's  death in 2000,  rushed to meet the LTTE leader, Velupillai Prabakaran,  and signed a "memorandum of understanding" that the Tigers would not  harass Muslims, would not impose "taxes" on them and would return the  lands they had taken from Muslim farmers. The LTTE did not honour its  commitments. Instead of cementing Mr. Hakeem's leadership of the  Muslims, the Hakeem-Prabakaran meeting became an endorsement of the  LTTE's control over Muslims.  
                                        Now the Government of Ranil Wickremesinghe is preparing to legitimise  the de facto rule of the Tigers over the north-east through an "interim  administration". The Government proposals for the interim administration  include representation for the Muslims. The Tigers are yet to respond  to these proposals. In any case, the Tigers will hold the reins of any  administrative set-up in the north-east. Hardline Sinhalese see in the  present situation an opportunity to deny the Tamil claim of north-east  Sri Lanka as a homeland, exacerbating tensions between Muslims and  Tamils. 
                                         Meanwhile, the attitude of the Tigers has given rise to an eye for an  eye atmosphere in Mutur. A Tamil youth disappeared after the killings of  two Muslim boys in Trincomalee town in August. The UTHR report points  to rising vigilantism among Mutur Muslims. Community leaders deny  rumours they are arming themselves. They say they are trying to channel  Muslim anger through democratic routes. But they also warn that if the  LTTE continues to treat them badly, Muslim youth might begin to think  that the only way to claim their rights from the Tamils is through  militancy, just as the LTTE took to arms to win Tamil rights from the  Sinhalese. The Sri Lankan Government must heed this warning. It cannot  pretend this is an issue between Muslims and Tamils and therefore not  its problem. Ultimately, the Government has to take responsibility for  all its people, regardless of ethnicity