As an example, the thing we were discussing earlier: Fixed Planetary Paths. If you take the Quran literally, there shouldn't be any variation, but its clear that fixed means predictable. And sure as hell the paths are predictable.
Thanks. That's more like Astronomy...don't know why it should be called "Allah and global warming"?
so how did people explain that accident with the plane where the pilot landed on the river? Evolution? Wonder? Miracle? Pilot getting a medal and the religious books being kicked and burnt? They will not believe. How much the Qur'an is right.
so how did people explain that accident with the plane where the pilot landed on the river? Evolution? Wonder? Miracle? Pilot getting a medal and the religious books being kicked and burnt? They will not believe. How much the Qur'an is right.
How about something called BRAINS?
Brains granted by Allah SWT THROUGH evolution to the pilot.
There are lots of controversial issues and science has been used to refute or support those issues.
May I ask if you read any scientific journals or news at all?
They have lots of theories and ideas which get debunked or are considered controversial.
**Science is an ever changing field. Some rules are fixed but a lot of concepts which revolve around these fixed rules keep changing as we gain more knowledge.
**
Hence, science is not always perfect nor it is always proven as fact.
Just one site for you to read:
P.S. Still don’t have message but: Einstein was not an atheist.
Search his info yourself.
Bhai, I’m talking about major theories. And what you are talking about is called “On Going research”. I wrote it on your visitor messages, but I’ll write it here too:
I don’t try to imagine a personal God; it suffices to
stand in awe at the structure of the world, insofar as it
allows our inadequate senses to appreciate it.
It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious
convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I
do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied
this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me
which can be called religious then it is the unbounded
admiration for the structure of the world so far as our
science can reveal it.
The idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and seems
even naive.
Those were merely examples. Big theories like big bang theory , evolution theory, Global warming are among a lot of other ‘theories’/ideas which even scientists acknowledge being controversial.
As to Einstein: He was not an atheist. None of your examples proves he was.
Actually he DID believe in existence of God. The God of Spinoza. Some thoughts which are mentioned may say he was an agnostic. But still NOT an atheist.
Sorry, I thought your message would come as Private message. I rarely check my personal page.
My GOD! You refuse to acknowledge the evidence when it is staring you in the face. What part of “It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God…” do you NOT understand?
Mate, you need to get off that acid. No serious scientist contests the Big Bang Theory and the Evolution Theory. Please give evidence for your claims. U talked about scientific magazines, show me articles printed in RESPECTABLE JOURNALS, by RESPECTABLE SCIENTISTS that oppose these theories. These theories are only considered controversial by ultra-religious people like you.
My GOD! You refuse to acknowledge the evidence when it is staring you in the face. What part of "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God..." do you NOT understand?
Mate, you need to get off that acid. No serious scientist contests the Big Bang Theory and the Evolution Theory. Please give evidence for your claims. U talked about scientific magazines, show me articles printed in RESPECTABLE JOURNALS, by RESPECTABLE SCIENTISTS that oppose these theories. These theories are only considered controversial by ultra-religious people like you.
Thanks. That's more like Astronomy...don't know why it should be called "Allah and global warming"?
hareem I open a little thread when I got shocked listening to surah.
I did not know some ppl wanted to show their brain muscle so badly. That they wont first understand what is being said.
You know I always heard those islami-scinecei discussions, funny thing about them is ppl with biggest mouth often dont have the clue
of subject.
If you browse the thread you would see all smarty pants tend to expert on cosmology history, sociology, language.
I give you an example.. you need to have basic music sense in order to appropriate pure music.
Every single time I read a story about a scientist being stunned by koran, you will also hear he was desperate to get idea out of
any usual pattern.
Or some some other experts gets inspired ABOUT THERE OWN FIELD!!!!
I am surprised to see most of us don't have a freaking clue how we(human) are putting things out of balance on this earth.. that our existence would be soon challenged.
We have no idea of whats its elements are.. and how the whole thing play out.
Now if these cowboys knew it.. they would appreciate some one telling whole race that dont f-k things up for others.
But again I could not stop admiring the beauty truth and accuracy.
Ok so the whole point of the thread changes to Evolution. That should be a separate topic of discussion.
Somebody said that **Science triumphs all . **Don't remember who did but my question is: If Science does triumph ALL...why hasn't it been able to triumph over death and life itself?
And please do not give me examples like cloning, In vitro fertilization, artificial insemination or all the theories and studies to prevent ageing of cells. Why hasn't science been able to reproduce a sperm cell or an ovum?
And don't start dissing faith immediately. It's a discussion and am open to all sort of views and ideas. I just want a simple, clear answer to what I ask. If there's no Higher Power why can't we be master of death and life ourselves. How is this happening all by itself?
Even a simple machine doesn't appear out of no where. It has a certain manufacturer. So where did we come from ? Aren't we probably the most complex of machines in scientific terms?
Ok so the whole point of the thread changes to Evolution. That should be a separate topic of discussion.
Somebody said that **Science triumphs all . **Don't remember who did but my question is: If Science does triumph ALL...why hasn't it been able to triumph over death and life itself?
And please do not give me examples like cloning, In vitro fertilization, artificial insemination or all the theories and studies to prevent ageing of cells. Why hasn't science been able to reproduce a sperm cell or an ovum?
And don't start dissing faith immediately. It's a discussion and am open to all sort of views and ideas. I just want a simple, clear answer to what I ask. If there's no Higher Power why can't we be master of death and life ourselves. How is this happening all by itself?
Even a simple machine doesn't appear out of no where. It has a certain manufacturer. So where did we come from ? Aren't we probably the most complex of machines in scientific terms?
At least arguing with Diwana is fun, laughing at his inability to comprehend clear cut evidence. But arguing with people like you is just plain boring. Go read the whole thread again and you will find the answer to your questions.