lets try another one lol..
if you or anyone named Isa or Moosa, it doesnt automatically make you christian or jew. You keep this name because they were prophet's name.. same is the case with Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS. Name itself means servent of Ahmad. How can the follower of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS be called the follower of Ghulam Ahmad AS , when he Himself was a servent of Ahmad (Muhammad PBUH)? Ahmadis are the servent of the servent of Ahmad (Muhammad PBUH). Name Ahmad applies to Muhammad PBUH as well as Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS. Taking the meaning of Ahmadi would simply mean follower of Hazrat Mustafa SAW as well as Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS.
Calling them Mirzai would hurt them because it is a misleading term, and would imlpy only if ahmadis were followers of Ghulam Ahmad AS and not followers of Hazrat Muhammad PBUH.
Calling them Qadiyanis doesnt make sense at all, since the term Qadiyani is only implied to those who're from that city, just as if resident of Lahore would be called Lahorie, or Multan for Multani etc.. Thus Qadiyani would refer to where they are from rather than who they are. There are many qadiyanis who are not ahmadis, just like there are many Lahories who are not sunnis..
conclusion .. best to refer to them as Ahmadis.
PS: this topic is not about what they should be called. My response to this topic has been given above. No more reply from my side now, which will start getting off topic.
PS: also, his death has been talked about here.. please use the search option.
Utter nonsense.
same is the case with Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS. Name itself means servent of Ahmad. How can the follower of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad AS be called the follower of Ghulam Ahmad AS , when he Himself was a servent of Ahmad (Muhammad PBUH)? Ahmadis are the servent of the servent of Ahmad (Muhammad PBUH).
-How can he be a servant when the servant claims to be a NABI (Nauzubillah) and a prophet himself? Thus violating the very fundamental concept of Islam.
-He calimed to be a Massiah... second coming of christ...and we all know how wrong he was don't we? Eh!
-Then he claimed tobe the Mahdi... another Prohpet. I wonder why he didn't calimed to be Prince Charles? He might as well have!
-Rejecting the idea of armed Jihad. Fancied that as well.
-And an over two dozen new regulations, in the religion called Islam...
Conclusion: Refrain yourself from talking senseless material, when the guy truely has his own beliefs and has moulded another to such an extent its quite difficult to relate...So stop referring HIS teachings as the teachings of The ProPhet Muhammad (P.B.U.H).
Thank You.