this person i heard about had a good running desi restaurant. then someone started spreading rumours about them that they are ahmadi (no harm in that). the real problem arrived when their customers stopped eating at their restaurant (cuz theyre ahmadi) and eventually their business died down and teamed with some other streaks of bad luck their business vanished.
this i believe happened because of the popular sunni/shia fatwa that says you cant eat from an ahmadi’s place. so, keeping that in mind, can someone please tell me whay the ***K do these people then eat from burger king and mcdonalds and got knows billions of other non-SUNNI/SHIA establishments?
If anything from what I've heard, don't quote me on this but the Qadiyani's don't believe Prophet Muhammad being the last Prophet therefore their 'halaal food' could be a deception.
As for eating at mcD's and BK, keeping in mind these folks don't eat the meat but only vegetarian food which is hardly available at most desi establishments.
There's no harm in eating vegetarian food at their place, but meat slaughtered by them is not halal because in Islam we are only allowed to eat meat slaughtered by Muslims and the Ahl-ul-Kitaab (Jews & Christians)
PS. The meat slaughtered by the Jews and Christians wil only be permssible if it was slaughtered in the proper Islamic way and the name of Allah was mentioned whilst slaughtering.
While we are engaged in this useless debate, might as well pop a question.
What commonly certifies meat as 'halal' or 'zabeeha' is the reciting of the first Kalima, and the fact that the animal is being sacrificed in the name of Allah SWT. A sacrifice does not have any reference to the Prophet SAW whatsoever.
Now, if the issue of prophethood is what differentiates 'Ahmadis' from 'Non-Ahmadis', then shouldnt it be ok to eat at an 'Ahmadi's'? Ahmadis refer to Allah SWT while sacrificing, dont they? And if the argument is that the issue of prophethood nullifies their reference to Allah SWT, then why are jewish and christian sacrifices deemed right? Afterall, their original difference with Muslims too remains in reference to Prophethood, doesnt it? Originally, Christians and Jews too believe in One Supreme Creator, dont they? And apart from that, they toy around a lot with the concept of Prophethod, but their 'original' concept of God is the same as that of Muslims, which is why Allah SWT allowed Muslims to eat meat sacrificed by Ahl-e-Kitaab.
Now why would 'Ahmedis' be discriminated against based on their belief in Prophethood, when that aspect doesnt have anything to do when it comes to sacrifice?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by TaZ123: *
There's no harm in eating vegetarian food at their place, but meat slaughtered by them is not halal because in Islam we are only allowed to eat meat slaughtered by Muslims and the Ahl-ul-Kitaab (Jews & Christians)
PS. The meat slaughtered by the Jews and Christians wil only be permssible if it was slaughtered in the proper Islamic way and the name of Allah was mentioned whilst slaughtering.
Allah Ta'ala knows best.
[/QUOTE]
Why dont you do us all a favor and not eat at our resteraunts at all... We dont want to contaminating our air space.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Akif: *
While we are engaged in this useless debate, might as well pop a question.
What commonly certifies meat as 'halal' or 'zabeeha' is the reciting of the first Kalima, and the fact that the animal is being sacrificed in the name of Allah SWT. A sacrifice does not have any reference to the Prophet SAW whatsoever.
Now, if the issue of prophethood is what differentiates 'Ahmadis' from 'Non-Ahmadis', then shouldnt it be ok to eat at an 'Ahmadi's'? Ahmadis refer to Allah SWT while sacrificing, dont they? And if the argument is that the issue of prophethood nullifies their reference to Allah SWT, then why are jewish and christian sacrifices deemed right? Afterall, their original difference with Muslims too remains in reference to Prophethood, doesnt it? Originally, Christians and Jews too believe in One Supreme Creator, dont they? And apart from that, they toy around a lot with the concept of Prophethod, but their 'original' concept of God is the same as that of Muslims, which is why Allah SWT allowed Muslims to eat meat sacrificed by Ahl-e-Kitaab.
Now why would 'Ahmedis' be discriminated against based on their belief in Prophethood, when that aspect doesnt have anything to do when it comes to sacrifice?
[/QUOTE]
Because the majority of your Muslim Brothers and sisters need an excuse to make an Ahmedis life even more difficult then before.