Agentina's Nationalization of Pension Plans

Source: CNN

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) – Argentina President Cristina Fernandez proposed a government takeover of nearly US$30 billion in private pension funds on Tuesday, saying retirees must be protected from the global financial crisis.

Fernandez: “Argentina must protect our retirees.”

But her move spooked investors and triggered steep falls in Argentine stocks and bonds.

“While the U.S. and other countries are stepping in to rescue their banks, Argentina must protect our retirees,” Fernandez said as she signed a nationalization bill that now goes to Argentina’s Congress, which is expected to approve it within weeks.

Fernandez said she’s required by the constitution to guarantee pensions. And Amando Boudo, executive director of the national social security administration, said “the government’s only motivation to carry out this measure was to rescue our future and current pensioners from uncertainty.”

But political opponents called it a scramble to prop up revenue that has fallen along with prices of soy and other commodities.

The Buenos Aires’ Merval index closed down 10.99 percent at 1,047, after dropping more than 13 percent in mid-day trading. Benchmark Argentine bonds fell by an average of 7 percent, fueling the country risk measured by JP Morgan’s EMBI+ index to 1,604 basis points.

“It tells the market that the government thinks it can change the rule of the game whenever its wants, which has caused Merval to fall, while the rest of the world remains steady,” said Camilo Tiscornia, an economist with the Buenos Aires consultancy Castiglioni, Tiscornia y Asociados.

The 10 companies that manage the funds were banned from trading on the Buenos Aires stock exchange for seven working days by federal Judge Claudio Bonadio, who blamed their dumping of bonds and stocks for provoked the sharp drop.

Economic analyst Rogelio Frigerio in Buenos Aires called it “a desperate measure to fill the coffers of the public sector.” Political opposition leader Elisa Carrio accused the government of trying to “loot the funds of retirees.”

The nationalization would provide the government with enough cash to pay off millions in debt and finance infrastructure projects starved for credit. But Argentine governments have had a mixed record in managing pensions.

When Argentines were allowed to switch between private and public pension funds last year, only 20 percent opted for the government’s plan. About one-fourth of Argentina’s 40 million citizens use the private funds, contributing a total of $4.6 billion annually.

The private accounts, created in 1994 during a wave of privatizations, include Arauca Bit AFJP; Consolidar fund run by BBVA Banco Frances SA, a unit of Spain’s BBVA; HSBC Holdings Plc’s Maxima fund; Met AFJP, which is run by MetLife Inc; Origenes, owned by ING Groep NV; Futura AFJP; Nacion AFJP, run by Argentina’s National Bank; Profesion + Auge AFJP; Unidos S.A. AFJP; Previsol AFJP S.A.


Why is it that Argentina does so well for a while and then something like this pops up? Will the privatization actually help or harm the country?

I think in the long run the country needs to take a close look its national investment portfolio. Maybe the country relies to heavily on agriculture… maybe a step towards Industrialism?

Atleast thats what I think Pakistan should be doing-- but now i’m going off on a tangent.

Re: Agentina's Nationalization of Pension Plans

I think your point about their source of revenue is a fator, how much value added goods are they selling versus commodities?

Re: Agentina's Nationalization of Pension Plans

From what I know not allot...

now when you say commodities-- what do you mean exactly?
other then Pork bellies -- i dont even know if thats true.

Re: Agentina’s Nationalization of Pension Plans

The info below will explain better. by comodity products I mean products that really cant be differentiated from someone else making the same products and then the principle selling point becomes price. I dont see a large amount of value add products and services accounting for their exports. its the same as Pakistan exporting raw cotton and then importing levis.

Foreign trade of Argentina - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Argentine exports are mainly of the agricultural type, mostly processed goods.
In all, exports of agricultural origin make up 54% of the total.
Soybean products (the beans themselves, feed, oils, etc.) account for 24.1% of total exports. Cereals (mostly wheat and maize) make up for 8.3%.
Beef, for which Argentina is well-known, made up 3.3%.

Industrial manufactures, which twenty years ago were but 10% of exports, provided 31.1% of the total in 2007.
Motor vehicles and parts constituted 9.6% of exports,
chemicals and medicine, 5.3%
and the siderurgical industry (mostly steel and aluminum), 5.1%.

Fuels and energy provided 12.2% of total exports.
Petrochemical industries provide 7.2% of exports (mainly refined fuels).
Petroleum and natural gas each accounted for 2.3%.
Argentina’s principal mineral export is copper, 2.7%.

Re: Agentina's Nationalization of Pension Plans

When you said Commodities my mind went directly to lead, alum and other LME's
he-he sorry thats the futures accountants' narrow minded thinking..

I see what you mean...
Now if they can produce Cotten and Levi's -- dont you think we'd have an absolute advantage to exporting these products. So isn't the decision naturally twrds a more industrialized country -- for both Pakistan and argentina?

Why the delay?

Re: Agentina's Nationalization of Pension Plans

There has to be some spirit of innovation, some special programs by govt to encourage more indsutrial and information products. Yes other factors play a role but that is the basic

Industrialization has to be balanced because in the end soemone still has to make basic produce, I mean when I go to buy tomaotoes, i am not going to buy canned ones or juices or sundried ones, but i suppose a better mix works. same for uS and the services and information economy, thats all great but someone still has to manufacture stuff.

lets use the example of India and Pakistan and outsourcing, aside from political atability which is a big whammie, what keeps Pakistan from having the type of success thaty india has in being a BPO destination? education? incentives? infratstructure?

Apply the same thinking to industry.

Re: Agentina's Nationalization of Pension Plans

After the run on banks and currencies its countries that are needing bailouts, its the after effects of the credit crunch, while common sense says it should be countries with poor fundamentals that get hit..we have countries like south Korea, argentina, hungary, iceland and Pakistan that are facing collpase if they don't get bailed out. In economic terms korea is a major worry because of the precedent while Pakistan collapsed is dangerous from a global security point of view