**(Age/2) + 7 = Min
(Age -7) * 2 = Max**
Yes? No?
Why? How?
**(Age/2) + 7 = Min
(Age -7) * 2 = Max**
Yes? No?
Why? How?
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
The variables in the equations need to be defined.
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
Age needs to be defined?
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
there is no formula that can gauge the mental maturity. age is just a number. don’t play with it! ![]()
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
Any time a new variable is thrown in, it is suggested the author define it. Though I did check the rules. It is not mandatory.
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
Hope you didn’t check the constitution ![]()
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
Where is mental maturity in the equation ![]()
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
My constitution is not up for that arduous task.
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
I think Reviewer #2](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=2) is suggesting that you include the following constraint to the set of equations in OP -
Mental maturity stays with acceptable range.
As you correctly pointed out, there is no equation relating age to mental maturity. So at the least, your text should have the following caveat:
Note that this set of equations doesn’t guarantee compatibility with respect to mental maturity.
With this small change, your paper will be accepted for publication, as long as the manuscript is consistent with our guidelines as outlined in JournalofAgeCompatibility.com
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
where a is the mental maturity, k is the life time and n are instances of falling in love
(Age/2) + 7 = Min
(Age -7) * 2 = Max
O boy, I see a transaction paper!!!
Re: Age Range Compatibility Equation
As demonstrated above, throwing in a complicated equation that is above the Reviewers head is a surefire way of getting the paper accepted.
Nicely done.