Can someone explain the logic behind retaining Agarkar over Sreesanth for the ICC Champions trophy? Mind boggling.
Re: Agarkar vs. Sreesanth
because Agarkar does not do this
Re: Agarkar vs. Sreesanth
Couple of reasons -
1. Agarkar's performance was better in the West Indies.
2. Team India is moving towards a balance between experience & youth to prepare for 2007. All the other seamers in the team are relatively young/inexperienced. So makes sense to keep Agarkar.
There was also talk about dropping RP Singh over Sreesanth.
Re: Agarkar vs. Sreesanth
----------------cvabn---------------------
Hahahaha, HUUUUhaaaaa, huhahuha,hmmm ,:omg:
Re: Agarkar vs. Sreesanth
lol so true.
Re: Agarkar vs. Sreesanth
Agarkars alright...he was their only good bowler against the Windies...hes also quite nippy at around 87mph...and hes a better batsman down the order...
Neither is particularly good but Sreesanth is a much better test bowler...and a much better dancer to boot...