Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan "tie" to AQ Khan

VIENNA (Reuters) - Afghanistan urged the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Wednesday to tackle what it called the Pakistani government’s apparent knowledge of a Pakistani-led ring responsible for the illicit spread of atom bomb know-how.

Western-backed Afghanistan is bidding for a seat on the International Atomic Energy Agency’s 35-nation Board of Governors. Kabul is competing with Syria, an ally of Iran. A decision by the IAEA’s 145-nation assembly is expected on Friday.

Pakistani authorities have denied any part in the A.Q. Khan smuggling network that provided nuclear weaponization blueprints to Iran, North Korea and Libya before it was broken up in 2004.

Khan, a nuclear scientist lionized by countrymen as the father of Pakistan’s atom bomb, made a televised confession in 2004 to selling nuclear secrets to the three countries.

He was put under house arrest in Islamabad, where he remains, after Pakistan was confronted with evidence by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.

Three months ago he was quoted in a media report as saying Pakistan’s army, spy agency and then-President Pervez Musharraf knew about a past, covert centrifuge sale to North Korea.

KHAN’S CHARGES

The chief of Pakistan’s strategic planning division, which oversees its nuclear arsenal, said Khan’s charges were “categorically wrong and false.”

Khan backed off and pointed to passages in a Musharraf autobiography saying Pakistani police searched a North Korea-bound plane but found nothing because Khan’s associates had been tipped off and never loaded suspect cargo.

“It is regrettable that Khan’s confession clearly indicates the willingness of his own government to participate in such acts,” said Wahid Monawar, Afghanistan’s ambassador to the IAEA.

“We call upon the agency to avail its agenda and discuss this matter with serious consideration,” he told the annual meeting of the IAEA’s General Conference (assembly) in Vienna.

“We cannot sit and watch while such international treaties are violated in a dangerous and irresponsible matter.”

Pakistan has never joined the Non-Proliferation Treaty or permitted IAEA inspectors to interview Khan to help resolve Western intelligence allegations of secret atomic bomb research by Iran, which has denied any such activity.

Monawar told Reuters Kabul was concerned that Afghan Taliban insurgents known to have sanctuaries in border areas of Pakistan “one day might grab off one of those (nuclear) weapons, and the ramifications of that will be grave – how could one explain that? This is a concern of the world.”

Musharraf pardoned Khan and Islamabad has said it considers its investigation of him to be closed.

But IAEA investigators and U.S. officials fear Khan’s secrets may have spread wider than North Korea, Iran and Libya because much of the sensitive information was in electronic form and therefore easily transmitted via the Internet.


bloody afgan traitors.. sold to indian billion dollars aid!! meri bili mujhy miyaoon’!!???

so after saving 10+ million afgani lives gave them shelters food etc and we get this for helping them?

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan "tie" to AQ Khan

who the **** these afghanis r to say such things ?...sala kia oqat hai unki..ajj ISI taliban kay sath mil jaiye to kabul par taliban ka kabza ho jaiye..due to brilliant leaders like musharaf and zardari,we r facing such things...sala border par mines lagao..aur mar bhagao afghan majahirs ko..

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan "tie" to AQ Khan

pakistan is not a signatory to any agreements regarding the sale or transfer of nuclear technology hardware or information be it for weapons or civilian use

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan "tie" to AQ Khan

it is amazing how the bought out Afghan pres is acting so unethically.

the telling sign is his speeches.

Pakistan's unfortunate thing is that the country's pres is incapable of making any formidable statement at all.

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan "tie" to AQ Khan

certainly as guy1 has mentioned this sort of attack on pakistan cannot be tolerated from the afghan government for too long. a price has to be paid but not by the people of afghanistan. i'd support imposig a higher levy on government goods transiting through pakistan. afghanistan government must learn to act responsibly

btw wth is afghanistan doing anywhere near IAEA offices? and preaching to the world about dangers of nuclear tech falling into the wrong hands. is taliban not more likely re-assume power in afghanistan? or does the US plan to occupy it for an extremely longtime and needs more electricity?

Afghanistan..LOL.....

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan “tie” to AQ Khan

Afghanistan is competing for a seat against Syria at the IAEA…thats why this statements…

Pakistan should take appropriate action… :jhanda: :slight_smile:

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan "tie" to AQ Khan

The Pak Govt should play a smart game here. Instead of making it look like it was the Govt that was involved, just tell the rest of the world the leader who did this are no longer in power. If they really want, they can interrogate the past rulers if they ever step outside of Pakistan.

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan "tie" to AQ Khan

^ it doesnt work that way. you cant blame previous rulers when talking to other governments, because you are judged as a country, not as a political party/ruling coalition.

the easiest thing for Germany after WWII would have been to say, oh we didnt kill the jews, it was Hitler. We're sorry, but come on, dont expect us to pay up reparations for something that douche did.

If Pakistan admits it proliferated at the level of its government, then country-level implications follow. It wouldnt be a case against individuals, it would be a case of a country violating international laws.

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan "tie" to AQ Khan

^ The west is already aware of what level it was at, they arent dummies. Its all about damage control. Pakistanis arent to blame for this, its certain people in the Govt that are to blame. Most of these werent elected by the people, and had the blessings of the west to begin with.

Did we ever sign that "non-proliferation" treaty? or any other treat which barred Pakistan from "sharing" the technology?

On the one hand you say the west arent dummies, on the other hand you say we should tell them it wasnt the Pakistani govt, it was the previous govt. I honestly dont think anyone will buy that.

The consequences of a nation's ruler's actions are paid for by the nation, if the nation admits to it they have no grounds to contest whatever penalties are imposed on them. Saying it wasnt us it was the other guy doesnt make an iota of difference.

Come on. By your logic, every country would be sharing with every other country and saying what I dont sign NPT. The IAEA wouldnt exist.

Fact is, NPT is meaningless. Treaties are meaningless except as a vague commitment of how countries will behave. International law is what the powers that be decide it is. And the powers that be have decided that it isnt cool to give out nuclear technology while having it themselves. Pakistan either has to live by it or not. You may be advocating the latter option, but I dont think Pakistan is ready for the consequences. Its rulers certanly arent.

Yes they will. The present regime, led by Zardari, who would want to implicate Zardari, for this crime when he was in jail or recovering from his mental disease abroad?

[quote]

The consequences of a nation's ruler's actions are paid for by the nation, if the nation admits to it they have no grounds to contest whatever penalties are imposed on them. Saying it wasnt us it was the other guy doesnt make an iota of difference.

[/quote]
It wasnt the nation's ruler. It was a military dictator who forced himself on the people and was unpopular. I for one would love to see them implicate their own man in this lovely scandal. Just tell them it was Musharraf, and they'll be off our backs. Problem solved :)

then why was india squealing so hard for 32 years? now that they got the deals from france/US, chain aagyaa hai un ko but they had to sign the treaty which states the civilian n program can be investigated.

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan “tie” to AQ Khan

which merely illustrates my point re: powers that be. It was a unilateral India-US deal which triggered this, arguably going against international law. furthermore, it weakened NPT, not strengthened it. See:

BBC NEWS | World | South Asia | US-India nuclear accord approved

My point is that very rarely are leaders of countries punished for actions of the country (the international criminal court only has jurisdiction over things like genocide etc). When it comes to actions committed by governments, it is countries that pay for the actions of an government, even one out of power. not individuals.

otherwise like I said, nothing would have been simpler for Germany but to blame it all on a dead dictator, and wash themselves of the consquences.

Re: Afghans urge IAEA to tackle Pakistan "tie" to AQ Khan

Afghanistan??? telling Pakistan about nukes, go and watch you face in the mirror(if you make one) first. twats dont know how to make anything apart from drugs