Afghan leader alleges US-Taliban collusion

It seems as if US’s Afghanistan mission will end on a sour note, this was what was expected in any case. Did the US spent trillions of dollars are having thousands of their troops killed for hearing this?

Afghan leader alleges US-Taliban collusion | World | DAWN.COM

Afghan leader alleges US-Taliban collusion

**KABUL: President Hamid Karzai has accused the United States of colluding with the Taliban to justify its presence in Afghanistan, dumbfounding US officials during a problematic visit by the new Pentagon chief.

A joint news conference by Karzai and US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel was cancelled on Sunday, as the Afghan leader’s allegations compounded the troubled nature of the visit after a security scare from twin bomb attacks on Saturday.

“The bombs that were detonated in Kabul and Khost were not a show of force, they were serving America,” Karzai said in a televised speech, referring to the two suicide blasts in which 19 people were killed.**

**The president said the United States was in “daily” talks with the Taliban in Europe and Gulf countries, and that insurgent suicide attacks enabled the international military force to vindicate its deployment in Afghanistan.
**

“It is their slogan for 2014, scaring us that if the US is not here our people will be eliminated,” he said, as US-led combat troops begin a long withdrawal after more than a decade of war.

Karzai, who has frequently lashed out at perceived US slights through inflammatory language, was angered by a new delay to the planned transfer of the controversial Bagram jail from US to Afghan control.

He is also adamant that his government must not be involved in any US-Taliban contacts, although the militia dismisses him as a US puppet and says no dialogue has taken place with the Americans since a year ago.

The president’s news conference with Hagel was scrapped just a few hours before it was due to be held at the presidential palace in Kabul, with US officials citing unspecified security concerns.

General Joseph Dunford, commander of the 100,000 Nato forces in Afghanistan, said Karzai’s allegations were “categorically false”.

“We have no reason to be colluding with the Taliban, we have no reason to be supporting instability in Afghanistan,” he said.

“We’ve fought too hard over the 12 years, we have shed too much blood over the past 12 years, we have done too much to help the Afghan security forces grow over the last 12 years to ever think that violence and instability would be to our advantage.”

The Pentagon chief, on his first official visit to Afghanistan after he endured a difficult confirmation process by the US Senate, tried to downplay tensions with Karzai after they met in private.

“He has his ways,” Hagel said. “There will be new challenges, there will be new issues. It shouldn’t come as a surprise… but I don’t think any of these are challenges that we can’t work (our) way through.

“I told the president that it was not true that the United States was unilaterally working with the Taliban,” he added. “The fact is any prospect for peace or political settlements have to be led by the Afghans.”

Both Hagel and Dunford denied that the US-Afghan relationship was broken, and a senior US official said on condition of anonymity that Washington still felt it could have a “productive relationship” with Karzai and the Afghan government.

But the official added: “We have indicated to him in private that public criticism is not helpful to the partnership, especially when there’s no basis in fact for some of the claims he makes.” The testy exchanges came as the two countries face up to an arduous transition phase in which Nato-led troops exit Afghanistan and Afghan forces take on fighting the Taliban alone.

The United States and Afghanistan are also negotiating a strategic pact that will determine the US presence in Afghanistan after the end of the international combat mission.

Karzai raised another point of friction on Sunday by issuing a decree banning international forces from entering university grounds after alleged harassment of students.

Also troubling US-Afghan ties has been the long dispute over the fate of suspected militants held by US forces at Bagram jail.

A final handover scheduled on Saturday was delayed due to last-minute disagreements, officials from both sides said.

“There’s probably a slight difference of perspective between us and the Afghans and we’re working out that right now,” Dunford admitted, stressing that “Transitions are tough.”

Dunford denied the allegations of Nato harassment of students and declined to say when US Special Forces would leave Wardak province, despite a deadline set by Karzai two weeks ago that expired on Sunday.

Re: Afghan leader alleges US-Taliban collusion

He was installed by Americans, bribed by Indians to speak against Pakistan and now behaving erratically due to his obvious fate that will greet him in near future. He never represented the real Afghanistan and never spoke for Afghan people. His only focus was Pakistan and to tie Pakistan to every problem in his country and allow his country to be used by foreigners in whatever way they wanted to, in return for the aid money which was plundered by his Government.
Now that Americans have announced their withdrawal, he is as good as a dead man and he is realizing it.

Re: Afghan leader alleges US-Taliban collusion

Reminds me of Vietnamistan :D

Re: Afghan leader alleges US-Taliban collusion

a. Refugee in Pakistan after Afghan-USSR war.
b. Employed by, and up till Presidency, was still an employee of UNOCAL. (Google is your best friend)
c. Entered into the Dog-Pony show we've all come to know as 'Free and Fair elections in Afghanistan'. Became President.
d. Paid by the invading "hosts" to turn a blind eye to terror manufacturing targeted at Pakistan, (still ongoing).
e. PRESENT: Being left to fend for self in this cruel dog-eat-dog world after US Forces withdrawal by 2014.

...........I don't know. That's a pretty dicey rap sheet. Mr. Karzai will be in need of some very very forgiving allies very soon. Will he pull it off though?

Re: Afghan leader alleges US-Taliban collusion

New US-Afghan tensions | Opinion | DAWN.COM

US DEFENCE Secretary Chuck Hagel, on his first overseas trip after a bruising confirmation hearing, arrived in Afghanistan probably hoping to hear some words of praise for the “blood and treasure” that the Americans and their allies had expended in Afghanistan.

He must have also hoped for appreciation for the aid they had promised to continue supplying to Afghanistan after the withdrawal of most of the foreign forces there by 2014.

Before his arrival Nato Secretary General Fogh Rasmussen had been in Kabul and had confirmed that Nato was planning on supporting the retention of the 350,000-strong Afghan National Security Force (ANSF) up to 2018 rather than drawing them down to 230,000 as originally planned. This would mean that the $3.6 billion in annual assistance pledged at Chicago would be raised to $5.6bn at least until 2018.

Before his arrival there had also been statements by American spokespersons reassuring Karzai that the US supported an Afghan-owned and Afghan-led reconciliation process and that the planned Taliban office in Qatar would be used only for negotiations between the Taliban and the Afghan High Peace Council.

Hagel probably entertained the hope that he would be able to persuade Afghan President Hamid Karzai that the first step needed for reconciliation was the exchange of the American prisoner held by the Taliban and the five Taliban whose release from Guantanamo Karzai and the Taliban had both demanded. The second would be a Taliban renunciation of ties with Al Qaeda and the third talks between the Taliban and the High Peace Council along the lines of the blueprint for peace formulated by the latter.

Perhaps Hagel had also hoped he would be able to persuade Karzai to withdraw his decree calling for the cessation of all operations by American forces in Maidan Wardak and for the withdrawal of all American Special Operations forces from that province by March 12.

Hagel had reason to believe that an agreement on the transfer of control over Bagram prison to Afghan forces, which Karzai saw as an assertion of Afghan sovereignty, would be implemented during Hagel’s visit. Karzai had insisted on this during his visit to Washington and on return had informed his parliament in January that this was now on the verge of being achieved.

This transfer, which was to have happened on Saturday, was cancelled after Karzai vetoed an agreement that his officials had negotiated with the Americans. The point of contention apparently was the American insistence that formally or informally the Americans needed to retain a veto power on the release of prisoners they perceived as “enduring security threats”.

To my mind, the loss of face Karzai suffered because of this “last-minute hitch” as much as the suspicions he has entertained of American intentions since his 2009 re-election prompted the broadside he launched against the Americans in a nationally televised speech on Sunday.

In essence he said that the two suicide attacks by the Taliban in Khost and then outside the gate of the defence ministry in Kabul, which killed 19 people, were not a show of force by the Taliban rather “a service to the foreigners”. “These bombings,” he said, “aimed to prolong the presence of the American forces in Afghanistan.” He accused the Americans of talking to the “Taliban leaders and Taliban representatives abroad everyday”.

As a result the Americans, citing security reasons, cancelled the scheduled joint press conference but went ahead with the private dinner Karzai had arranged with Hagel.

For the moment the Americans seem to be engaged in damage control. The new American commander in Afghanistan Gen Dunford addressing his own press conference said, “President Karzai has never said to me that the United States was colluding with the Taliban. I don’t know what caused him to say that today.… It’s categorically false. We have no reason to be colluding with the Taliban”. He went on, however, to say “we do not have a broken relationship” and went on to suggest that Karzai had engaged in political gamesmanship given that he has both “an internal and external audience”.

Hagel after his dinner with Karzai told reporters that he had reassured Karzai that the US had no unilateral back channel talks with the Taliban. “Obviously,” he said, “the United States will support efforts if they are led by the Afghans to come to some possible solutions.”

On the issue of Bagram prison, Karzai’s office had issued a statement after a Karzai-Dunford meeting late Saturday evening that the transfer would now take place in the coming week “allowing time for some of the remaining technical details concerning the handover to be resolved”.

This seems unlikely since if this had really been the expectation Karzai would not have made the speech he gave on Sunday. The Americans are clear that they will not allow the release of those they consider to be “enduring security threats”. Karzai may believe that securing the authority to release the mostly Pakhtun detainees will improve his domestic standing but he will have to accept some limitations.

Karzai is capable of changing his stance. He has done so in the past. But given the current situation and his current attitude it appears unlikely that the Americans can reach an agreement with the Karzai administration on a residual American/Nato troop presence. It also seems unlikely that reconciliation will move forward on the terms that Karzai desires and which the Taliban reject. Will Western assistance to Afghanistan continue?

It would be pertinent to ask where all this leaves Pakistan which more than any other country has a vital stake in Afghanistan’s stability. We must find ways to help achieve reconciliation without which there can be no peace in Afghanistan. We must find ways to ensure that the international community is not so put off as to walk away from Afghanistan. Our domestic preoccupations notwithstanding this is some-thing that we must address using all the diplomatic and political tools we can muster.

Re: Afghan leader alleges US-Taliban collusion

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/world/asia/karzais-bet-vilifying-us.html?hp&_r=1&

Re: Afghan leader alleges US-Taliban collusion

Afghan President Karzai refuted the statement that he ever accused the United States of colluding with the Taliban to justify its presence in Afghanistan. We keep forgetting that Karzai has been an elected president of Afghanistan for almost a decade and during that time Afghanistan has seen much development. Many on the forums give much credence to the Taliban. Violent extremism has been rejected by the Afghan masses. They rejected the rule of guns and choose the rule of law. Afghanistan has progressed enough with a well trained, strong and dedicated security force and a system of democratic governance that will take them a long way. The U.S. leadership has promised the Afghan people that they will not be abandoned and that is the reason we will stay engaged with the region even with the 2014 withdrawn date of our fighting forces. Afghans are hard working people who are proud of their heritage. We have no doubt that after decades of war and destruction they are on their way to becoming a self reliant and a strong nation.

Abdul Quddus
DET-United States Central Command
(http://www.centcom.mil/ur)