If one has commited adultry and doesnt wish to marry him as the relationship isnt working out is it a sin? I mean I know adultry was a sin but would it be a bigger sin to leave the person and marry someone else?
Re: adultry
I think Islamically the couple thats has commited adultary cant get married. Correct me if i am wrong.
Re: adultry
Just so the term is used corrected, adultery means having an affair with another person after one is in a committed/married relationship. Fornication or zinna is to have sex outside of the bounds of holy matrimony.
Re: adultry
That doesnt make any sense to me :no:
Re: adultry
Islamically, any relationship between a man and a woman outside marriage is Haraam in the first place.** they will be subject to Islamic punishment. marriage will NOT absolve them of their sins. there is NO difference in the severity of the sin if you are 'committed' or NOT...*there is NO such thing as *'committed'**** in Islam...***being 'committed' does NOT give anyone any license to commit any sin and consider that it's OK.*
Re: adultry
Kindly read this :
Fatwa from the European Council for Fatwa and Research translated by Anas at Takriti & others
[Resolution 5/4]
If a man and a woman who used to commit adultery (Zina) with each other wished to repent to Allah (swt), to leave haram for halal and the life of impurity to a pure and clean state of living, then their marriage is correct by the consensus of scholars. The majority of scholars did not set repentance orTawba as a condition for the correctness of the marriage to a woman adulteress, as it was narrated that Omar (ra) punished a man and a woman who were found guilty of adultery and then attempted to bring them together in marriage[1]](This Page Was Not Found - abdullahhasan.net).
The Hanbalis alone set repentance as a condition and gave in evidence the Quranic verse: “The adulterer cannot have sexual relations with any but an adulteress, and the adulteress, none can have sexual relations with her but an adulterer. To the Believers such a thing is forbidden” (24:3).
As for the issue of the period of waiting ‘I’dda’ for an adulteress before she can marry, there is a difference amongst the scholars. The Council’s opinion in relation to this matter is the view adopted by the Hanafis, the Shafi’is and Al-Thawri, that the adulteress has no period of waiting, even if she was actually pregnant as a result of her act of fornication. This was narrated on behalf of three of the companions who later became Caliphs: Abu Bakr, Omar and Ali (ra)[2]](This Page Was Not Found - abdullahhasan.net). They all gave in evidence the agreed upon Hadith: “The son of adultery shall be related to the husband and for the adulterer shall be total loss and deprivation“[3]](This Page Was Not Found - abdullahhasan.net), as the waiting period aims to keep correct account of the baby’s ancestry whilst the same does not apply to the child of adultery, and thus no waiting period is required. If a man married a woman pregnant with a child of adultery from another man, the marriage is correct according to Abu Hanifa and his companion Mohammed, and thus the fatwa of the Hanafi school. However, he is not to indulge into sexual intercourse with her until she gives birth, as the Prophet Mohammed (ppbuh) stated that: “It is not for a man who believes in Allah and the Last Day to allow his water to irrigate the plant of another”[4]](This Page Was Not Found - abdullahhasan.net).
This is unlike the case where the child of adultery is actually his, as the Hanafis and all those who deemed the marriage correct, agreed that he is then allowed to have sexual intercourse with her, as the plant is his and the pregnancy is because of him.
[HR][/HR]
[1]](This Page Was Not Found - abdullahhasan.net) Narrated by Al-Shafi’I in “Al-‘Umm” (10/38). Al-Bayhaqi narrated (7/155) from the Hadith of Abu Yazeed Al-Makki: “A man married a woman who had a daughter from another man whilst he had a son from another woman. The boy fornicated with the girl who subsequently became pregnant. When Omar came to Makkah, the matter was raised before him, so he called them and asked them. They both admitted to the sin. Omar (ra) then punished them by whipping them, and then attempted to bring them together in marriage, but the boy refused”. A good narration.
[2]](This Page Was Not Found - abdullahhasan.net)Noted by Mohammed ibn Al-Hassan Al-Shaybani in “Al-Hujja ‘Ala Ahlil Madina” (3/388), 38 narrated by Abu Bakr and Omar. Al-Bayhaqi mentioned the meaning of this in “Al-Sunan” (7/155) and it was narrated by Ibn Hazm in “Al-Muhalla” (9/476) from the two Companions’ Hadith, and also noted a Hadith (10/28) narrated by Omar carrying the same meaning
[3]](This Page Was Not Found - abdullahhasan.net) Agreed upon; narrated by Al-Bukhari (No.1948 and other locations) and Muslim (No.1457) from the Hadith of Aisha.
[4]](This Page Was Not Found - abdullahhasan.net) A Good Hadith. Narrated by Ahmed (28/207 No.16997), Abu Dawood (No.2158 and 2159) and Al-Bayhaqi (No.7/449 and 9/124) from the Hadith of Ruwayfi’ ibn Thabit which enjoys a good narration chain